Why the Standard View of Ignorance Prevails. Le Morvan, P. Philosophia, 41(1):239–256, March, 2013.
Why the Standard View of Ignorance Prevails [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
Rik Peels has forcefully argued that, contrary to what is widely held, ignorance is not equivalent to the lack or absence of knowledge. In doing so, he has argued against the Standard View of Ignorance according to which they are equivalent, and argued for what he calls “the New View” according to which ignorance is equivalent (merely) to the lack or absence of true belief. In this paper, I defend the Standard View against Peels’s latest case for the New View.
@article{le_morvan_why_2013,
	title = {Why the {Standard} {View} of {Ignorance} {Prevails}},
	volume = {41},
	issn = {1574-9274},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-013-9417-6},
	doi = {10.1007/s11406-013-9417-6},
	abstract = {Rik Peels has forcefully argued that, contrary to what is widely held, ignorance is not equivalent to the lack or absence of knowledge. In doing so, he has argued against the Standard View of Ignorance according to which they are equivalent, and argued for what he calls “the New View” according to which ignorance is equivalent (merely) to the lack or absence of true belief. In this paper, I defend the Standard View against Peels’s latest case for the New View.},
	language = {en},
	number = {1},
	urldate = {2022-12-20},
	journal = {Philosophia},
	author = {Le Morvan, Pierre},
	month = mar,
	year = {2013},
	keywords = {Ignorance in history and philosophy of science and technology - general information, PRINTED (Fonds papier)},
	pages = {239--256},
}

Downloads: 0