On Ignorance: A Reply to Peels. Le Morvan, P. Philosophia, 39(2):335–344, June, 2011.
Paper doi abstract bibtex Rik Peels has ingeniously argued that ignorance is not equivalent to the lack or absence of knowledge. In this response, I defend the “Standard View of Ignorance” according to which they are equivalent. In the course of doing so, some important lessons will emerge concerning the nature of ignorance and its relationship to knowledge.
@article{le_morvan_ignorance_2011,
title = {On {Ignorance}: {A} {Reply} to {Peels}},
volume = {39},
issn = {1574-9274},
shorttitle = {On {Ignorance}},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-010-9292-3},
doi = {10.1007/s11406-010-9292-3},
abstract = {Rik Peels has ingeniously argued that ignorance is not equivalent to the lack or absence of knowledge. In this response, I defend the “Standard View of Ignorance” according to which they are equivalent. In the course of doing so, some important lessons will emerge concerning the nature of ignorance and its relationship to knowledge.},
language = {en},
number = {2},
urldate = {2022-12-20},
journal = {Philosophia},
author = {Le Morvan, Pierre},
month = jun,
year = {2011},
keywords = {Ignorance in history and philosophy of science and technology - general information, PRINTED (Fonds papier)},
pages = {335--344},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"ttWdebHp6XvXfJ5Sc","bibbaseid":"lemorvan-onignoranceareplytopeels-2011","author_short":["Le Morvan, P."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"On Ignorance: A Reply to Peels","volume":"39","issn":"1574-9274","shorttitle":"On Ignorance","url":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-010-9292-3","doi":"10.1007/s11406-010-9292-3","abstract":"Rik Peels has ingeniously argued that ignorance is not equivalent to the lack or absence of knowledge. In this response, I defend the “Standard View of Ignorance” according to which they are equivalent. In the course of doing so, some important lessons will emerge concerning the nature of ignorance and its relationship to knowledge.","language":"en","number":"2","urldate":"2022-12-20","journal":"Philosophia","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Le","Morvan"],"firstnames":["Pierre"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"June","year":"2011","keywords":"Ignorance in history and philosophy of science and technology - general information, PRINTED (Fonds papier)","pages":"335–344","bibtex":"@article{le_morvan_ignorance_2011,\n\ttitle = {On {Ignorance}: {A} {Reply} to {Peels}},\n\tvolume = {39},\n\tissn = {1574-9274},\n\tshorttitle = {On {Ignorance}},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-010-9292-3},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/s11406-010-9292-3},\n\tabstract = {Rik Peels has ingeniously argued that ignorance is not equivalent to the lack or absence of knowledge. In this response, I defend the “Standard View of Ignorance” according to which they are equivalent. In the course of doing so, some important lessons will emerge concerning the nature of ignorance and its relationship to knowledge.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2022-12-20},\n\tjournal = {Philosophia},\n\tauthor = {Le Morvan, Pierre},\n\tmonth = jun,\n\tyear = {2011},\n\tkeywords = {Ignorance in history and philosophy of science and technology - general information, PRINTED (Fonds papier)},\n\tpages = {335--344},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Le Morvan, P."],"key":"le_morvan_ignorance_2011","id":"le_morvan_ignorance_2011","bibbaseid":"lemorvan-onignoranceareplytopeels-2011","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-010-9292-3"},"keyword":["Ignorance in history and philosophy of science and technology - general information","PRINTED (Fonds papier)"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/science_et_ignorance/1340424","dataSources":["5XkfmA9xajmKjWGio","zX4acseCDM6D58AW7"],"keywords":["ignorance in history and philosophy of science and technology - general information","printed (fonds papier)"],"search_terms":["ignorance","reply","peels","le morvan"],"title":"On Ignorance: A Reply to Peels","year":2011}