Can we trust self-reports of driving? Effects of impression management on driver behaviour questionnaire responses. Lajunen, T. & Summala, H. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 6(2):97–107, June, 2003. ![Can we trust self-reports of driving? Effects of impression management on driver behaviour questionnaire responses [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex Driver behaviour is often studied by using self-reports and questionnaires. Despite their obvious advantages, questionnaires are vulnerable to socially desirable response tendencies. In this study, the effects of socially desirable responding on self-reports of driving were studied by recording self-reports of driving in both public and private settings. In public settings, 47 applicants for a driving instructor training course completed the driver behaviour questionnaire (DBQ) and balanced inventory for socially desirable responding as a part of the entrance examination. In a private setting, 54 students of that training course completed the same questionnaires anonymously in the classroom. ANOVA results showed a difference between the two settings in six DBQ item scores, such that aberrant behaviours were reported less frequently in public than in private settings. The results indicated that bias caused by socially desirable responding is relatively small in DBQ responses.
@article{lajunen_can_2003,
title = {Can we trust self-reports of driving? {Effects} of impression management on driver behaviour questionnaire responses},
volume = {6},
issn = {1369-8478},
shorttitle = {Can we trust self-reports of driving?},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847803000081},
doi = {10.1016/S1369-8478(03)00008-1},
abstract = {Driver behaviour is often studied by using self-reports and questionnaires. Despite their obvious advantages, questionnaires are vulnerable to socially desirable response tendencies. In this study, the effects of socially desirable responding on self-reports of driving were studied by recording self-reports of driving in both public and private settings. In public settings, 47 applicants for a driving instructor training course completed the driver behaviour questionnaire (DBQ) and balanced inventory for socially desirable responding as a part of the entrance examination. In a private setting, 54 students of that training course completed the same questionnaires anonymously in the classroom. ANOVA results showed a difference between the two settings in six DBQ item scores, such that aberrant behaviours were reported less frequently in public than in private settings. The results indicated that bias caused by socially desirable responding is relatively small in DBQ responses.},
number = {2},
urldate = {2019-09-23},
journal = {Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour},
author = {Lajunen, Timo and Summala, Heikki},
month = jun,
year = {2003},
keywords = {Driver behaviour questionnaire, Public–private settings, Social desirability},
pages = {97--107},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"Cz4uAaKvHCqmyL9WD","bibbaseid":"lajunen-summala-canwetrustselfreportsofdrivingeffectsofimpressionmanagementondriverbehaviourquestionnaireresponses-2003","author_short":["Lajunen, T.","Summala, H."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Can we trust self-reports of driving? Effects of impression management on driver behaviour questionnaire responses","volume":"6","issn":"1369-8478","shorttitle":"Can we trust self-reports of driving?","url":"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847803000081","doi":"10.1016/S1369-8478(03)00008-1","abstract":"Driver behaviour is often studied by using self-reports and questionnaires. Despite their obvious advantages, questionnaires are vulnerable to socially desirable response tendencies. In this study, the effects of socially desirable responding on self-reports of driving were studied by recording self-reports of driving in both public and private settings. In public settings, 47 applicants for a driving instructor training course completed the driver behaviour questionnaire (DBQ) and balanced inventory for socially desirable responding as a part of the entrance examination. In a private setting, 54 students of that training course completed the same questionnaires anonymously in the classroom. ANOVA results showed a difference between the two settings in six DBQ item scores, such that aberrant behaviours were reported less frequently in public than in private settings. The results indicated that bias caused by socially desirable responding is relatively small in DBQ responses.","number":"2","urldate":"2019-09-23","journal":"Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lajunen"],"firstnames":["Timo"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Summala"],"firstnames":["Heikki"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"June","year":"2003","keywords":"Driver behaviour questionnaire, Public–private settings, Social desirability","pages":"97–107","bibtex":"@article{lajunen_can_2003,\n\ttitle = {Can we trust self-reports of driving? {Effects} of impression management on driver behaviour questionnaire responses},\n\tvolume = {6},\n\tissn = {1369-8478},\n\tshorttitle = {Can we trust self-reports of driving?},\n\turl = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847803000081},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/S1369-8478(03)00008-1},\n\tabstract = {Driver behaviour is often studied by using self-reports and questionnaires. Despite their obvious advantages, questionnaires are vulnerable to socially desirable response tendencies. In this study, the effects of socially desirable responding on self-reports of driving were studied by recording self-reports of driving in both public and private settings. In public settings, 47 applicants for a driving instructor training course completed the driver behaviour questionnaire (DBQ) and balanced inventory for socially desirable responding as a part of the entrance examination. In a private setting, 54 students of that training course completed the same questionnaires anonymously in the classroom. ANOVA results showed a difference between the two settings in six DBQ item scores, such that aberrant behaviours were reported less frequently in public than in private settings. The results indicated that bias caused by socially desirable responding is relatively small in DBQ responses.},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2019-09-23},\n\tjournal = {Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour},\n\tauthor = {Lajunen, Timo and Summala, Heikki},\n\tmonth = jun,\n\tyear = {2003},\n\tkeywords = {Driver behaviour questionnaire, Public–private settings, Social desirability},\n\tpages = {97--107},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Lajunen, T.","Summala, H."],"key":"lajunen_can_2003","id":"lajunen_can_2003","bibbaseid":"lajunen-summala-canwetrustselfreportsofdrivingeffectsofimpressionmanagementondriverbehaviourquestionnaireresponses-2003","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847803000081"},"keyword":["Driver behaviour questionnaire","Public–private settings","Social desirability"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/fareedkaviani","dataSources":["A6vS8ZPftztqxzpFy"],"keywords":["driver behaviour questionnaire","public–private settings","social desirability"],"search_terms":["trust","self","reports","driving","effects","impression","management","driver","behaviour","questionnaire","responses","lajunen","summala"],"title":"Can we trust self-reports of driving? Effects of impression management on driver behaviour questionnaire responses","year":2003}