@article{krugel_moral_2023,
	title = {The moral authority of {ChatGPT}},
	url = {https://www.proquest.com/working-papers/moral-authority-chatgpt/docview/2766880610/se-2},
	abstract = {ChatGPT is not only fun to chat with, but it also searches information, answers questions, and gives advice. With consistent moral advice, it might improve the moral judgment and decisions of users, who often hold contradictory moral beliefs. Unfortunately, ChatGPT turns out highly inconsistent as a moral advisor. Nonetheless, it influences users' moral judgment, we find in an experiment, even if they know they are advised by a chatting bot, and they underestimate how much they are influenced. Thus, ChatGPT threatens to corrupt rather than improves users' judgment. These findings raise the question of how to ensure the responsible use of ChatGPT and similar AI. Transparency is often touted but seems ineffective. We propose training to improve digital literacy.},
	language = {English},
	journal = {arXiv.org},
	author = {Krügel, Sebastian and Ostermaier, Andreas and Uhl, Matthias},
	month = jan,
	year = {2023},
	note = {Place: Ithaca
Publisher: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org},
	keywords = {Chatbots, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Business And Economics--Banking And Finance, Questions, Computers and Society, Human-Computer Interaction},
}

{"_id":"FATYg6iDu5vRZfN5J","bibbaseid":"krgel-ostermaier-uhl-themoralauthorityofchatgpt-2023","author_short":["Krügel, S.","Ostermaier, A.","Uhl, M."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"The moral authority of ChatGPT","url":"https://www.proquest.com/working-papers/moral-authority-chatgpt/docview/2766880610/se-2","abstract":"ChatGPT is not only fun to chat with, but it also searches information, answers questions, and gives advice. With consistent moral advice, it might improve the moral judgment and decisions of users, who often hold contradictory moral beliefs. Unfortunately, ChatGPT turns out highly inconsistent as a moral advisor. Nonetheless, it influences users' moral judgment, we find in an experiment, even if they know they are advised by a chatting bot, and they underestimate how much they are influenced. Thus, ChatGPT threatens to corrupt rather than improves users' judgment. These findings raise the question of how to ensure the responsible use of ChatGPT and similar AI. Transparency is often touted but seems ineffective. We propose training to improve digital literacy.","language":"English","journal":"arXiv.org","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Krügel"],"firstnames":["Sebastian"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ostermaier"],"firstnames":["Andreas"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Uhl"],"firstnames":["Matthias"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"January","year":"2023","note":"Place: Ithaca Publisher: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org","keywords":"Chatbots, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Business And Economics–Banking And Finance, Questions, Computers and Society, Human-Computer Interaction","bibtex":"@article{krugel_moral_2023,\n\ttitle = {The moral authority of {ChatGPT}},\n\turl = {https://www.proquest.com/working-papers/moral-authority-chatgpt/docview/2766880610/se-2},\n\tabstract = {ChatGPT is not only fun to chat with, but it also searches information, answers questions, and gives advice. With consistent moral advice, it might improve the moral judgment and decisions of users, who often hold contradictory moral beliefs. Unfortunately, ChatGPT turns out highly inconsistent as a moral advisor. Nonetheless, it influences users' moral judgment, we find in an experiment, even if they know they are advised by a chatting bot, and they underestimate how much they are influenced. Thus, ChatGPT threatens to corrupt rather than improves users' judgment. These findings raise the question of how to ensure the responsible use of ChatGPT and similar AI. Transparency is often touted but seems ineffective. We propose training to improve digital literacy.},\n\tlanguage = {English},\n\tjournal = {arXiv.org},\n\tauthor = {Krügel, Sebastian and Ostermaier, Andreas and Uhl, Matthias},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tnote = {Place: Ithaca\nPublisher: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org},\n\tkeywords = {Chatbots, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Business And Economics--Banking And Finance, Questions, Computers and Society, Human-Computer Interaction},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Krügel, S.","Ostermaier, A.","Uhl, M."],"key":"krugel_moral_2023","id":"krugel_moral_2023","bibbaseid":"krgel-ostermaier-uhl-themoralauthorityofchatgpt-2023","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.proquest.com/working-papers/moral-authority-chatgpt/docview/2766880610/se-2"},"keyword":["Chatbots","Artificial Intelligence","Machine Learning","Business And Economics–Banking And Finance","Questions","Computers and Society","Human-Computer Interaction"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/network/files/srCiZydJWRzXD39Ko","dataSources":["cYu6uhMkeFHgRrEty","hLMh7bwHyFsPNWAEL","LKW3iRvnztCpLNTW7","TLD9JxqHfSQQ4r268","X9BvByJrC3kGJexn8","iovNvcnNYDGJcuMq2","NjZJ5ZmWhTtMZBfje"],"keywords":["chatbots","artificial intelligence","machine learning","business and economics–banking and finance","questions","computers and society","human-computer interaction"],"search_terms":["moral","authority","chatgpt","krügel","ostermaier","uhl"],"title":"The moral authority of ChatGPT","year":2023}