Taxation of Intergenerational Transfers and Wealth. Kopczuk, W. In Auerbach, A. J., Chetty, R., Feldstein, M., & Saez, E., editors, Handbook of Public Economics, Ch. 6, pages 329–390. Elsevier, 2013. ![Taxation of Intergenerational Transfers and Wealth [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Link doi abstract bibtex 7 downloads In this chapter, I review empirical and theoretical literature on taxation of intergenerational transfers (estates, bequests, inheritances, inter vivos gifts) and wealth. The main message may be summarized as follows. Empirical evidence on bequest motivations and responses to estate taxation is spotty and much remains be done, but what we know points in the direction of (1) mixed motives, (2) heterogeneity of preferences, and (3) importance of retaining control over wealth. These patterns are important for normative analysis of taxation toward the top of the distribution. Theoretical work should further focus on understanding implications of inequality of inherited wealth: the topic that has been neglected in the past, even though it is closely related to-more carefully studied, but arguably much less important in practice-externalities from giving. Potential externalities from wealth accumulation and concentration are yet to be seriously addressed. © 2013 Elsevier B.V.
@incollection{Kopczuk2013b,
title = {Taxation of Intergenerational Transfers and Wealth},
booktitle = {Handbook of Public Economics},
author = {Kopczuk, Wojciech},
editor = {Auerbach, Alan J. and Chetty, Raj and Feldstein, Martin and Saez, Emmanuel},
year = {2013},
number = {4},
pages = {329--390},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
doi = {10.1016/B978-0-444-53759-1.00006-6},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53759-1.00006-6},
abstract = {In this chapter, I review empirical and theoretical literature on taxation of intergenerational transfers (estates, bequests, inheritances, inter vivos gifts) and wealth. The main message may be summarized as follows. Empirical evidence on bequest motivations and responses to estate taxation is spotty and much remains be done, but what we know points in the direction of (1) mixed motives, (2) heterogeneity of preferences, and (3) importance of retaining control over wealth. These patterns are important for normative analysis of taxation toward the top of the distribution. Theoretical work should further focus on understanding implications of inequality of inherited wealth: the topic that has been neglected in the past, even though it is closely related to-more carefully studied, but arguably much less important in practice-externalities from giving. Potential externalities from wealth accumulation and concentration are yet to be seriously addressed. \textcopyright{} 2013 Elsevier B.V.},
chapter = {Ch. 6},
keywords = {Cross-National Comparisons,{Estate, Inheritance, and Gift Taxes},Intergenerational Wealth},
annotation = {volume 5}
}
Downloads: 7
{"_id":"erjYGYSMTbzKfFQBG","bibbaseid":"kopczuk-taxationofintergenerationaltransfersandwealth-2013","author_short":["Kopczuk, W."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"incollection","type":"incollection","title":"Taxation of Intergenerational Transfers and Wealth","booktitle":"Handbook of Public Economics","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kopczuk"],"firstnames":["Wojciech"],"suffixes":[]}],"editor":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Auerbach"],"firstnames":["Alan","J."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Chetty"],"firstnames":["Raj"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Feldstein"],"firstnames":["Martin"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Saez"],"firstnames":["Emmanuel"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2013","number":"4","pages":"329–390","publisher":"Elsevier","doi":"10.1016/B978-0-444-53759-1.00006-6","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53759-1.00006-6","abstract":"In this chapter, I review empirical and theoretical literature on taxation of intergenerational transfers (estates, bequests, inheritances, inter vivos gifts) and wealth. The main message may be summarized as follows. Empirical evidence on bequest motivations and responses to estate taxation is spotty and much remains be done, but what we know points in the direction of (1) mixed motives, (2) heterogeneity of preferences, and (3) importance of retaining control over wealth. These patterns are important for normative analysis of taxation toward the top of the distribution. Theoretical work should further focus on understanding implications of inequality of inherited wealth: the topic that has been neglected in the past, even though it is closely related to-more carefully studied, but arguably much less important in practice-externalities from giving. Potential externalities from wealth accumulation and concentration are yet to be seriously addressed. © 2013 Elsevier B.V.","chapter":"Ch. 6","keywords":"Cross-National Comparisons,Estate, Inheritance, and Gift Taxes,Intergenerational Wealth","annotation":"volume 5","bibtex":"@incollection{Kopczuk2013b,\n title = {Taxation of Intergenerational Transfers and Wealth},\n booktitle = {Handbook of Public Economics},\n author = {Kopczuk, Wojciech},\n editor = {Auerbach, Alan J. and Chetty, Raj and Feldstein, Martin and Saez, Emmanuel},\n year = {2013},\n number = {4},\n pages = {329--390},\n publisher = {{Elsevier}},\n doi = {10.1016/B978-0-444-53759-1.00006-6},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53759-1.00006-6},\n abstract = {In this chapter, I review empirical and theoretical literature on taxation of intergenerational transfers (estates, bequests, inheritances, inter vivos gifts) and wealth. The main message may be summarized as follows. Empirical evidence on bequest motivations and responses to estate taxation is spotty and much remains be done, but what we know points in the direction of (1) mixed motives, (2) heterogeneity of preferences, and (3) importance of retaining control over wealth. These patterns are important for normative analysis of taxation toward the top of the distribution. Theoretical work should further focus on understanding implications of inequality of inherited wealth: the topic that has been neglected in the past, even though it is closely related to-more carefully studied, but arguably much less important in practice-externalities from giving. Potential externalities from wealth accumulation and concentration are yet to be seriously addressed. \\textcopyright{} 2013 Elsevier B.V.},\n chapter = {Ch. 6},\n keywords = {Cross-National Comparisons,{Estate, Inheritance, and Gift Taxes},Intergenerational Wealth},\n annotation = {volume 5}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Kopczuk, W."],"editor_short":["Auerbach, A. J.","Chetty, R.","Feldstein, M.","Saez, E."],"key":"Kopczuk2013b","id":"Kopczuk2013b","bibbaseid":"kopczuk-taxationofintergenerationaltransfersandwealth-2013","role":"author","urls":{"link":"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53759-1.00006-6"},"keyword":["Cross-National Comparisons","Estate","Inheritance","and Gift Taxes","Intergenerational Wealth"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":7},"bibtype":"incollection","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/f/nKAPSyp34A9azBzJd/GCWealthProject_WealthResearchLibrary.bib","dataSources":["Ehs2RwEzf4bZfKzK4","cJJHdqh9t5tR5wpLH","F3pGsndC3BMm5kzaE","t77TCZsnrGgyo6dsY","BCPeddFnrLq82SA2k","2w2tCMfz9tagnuYcn","grHFPbjkekLtP8Rd5","reZhxJTZLXbC6Xb4R","CievPB5mG8TuzbbZ3","XqKxryftLF3GWq6cY","M7of5cge3GPiYqZve","PZFBspX8PwJz5LKpx","ve96mwrzCBBzfBff6","zu77p3c7mn9doiv7C","gktz2DotJNwWxzBjM","s55XALJsj7pSgkAJ5","6TRStm8krC6i2nGYe","yda7rYQnmKoN94xAr","hHZFQp7q53h3BYKe8"],"keywords":["cross-national comparisons","estate","inheritance","and gift taxes","intergenerational wealth"],"search_terms":["taxation","intergenerational","transfers","wealth","kopczuk"],"title":"Taxation of Intergenerational Transfers and Wealth","year":2013,"downloads":7}