Ethics on trial: A comment. Kleinman, T. Journal of Child Custody, 13(2-3):147–153, Routledge, USA, 2016.
abstract   bibtex   
This comment reviews attorney and mental health duties to the court and their profession and discusses ways to have an impact on how information, known to be considered without scientific basis, "junk science" is put forth to courts and what can possibly be done to stop that.
@article{Kleinman2016Ethics,
  author = {Kleinman, T.G.},
  title = {Ethics on trial: A comment},
  journal = {Journal of Child Custody},
  publisher = {Routledge},
  address = {USA},
  year = {2016},
  volume = {13},
  number = {2-3},
  pages = {147--153},
  abstract = {This comment reviews attorney and mental health duties to the court and their profession and discusses  ways to have an impact on how information, known to be considered without scientific basis, "junk science" is put forth to courts and what can possibly be done to stop that.},
  keywords = {ethics; custody; Daubert; attorney; Evidence Rule 702; expert; Frye; GArdner; parental alienation syndrome (PAS); Critics},
  language = {English}
}

Downloads: 0