Noise Increases Anchoring Effects. Lee, C. & Morewedge, C. K. Psychological science, 33:60–75, 2022. doi abstract bibtex We introduce a theoretical framework distinguishing between anchoring effects, anchoring bias, and judgmental noise: Anchoring effects require anchoring bias, but noise modulates their size. We tested this framework by manipulating stimulus magnitudes. As magnitudes increase, psychophysical noise due to scalar variability widens the perceived range of plausible values for the stimulus. This increased noise, in turn, increases the influence of anchoring bias on judgments. In 11 preregistered experiments ( = 3,552 adults), anchoring effects increased with stimulus magnitude for point estimates of familiar and novel stimuli (e.g., reservation prices for hotels and donuts, counts in dot arrays). Comparisons of relevant and irrelevant anchors showed that noise itself did not produce anchoring effects. Noise amplified anchoring bias. Our findings identify a stimulus feature predicting the size and replicability of anchoring effects-stimulus magnitude. More broadly, we show how to use psychophysical noise to test relationships between bias and noise in judgment under uncertainty.
@Article{Lee2022,
author = {Lee, Chang-Yuan and Morewedge, Carey K.},
journal = {Psychological science},
title = {Noise Increases Anchoring Effects.},
year = {2022},
issn = {1467-9280},
pages = {60--75},
volume = {33},
abstract = {We introduce a theoretical framework distinguishing between anchoring effects, anchoring bias, and judgmental noise: Anchoring effects require anchoring bias, but noise modulates their size. We tested this framework by manipulating stimulus magnitudes. As magnitudes increase, psychophysical noise due to scalar variability widens the perceived range of plausible values for the stimulus. This increased noise, in turn, increases the influence of anchoring bias on judgments. In 11 preregistered experiments ( = 3,552 adults), anchoring effects increased with stimulus magnitude for point estimates of familiar and novel stimuli (e.g., reservation prices for hotels and donuts, counts in dot arrays). Comparisons of relevant and irrelevant anchors showed that noise itself did not produce anchoring effects. Noise amplified anchoring bias. Our findings identify a stimulus feature predicting the size and replicability of anchoring effects-stimulus magnitude. More broadly, we show how to use psychophysical noise to test relationships between bias and noise in judgment under uncertainty.},
citation-subset = {IM},
country = {United States},
doi = {10.1177/09567976211024254},
groups = {Gain control},
issn-linking = {0956-7976},
issue = {1},
keywords = {anchoring bias; judgment under uncertainty; noise; numerical cognition; open data; open materials; preregistered},
nlm-id = {9007542},
pmid = {34878951},
pubmodel = {Print-Electronic},
pubstate = {ppublish},
revised = {2022-01-21},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"NbnBscYpZQrwqdvKz","bibbaseid":"lee-morewedge-noiseincreasesanchoringeffects-2022","author_short":["Lee, C.","Morewedge, C. K."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lee"],"firstnames":["Chang-Yuan"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Morewedge"],"firstnames":["Carey","K."],"suffixes":[]}],"journal":"Psychological science","title":"Noise Increases Anchoring Effects.","year":"2022","issn":"1467-9280","pages":"60–75","volume":"33","abstract":"We introduce a theoretical framework distinguishing between anchoring effects, anchoring bias, and judgmental noise: Anchoring effects require anchoring bias, but noise modulates their size. We tested this framework by manipulating stimulus magnitudes. As magnitudes increase, psychophysical noise due to scalar variability widens the perceived range of plausible values for the stimulus. This increased noise, in turn, increases the influence of anchoring bias on judgments. In 11 preregistered experiments ( = 3,552 adults), anchoring effects increased with stimulus magnitude for point estimates of familiar and novel stimuli (e.g., reservation prices for hotels and donuts, counts in dot arrays). Comparisons of relevant and irrelevant anchors showed that noise itself did not produce anchoring effects. Noise amplified anchoring bias. Our findings identify a stimulus feature predicting the size and replicability of anchoring effects-stimulus magnitude. More broadly, we show how to use psychophysical noise to test relationships between bias and noise in judgment under uncertainty.","citation-subset":"IM","country":"United States","doi":"10.1177/09567976211024254","groups":"Gain control","issn-linking":"0956-7976","issue":"1","keywords":"anchoring bias; judgment under uncertainty; noise; numerical cognition; open data; open materials; preregistered","nlm-id":"9007542","pmid":"34878951","pubmodel":"Print-Electronic","pubstate":"ppublish","revised":"2022-01-21","bibtex":"@Article{Lee2022,\n author = {Lee, Chang-Yuan and Morewedge, Carey K.},\n journal = {Psychological science},\n title = {Noise Increases Anchoring Effects.},\n year = {2022},\n issn = {1467-9280},\n pages = {60--75},\n volume = {33},\n abstract = {We introduce a theoretical framework distinguishing between anchoring effects, anchoring bias, and judgmental noise: Anchoring effects require anchoring bias, but noise modulates their size. We tested this framework by manipulating stimulus magnitudes. As magnitudes increase, psychophysical noise due to scalar variability widens the perceived range of plausible values for the stimulus. This increased noise, in turn, increases the influence of anchoring bias on judgments. In 11 preregistered experiments ( = 3,552 adults), anchoring effects increased with stimulus magnitude for point estimates of familiar and novel stimuli (e.g., reservation prices for hotels and donuts, counts in dot arrays). Comparisons of relevant and irrelevant anchors showed that noise itself did not produce anchoring effects. Noise amplified anchoring bias. Our findings identify a stimulus feature predicting the size and replicability of anchoring effects-stimulus magnitude. More broadly, we show how to use psychophysical noise to test relationships between bias and noise in judgment under uncertainty.},\n citation-subset = {IM},\n country = {United States},\n doi = {10.1177/09567976211024254},\n groups = {Gain control},\n issn-linking = {0956-7976},\n issue = {1},\n keywords = {anchoring bias; judgment under uncertainty; noise; numerical cognition; open data; open materials; preregistered},\n nlm-id = {9007542},\n pmid = {34878951},\n pubmodel = {Print-Electronic},\n pubstate = {ppublish},\n revised = {2022-01-21},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Lee, C.","Morewedge, C. K."],"key":"Lee2022","id":"Lee2022","bibbaseid":"lee-morewedge-noiseincreasesanchoringeffects-2022","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["anchoring bias; judgment under uncertainty; noise; numerical cognition; open data; open materials; preregistered"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://endress.org/publications/ansgar.bib","dataSources":["xPGxHAeh3vZpx4yyE","TXa55dQbNoWnaGmMq"],"keywords":["anchoring bias; judgment under uncertainty; noise; numerical cognition; open data; open materials; preregistered"],"search_terms":["noise","increases","anchoring","effects","lee","morewedge"],"title":"Noise Increases Anchoring Effects.","year":2022}