Experimental evidence of reciprocal altruism in the pied flycatcher. Krams, I., Krama, T., Igaune, K., & Mänd, R. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62(4):599–605, February, 2008.
Experimental evidence of reciprocal altruism in the pied flycatcher [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
Although human behaviour abounds with reciprocal altruism, few examples exist documenting reciprocal altruism in animals. Recent non-experimental evidence suggests that reciprocal altruism may be more common in nature than previously documented. Here we present experimental evidence of mobbing behaviour, the joint assault on a predator in an attempt to drive it away, as reciprocal altruism in the breeding pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca). Given a choice, pied flycatchers assisted in mobbing initiated by co-operating neighbours and did not join in mobbing when initiated by conspecific neighbours which had defected from necessary assistance 1 h before. The results suggest the birds followed a ‘tit-for-tat’-like strategy and that mobbing behaviour of breeding birds may be explained in terms of reciprocal altruism.
@article{krams_experimental_2008,
	title = {Experimental evidence of reciprocal altruism in the pied flycatcher},
	volume = {62},
	issn = {1432-0762},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0484-1},
	doi = {10.1007/s00265-007-0484-1},
	abstract = {Although human behaviour abounds with reciprocal altruism, few examples exist documenting reciprocal altruism in animals. Recent non-experimental evidence suggests that reciprocal altruism may be more common in nature than previously documented. Here we present experimental evidence of mobbing behaviour, the joint assault on a predator in an attempt to drive it away, as reciprocal altruism in the breeding pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca). Given a choice, pied flycatchers assisted in mobbing initiated by co-operating neighbours and did not join in mobbing when initiated by conspecific neighbours which had defected from necessary assistance 1 h before. The results suggest the birds followed a ‘tit-for-tat’-like strategy and that mobbing behaviour of breeding birds may be explained in terms of reciprocal altruism.},
	language = {en},
	number = {4},
	urldate = {2022-02-23},
	journal = {Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology},
	author = {Krams, Indrikis and Krama, Tatjana and Igaune, Kristine and Mänd, Raivo},
	month = feb,
	year = {2008},
	keywords = {unread},
	pages = {599--605},
}

Downloads: 0