Assessing the heterogeneity of in silico plasmid predictions based on whole-genome-sequenced clinical isolates. Laczny, C. C, Galata, V., Plum, A., Posch, A. E, & Keller, A. Briefings in bioinformatics, December, 2017. doi abstract bibtex High-throughput next-generation shotgun sequencing of pathogenic bacteria is growing in clinical relevance, especially for chromosomal DNA-based taxonomic identification and for antibiotic resistance prediction. Genetic exchange is facilitated for extrachromosomal DNA, e.g. plasmid-borne antibiotic resistance genes. Consequently, accurate identification of plasmids from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data remains one of the major challenges for sequencing-based precision medicine in infectious diseases. Here, we assess the heterogeneity of four state-of-the-art tools (cBar, PlasmidFinder, plasmidSPAdes and Recycler) for the in silico prediction of plasmid-derived sequences from WGS data. Heterogeneity, sensitivity and precision were evaluated by reference-independent and reference-dependent benchmarking using 846 Gram-negative clinical isolates. Interestingly, the majority of predicted sequences were tool-specific, resulting in a pronounced heterogeneity across tools for the reference-independent assessment. In the reference-dependent assessment, sensitivity and precision values were found to substantially vary between tools and across taxa, with cBar exhibiting the highest median sensitivity (87.45%) but a low median precision (27.05%). Furthermore, integrating the individual tools into an ensemble approach showed increased sensitivity (95.55%) while reducing the precision (25.62%). CBar and plasmidSPAdes exhibited the strongest concordance with respect to identified antibiotic resistance factors. Moreover, false-positive plasmid predictions typically contained only few antibiotic resistance factors. In conclusion, while high degrees of heterogeneity and variation in sensitivity and precision were observed across the different tools and taxa, existing tools are valuable for investigating the plasmid-borne resistome. Nevertheless, additional studies on representative clinical data sets will be necessary to translate in silico plasmid prediction approaches from research to clinical application.
@Article{Laczny2017,
author = {Laczny, Cedric C and Galata, Valentina and Plum, Achim and Posch, Andreas E and Keller, Andreas},
title = {Assessing the heterogeneity of in silico plasmid predictions based on whole-genome-sequenced clinical isolates.},
journal = {Briefings in bioinformatics},
year = {2017},
month = dec,
issn = {1477-4054},
abstract = {High-throughput next-generation shotgun sequencing of pathogenic bacteria is growing in clinical relevance, especially for chromosomal DNA-based taxonomic identification and for antibiotic resistance prediction. Genetic exchange is facilitated for extrachromosomal DNA, e.g. plasmid-borne antibiotic resistance genes. Consequently, accurate identification of plasmids from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data remains one of the major challenges for sequencing-based precision medicine in infectious diseases. Here, we assess the heterogeneity of four state-of-the-art tools (cBar, PlasmidFinder, plasmidSPAdes and Recycler) for the in silico prediction of plasmid-derived sequences from WGS data. Heterogeneity, sensitivity and precision were evaluated by reference-independent and reference-dependent benchmarking using 846 Gram-negative clinical isolates. Interestingly, the majority of predicted sequences were tool-specific, resulting in a pronounced heterogeneity across tools for the reference-independent assessment. In the reference-dependent assessment, sensitivity and precision values were found to substantially vary between tools and across taxa, with cBar exhibiting the highest median sensitivity (87.45%) but a low median precision (27.05%). Furthermore, integrating the individual tools into an ensemble approach showed increased sensitivity (95.55%) while reducing the precision (25.62%). CBar and plasmidSPAdes exhibited the strongest concordance with respect to identified antibiotic resistance factors. Moreover, false-positive plasmid predictions typically contained only few antibiotic resistance factors. In conclusion, while high degrees of heterogeneity and variation in sensitivity and precision were observed across the different tools and taxa, existing tools are valuable for investigating the plasmid-borne resistome. Nevertheless, additional studies on representative clinical data sets will be necessary to translate in silico plasmid prediction approaches from research to clinical application.},
country = {England},
doi = {10.1093/bib/bbx162},
issn-linking = {1467-5463},
keywords = {bacteria; next-generation sequencing; plasmids; prediction},
nlm-id = {100912837},
owner = {NLM},
pii = {4696344},
pmid = {29220507},
pubmodel = {Print-Electronic},
pubstatus = {aheadofprint},
revised = {2017-12-08},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"L8gu2cqsyyzu3rHps","bibbaseid":"laczny-galata-plum-posch-keller-assessingtheheterogeneityofinsilicoplasmidpredictionsbasedonwholegenomesequencedclinicalisolates-2017","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2018-07-24T15:09:56.717Z","title":"Assessing the heterogeneity of in silico plasmid predictions based on whole-genome-sequenced clinical isolates.","author_short":["Laczny, C. C","Galata, V.","Plum, A.","Posch, A. E","Keller, A."],"year":2017,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://www.ccb.uni-saarland.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/references.bib_.txt","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Laczny"],"firstnames":["Cedric","C"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Galata"],"firstnames":["Valentina"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Plum"],"firstnames":["Achim"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Posch"],"firstnames":["Andreas","E"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Keller"],"firstnames":["Andreas"],"suffixes":[]}],"title":"Assessing the heterogeneity of in silico plasmid predictions based on whole-genome-sequenced clinical isolates.","journal":"Briefings in bioinformatics","year":"2017","month":"December","issn":"1477-4054","abstract":"High-throughput next-generation shotgun sequencing of pathogenic bacteria is growing in clinical relevance, especially for chromosomal DNA-based taxonomic identification and for antibiotic resistance prediction. Genetic exchange is facilitated for extrachromosomal DNA, e.g. plasmid-borne antibiotic resistance genes. Consequently, accurate identification of plasmids from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data remains one of the major challenges for sequencing-based precision medicine in infectious diseases. Here, we assess the heterogeneity of four state-of-the-art tools (cBar, PlasmidFinder, plasmidSPAdes and Recycler) for the in silico prediction of plasmid-derived sequences from WGS data. Heterogeneity, sensitivity and precision were evaluated by reference-independent and reference-dependent benchmarking using 846 Gram-negative clinical isolates. Interestingly, the majority of predicted sequences were tool-specific, resulting in a pronounced heterogeneity across tools for the reference-independent assessment. In the reference-dependent assessment, sensitivity and precision values were found to substantially vary between tools and across taxa, with cBar exhibiting the highest median sensitivity (87.45%) but a low median precision (27.05%). Furthermore, integrating the individual tools into an ensemble approach showed increased sensitivity (95.55%) while reducing the precision (25.62%). CBar and plasmidSPAdes exhibited the strongest concordance with respect to identified antibiotic resistance factors. Moreover, false-positive plasmid predictions typically contained only few antibiotic resistance factors. In conclusion, while high degrees of heterogeneity and variation in sensitivity and precision were observed across the different tools and taxa, existing tools are valuable for investigating the plasmid-borne resistome. Nevertheless, additional studies on representative clinical data sets will be necessary to translate in silico plasmid prediction approaches from research to clinical application.","country":"England","doi":"10.1093/bib/bbx162","issn-linking":"1467-5463","keywords":"bacteria; next-generation sequencing; plasmids; prediction","nlm-id":"100912837","owner":"NLM","pii":"4696344","pmid":"29220507","pubmodel":"Print-Electronic","pubstatus":"aheadofprint","revised":"2017-12-08","bibtex":"@Article{Laczny2017,\n author = {Laczny, Cedric C and Galata, Valentina and Plum, Achim and Posch, Andreas E and Keller, Andreas},\n title = {Assessing the heterogeneity of in silico plasmid predictions based on whole-genome-sequenced clinical isolates.},\n journal = {Briefings in bioinformatics},\n year = {2017},\n month = dec,\n issn = {1477-4054},\n abstract = {High-throughput next-generation shotgun sequencing of pathogenic bacteria is growing in clinical relevance, especially for chromosomal DNA-based taxonomic identification and for antibiotic resistance prediction. Genetic exchange is facilitated for extrachromosomal DNA, e.g. plasmid-borne antibiotic resistance genes. Consequently, accurate identification of plasmids from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data remains one of the major challenges for sequencing-based precision medicine in infectious diseases. Here, we assess the heterogeneity of four state-of-the-art tools (cBar, PlasmidFinder, plasmidSPAdes and Recycler) for the in silico prediction of plasmid-derived sequences from WGS data. Heterogeneity, sensitivity and precision were evaluated by reference-independent and reference-dependent benchmarking using 846 Gram-negative clinical isolates. Interestingly, the majority of predicted sequences were tool-specific, resulting in a pronounced heterogeneity across tools for the reference-independent assessment. In the reference-dependent assessment, sensitivity and precision values were found to substantially vary between tools and across taxa, with cBar exhibiting the highest median sensitivity (87.45%) but a low median precision (27.05%). Furthermore, integrating the individual tools into an ensemble approach showed increased sensitivity (95.55%) while reducing the precision (25.62%). CBar and plasmidSPAdes exhibited the strongest concordance with respect to identified antibiotic resistance factors. Moreover, false-positive plasmid predictions typically contained only few antibiotic resistance factors. In conclusion, while high degrees of heterogeneity and variation in sensitivity and precision were observed across the different tools and taxa, existing tools are valuable for investigating the plasmid-borne resistome. Nevertheless, additional studies on representative clinical data sets will be necessary to translate in silico plasmid prediction approaches from research to clinical application.},\n country = {England},\n doi = {10.1093/bib/bbx162},\n issn-linking = {1467-5463},\n keywords = {bacteria; next-generation sequencing; plasmids; prediction},\n nlm-id = {100912837},\n owner = {NLM},\n pii = {4696344},\n pmid = {29220507},\n pubmodel = {Print-Electronic},\n pubstatus = {aheadofprint},\n revised = {2017-12-08},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Laczny, C. C","Galata, V.","Plum, A.","Posch, A. E","Keller, A."],"key":"Laczny2017","id":"Laczny2017","bibbaseid":"laczny-galata-plum-posch-keller-assessingtheheterogeneityofinsilicoplasmidpredictionsbasedonwholegenomesequencedclinicalisolates-2017","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["bacteria; next-generation sequencing; plasmids; prediction"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{"keller, a":"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https://www.ccb.uni-saarland.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/references.bib_.txt&folding=1"}},"html":""},"search_terms":["assessing","heterogeneity","silico","plasmid","predictions","based","whole","genome","sequenced","clinical","isolates","laczny","galata","plum","posch","keller"],"keywords":["bacteria; next-generation sequencing; plasmids; prediction"],"authorIDs":["uqPgPxPv8wujtk7HZ"],"dataSources":["Tk7NyW85uR28Rhd26","k7tjjxqz46TBRgack","qqBiPXk2jEroaRXH2","9DxWazzLQoAjp9mw3","MaeSQYhi8jBE6oYaK","XSoPwnytNRZeNL8Wv","ukDDkYqwLbdhYXTJA","qd2NgSKHS68Kcdt7y","uFrEYNpx3Zmayo2AS","X7BjFZrHHnyywjGc5","iQsmnqgonvyW7tRge","RjjDBMYeiCRMZWAvn","pTW7v7XACewjrTXET","BD2qbudjMvyXtTiz5","NmhXQcJvRc2QhnSZF","ipvH6pWABxuwdKDLx","Pny5E4E9kc7C8gG8g","SiGP46KPWizw6ihLJ"]}