The Diabolical Strategy of Mimesis: Luce Irigaray's Reading of Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Kozel, S. Hypatia, 11(3):114–129, 1996. _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1996.tb01018.x
The Diabolical Strategy of Mimesis: Luce Irigaray's Reading of Maurice Merleau-Ponty [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
In this essay I explore the dynamic between Luce Irigaray and Maurice Merleau-Ponty as it unfolds in An Ethics of Sexual Difference (1993). Irigaray's strategy of mimesis is a powerful feminist tool, both philosophically and politically. Regarding textual engagement as analogous for relations between self and other beyond the text, I deliver a cautionary message: mimetic strategy is powerful but runs the risk of silencing the voice of the other.
@article{kozel_diabolical_1996,
	title = {The {Diabolical} {Strategy} of {Mimesis}: {Luce} {Irigaray}'s {Reading} of {Maurice} {Merleau}-{Ponty}},
	volume = {11},
	copyright = {1996 by Hypatia, Inc.},
	issn = {1527-2001},
	shorttitle = {The {Diabolical} {Strategy} of {Mimesis}},
	url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1996.tb01018.x},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1996.tb01018.x},
	abstract = {In this essay I explore the dynamic between Luce Irigaray and Maurice Merleau-Ponty as it unfolds in An Ethics of Sexual Difference (1993). Irigaray's strategy of mimesis is a powerful feminist tool, both philosophically and politically. Regarding textual engagement as analogous for relations between self and other beyond the text, I deliver a cautionary message: mimetic strategy is powerful but runs the risk of silencing the voice of the other.},
	language = {en},
	number = {3},
	urldate = {2020-11-24},
	journal = {Hypatia},
	author = {Kozel, Susan},
	year = {1996},
	note = {\_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1996.tb01018.x},
	pages = {114--129},
}

Downloads: 0