@article{kwag-engstruct-2021,
title = {Significance of multi-hazard risk in design of buildings
under earthquake and wind loads},
author = {Shinyoung Kwag and Abhinav Gupta and John Baugh and Hyun-Su Kim},
journal = {Engineering Structures},
volume = {243},
pages = {112623},
year = {2021},
OPTissn = {xxx},
doi = {10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112623},
OPTurl = {https://www-sciencedirect-com.prox.lib.ncsu.edu/science/article/pii/S0141029621007732},
url_pdf = {papers/kwag-engstruct-2021.pdf},
keywords = {Earthquake and wind hazards; Performance-based design;
Risk-based multi-hazard approach; Multi-hazard risk map; Multi-hazard
scenario; Magneto-rheological damper; Adjacent buildings},
abstract = {
Traditionally, external hazards are considered in the design of a
building through the various combinations of loads prescribed in
relevant design codes and standards. It is often the case that the
design is governed by a single dominant hazard at a given geographic
location. This is particularly true for earthquake and wind hazards,
both of which impart time-dependent dynamic loads on the
structure. Engineers may nevertheless wonder if a building designed
for one of the two dominant hazards will satisfactorily withstand the
other. Prior studies have indicated that in some cases, when a
building is designed for a single dominant hazard, it does not
necessarily provide satisfactory performance against the other
hazard. In this paper, we propose a novel framework that builds upon
performance-based design requirements and determines whether the
design of a building is governed primarily by a single hazard or
multiple hazards. It integrates site-dependent hazard characteristics
with the performance criteria for a given building type and building
geometry. The framework is consistent with the burgeoning area of
probabilistic risk assessment, and yet can easily be extended to
traditional, deterministically characterized design requirements as
illustrated herein.}
}

{"_id":"SXnf2gwBuH7hAqtiv","bibbaseid":"kwag-gupta-baugh-kim-significanceofmultihazardriskindesignofbuildingsunderearthquakeandwindloads-2021","author_short":["Kwag, S.","Gupta, A.","Baugh, J.","Kim, H."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Significance of multi-hazard risk in design of buildings under earthquake and wind loads","author":[{"firstnames":["Shinyoung"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kwag"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Abhinav"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Gupta"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["John"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Baugh"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Hyun-Su"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kim"],"suffixes":[]}],"journal":"Engineering Structures","volume":"243","pages":"112623","year":"2021","optissn":"xxx","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112623","opturl":"https://www-sciencedirect-com.prox.lib.ncsu.edu/science/article/pii/S0141029621007732","url_pdf":"papers/kwag-engstruct-2021.pdf","keywords":"Earthquake and wind hazards; Performance-based design; Risk-based multi-hazard approach; Multi-hazard risk map; Multi-hazard scenario; Magneto-rheological damper; Adjacent buildings","abstract":"Traditionally, external hazards are considered in the design of a building through the various combinations of loads prescribed in relevant design codes and standards. It is often the case that the design is governed by a single dominant hazard at a given geographic location. This is particularly true for earthquake and wind hazards, both of which impart time-dependent dynamic loads on the structure. Engineers may nevertheless wonder if a building designed for one of the two dominant hazards will satisfactorily withstand the other. Prior studies have indicated that in some cases, when a building is designed for a single dominant hazard, it does not necessarily provide satisfactory performance against the other hazard. In this paper, we propose a novel framework that builds upon performance-based design requirements and determines whether the design of a building is governed primarily by a single hazard or multiple hazards. It integrates site-dependent hazard characteristics with the performance criteria for a given building type and building geometry. The framework is consistent with the burgeoning area of probabilistic risk assessment, and yet can easily be extended to traditional, deterministically characterized design requirements as illustrated herein.","bibtex":"@article{kwag-engstruct-2021,\ntitle = {Significance of multi-hazard risk in design of buildings\nunder earthquake and wind loads},\nauthor = {Shinyoung Kwag and Abhinav Gupta and John Baugh and Hyun-Su Kim},\njournal = {Engineering Structures},\nvolume = {243},\npages = {112623},\nyear = {2021},\nOPTissn = {xxx},\ndoi = {10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112623},\nOPTurl = {https://www-sciencedirect-com.prox.lib.ncsu.edu/science/article/pii/S0141029621007732},\nurl_pdf = {papers/kwag-engstruct-2021.pdf},\nkeywords = {Earthquake and wind hazards; Performance-based design;\nRisk-based multi-hazard approach; Multi-hazard risk map; Multi-hazard\nscenario; Magneto-rheological damper; Adjacent buildings},\nabstract = {\nTraditionally, external hazards are considered in the design of a\nbuilding through the various combinations of loads prescribed in\nrelevant design codes and standards. It is often the case that the\ndesign is governed by a single dominant hazard at a given geographic\nlocation. This is particularly true for earthquake and wind hazards,\nboth of which impart time-dependent dynamic loads on the\nstructure. Engineers may nevertheless wonder if a building designed\nfor one of the two dominant hazards will satisfactorily withstand the\nother. Prior studies have indicated that in some cases, when a\nbuilding is designed for a single dominant hazard, it does not\nnecessarily provide satisfactory performance against the other\nhazard. In this paper, we propose a novel framework that builds upon\nperformance-based design requirements and determines whether the\ndesign of a building is governed primarily by a single hazard or\nmultiple hazards. It integrates site-dependent hazard characteristics\nwith the performance criteria for a given building type and building\ngeometry. The framework is consistent with the burgeoning area of\nprobabilistic risk assessment, and yet can easily be extended to\ntraditional, deterministically characterized design requirements as\nillustrated herein.}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Kwag, S.","Gupta, A.","Baugh, J.","Kim, H."],"key":"kwag-engstruct-2021","id":"kwag-engstruct-2021","bibbaseid":"kwag-gupta-baugh-kim-significanceofmultihazardriskindesignofbuildingsunderearthquakeandwindloads-2021","role":"author","urls":{" pdf":"https://jwbaugh.github.io/papers/kwag-engstruct-2021.pdf"},"keyword":["Earthquake and wind hazards; Performance-based design; Risk-based multi-hazard approach; Multi-hazard risk map; Multi-hazard scenario; Magneto-rheological damper; Adjacent buildings"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":2},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://jwbaugh.github.io/jwb.bib","dataSources":["pewK2DSYXKNLH3TTe"],"keywords":["earthquake and wind hazards; performance-based design; risk-based multi-hazard approach; multi-hazard risk map; multi-hazard scenario; magneto-rheological damper; adjacent buildings"],"search_terms":["significance","multi","hazard","risk","design","buildings","under","earthquake","wind","loads","kwag","gupta","baugh","kim"],"title":"Significance of multi-hazard risk in design of buildings under earthquake and wind loads","year":2021,"downloads":2}