On the Complexities of Testing for Compliance with Human Oversight Requirements in AI Regulation. Langer, M., Lazar, V., & Baum, K. In Bridging the Gap Between AI and Reality, volume 16220, pages 160–169. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2026.
Paper doi abstract bibtex Abstract Human oversight requirements are a core component of the European AI Act and in AI governance. In this paper, we highlight key challenges in testing for compliance with these requirements. A central difficulty lies in balancing simple, but potentially ineffective checklist-based approaches with resource-intensive and context-sensitive empirical testing of the effectiveness of human oversight of AI. Questions regarding when to update compliance testing, the context-dependent nature of human oversight requirements, and difficult-to-operationalize standards further complicate compliance testing. We argue that these challenges illustrate broader challenges in the future of sociotechnical AI governance, i.e. a future that shifts from ensuring “good” technological products to “good” sociotechnical systems.
@incollection{langerComplexitiesTestingCompliance2026,
address = {Cham},
title = {On the {Complexities} of {Testing} for {Compliance} with {Human} {Oversight} {Requirements} in {AI} {Regulation}},
volume = {16220},
isbn = {978-3-032-07131-6 978-3-032-07132-3},
url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-032-07132-3_11},
doi = {10.1007/978-3-032-07132-3_11},
abstract = {Abstract
Human oversight requirements are a core component of the European AI Act and in AI governance. In this paper, we highlight key challenges in testing for compliance with these requirements. A central difficulty lies in balancing simple, but potentially ineffective checklist-based approaches with resource-intensive and context-sensitive empirical testing of the effectiveness of human oversight of AI. Questions regarding when to update compliance testing, the context-dependent nature of human oversight requirements, and difficult-to-operationalize standards further complicate compliance testing. We argue that these challenges illustrate broader challenges in the future of sociotechnical AI governance, i.e. a future that shifts from ensuring “good” technological products to “good” sociotechnical systems.},
language = {en},
urldate = {2026-01-23},
booktitle = {Bridging the {Gap} {Between} {AI} and {Reality}},
publisher = {Springer Nature Switzerland},
author = {Langer, Markus and Lazar, Veronika and Baum, Kevin},
editor = {Steffen, Bernhard},
year = {2026},
pages = {160--169},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"DFYkwiAtXEsMntcF8","bibbaseid":"langer-lazar-baum-onthecomplexitiesoftestingforcompliancewithhumanoversightrequirementsinairegulation-2026","author_short":["Langer, M.","Lazar, V.","Baum, K."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"incollection","type":"incollection","address":"Cham","title":"On the Complexities of Testing for Compliance with Human Oversight Requirements in AI Regulation","volume":"16220","isbn":"978-3-032-07131-6 978-3-032-07132-3","url":"https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-032-07132-3_11","doi":"10.1007/978-3-032-07132-3_11","abstract":"Abstract Human oversight requirements are a core component of the European AI Act and in AI governance. In this paper, we highlight key challenges in testing for compliance with these requirements. A central difficulty lies in balancing simple, but potentially ineffective checklist-based approaches with resource-intensive and context-sensitive empirical testing of the effectiveness of human oversight of AI. Questions regarding when to update compliance testing, the context-dependent nature of human oversight requirements, and difficult-to-operationalize standards further complicate compliance testing. We argue that these challenges illustrate broader challenges in the future of sociotechnical AI governance, i.e. a future that shifts from ensuring “good” technological products to “good” sociotechnical systems.","language":"en","urldate":"2026-01-23","booktitle":"Bridging the Gap Between AI and Reality","publisher":"Springer Nature Switzerland","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Langer"],"firstnames":["Markus"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lazar"],"firstnames":["Veronika"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Baum"],"firstnames":["Kevin"],"suffixes":[]}],"editor":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Steffen"],"firstnames":["Bernhard"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2026","pages":"160–169","bibtex":"@incollection{langerComplexitiesTestingCompliance2026,\n\taddress = {Cham},\n\ttitle = {On the {Complexities} of {Testing} for {Compliance} with {Human} {Oversight} {Requirements} in {AI} {Regulation}},\n\tvolume = {16220},\n\tisbn = {978-3-032-07131-6 978-3-032-07132-3},\n\turl = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-032-07132-3_11},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/978-3-032-07132-3_11},\n\tabstract = {Abstract\n Human oversight requirements are a core component of the European AI Act and in AI governance. In this paper, we highlight key challenges in testing for compliance with these requirements. A central difficulty lies in balancing simple, but potentially ineffective checklist-based approaches with resource-intensive and context-sensitive empirical testing of the effectiveness of human oversight of AI. Questions regarding when to update compliance testing, the context-dependent nature of human oversight requirements, and difficult-to-operationalize standards further complicate compliance testing. We argue that these challenges illustrate broader challenges in the future of sociotechnical AI governance, i.e. a future that shifts from ensuring “good” technological products to “good” sociotechnical systems.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2026-01-23},\n\tbooktitle = {Bridging the {Gap} {Between} {AI} and {Reality}},\n\tpublisher = {Springer Nature Switzerland},\n\tauthor = {Langer, Markus and Lazar, Veronika and Baum, Kevin},\n\teditor = {Steffen, Bernhard},\n\tyear = {2026},\n\tpages = {160--169},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Langer, M.","Lazar, V.","Baum, K."],"editor_short":["Steffen, B."],"key":"langerComplexitiesTestingCompliance2026","id":"langerComplexitiesTestingCompliance2026","bibbaseid":"langer-lazar-baum-onthecomplexitiesoftestingforcompliancewithhumanoversightrequirementsinairegulation-2026","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-032-07132-3_11"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"incollection","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero-group/ndrmyrvtl/5786256","dataSources":["5EQ7rDLpRYyekvrfx"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["complexities","testing","compliance","human","oversight","requirements","regulation","langer","lazar","baum"],"title":"On the Complexities of Testing for Compliance with Human Oversight Requirements in AI Regulation","year":2026}