@incollection{LePoidevin2017,
abstract = {[first paragraph] To understand the nature of memory is to understand the nature of time itself. That rather bold thesis is the subject of the following discussion. The idea that we can simply read off the mind-independent nature of reality from our mental representations of it does seem rather doubtful, of course. But a rather more promising line of inquiry is to see whether some positions in debates about time's true nature sit rather better than do others with some widespread beliefs about remembering. So that is how this discussion will proceed, by first introducing a metaphysical debate about time, and then exploring the alleged connection with memory. The aspects of memory that we will be particularly concerned with are its role in structuring our perceptual experience, and its role in providing knowledge of our experiential pasts. And the metaphysical views of the nature of time those aspects (arguably) connect with concern the passage of time, the reality of the past, and the basis of time's direction.},
address = {New York},
author = {{Le Poidevin}, Robin},
booktitle = {The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Memory},
editor = {Bernecker, Sven and Michaelian, Kourken},
file = {:Users/michaelk/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Le Poidevin - 2017 - Memory and the metaphysics of time.pdf:pdf},
pages = {219--227},
publisher = {Routledge},
title = {{Memory and the metaphysics of time}},
year = {2017}
}

{"_id":"E7dtxmqgSB74gYeod","bibbaseid":"lepoidevin-memoryandthemetaphysicsoftime-2017","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2019-01-05T09:36:47.011Z","title":"Memory and the metaphysics of time","author_short":["Le Poidevin, R."],"year":2017,"bibtype":"incollection","biburl":"http://phil-mem.org/phil-mem.bib/","bibdata":{"bibtype":"incollection","type":"incollection","abstract":"[first paragraph] To understand the nature of memory is to understand the nature of time itself. That rather bold thesis is the subject of the following discussion. The idea that we can simply read off the mind-independent nature of reality from our mental representations of it does seem rather doubtful, of course. But a rather more promising line of inquiry is to see whether some positions in debates about time's true nature sit rather better than do others with some widespread beliefs about remembering. So that is how this discussion will proceed, by first introducing a metaphysical debate about time, and then exploring the alleged connection with memory. The aspects of memory that we will be particularly concerned with are its role in structuring our perceptual experience, and its role in providing knowledge of our experiential pasts. And the metaphysical views of the nature of time those aspects (arguably) connect with concern the passage of time, the reality of the past, and the basis of time's direction.","address":"New York","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Le Poidevin"],"firstnames":["Robin"],"suffixes":[]}],"booktitle":"The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Memory","editor":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bernecker"],"firstnames":["Sven"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Michaelian"],"firstnames":["Kourken"],"suffixes":[]}],"file":":Users/michaelk/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Le Poidevin - 2017 - Memory and the metaphysics of time.pdf:pdf","pages":"219–227","publisher":"Routledge","title":"Memory and the metaphysics of time","year":"2017","bibtex":"@incollection{LePoidevin2017,\nabstract = {[first paragraph] To understand the nature of memory is to understand the nature of time itself. That rather bold thesis is the subject of the following discussion. The idea that we can simply read off the mind-independent nature of reality from our mental representations of it does seem rather doubtful, of course. But a rather more promising line of inquiry is to see whether some positions in debates about time's true nature sit rather better than do others with some widespread beliefs about remembering. So that is how this discussion will proceed, by first introducing a metaphysical debate about time, and then exploring the alleged connection with memory. The aspects of memory that we will be particularly concerned with are its role in structuring our perceptual experience, and its role in providing knowledge of our experiential pasts. And the metaphysical views of the nature of time those aspects (arguably) connect with concern the passage of time, the reality of the past, and the basis of time's direction.},\naddress = {New York},\nauthor = {{Le Poidevin}, Robin},\nbooktitle = {The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Memory},\neditor = {Bernecker, Sven and Michaelian, Kourken},\nfile = {:Users/michaelk/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Le Poidevin - 2017 - Memory and the metaphysics of time.pdf:pdf},\npages = {219--227},\npublisher = {Routledge},\ntitle = {{Memory and the metaphysics of time}},\nyear = {2017}\n}\n","author_short":["Le Poidevin, R."],"editor_short":["Bernecker, S.","Michaelian, K."],"key":"LePoidevin2017","id":"LePoidevin2017","bibbaseid":"lepoidevin-memoryandthemetaphysicsoftime-2017","role":"author","urls":{},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["memory","metaphysics","time","le poidevin"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["xpm4HPGis5kQeHY7z"]}