@article{leslie_post-hegemonic_2018,
	title = {Post-hegemonic regionalism in {Oceania}: examining the development potential of the new framework for {Pacific} regionalism},
	volume = {31},
	issn = {14701332},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1305984},
	doi = {10.1080/09512748.2017.1305984},
	abstract = {This article explores the early potential of the Framework for Pacific regionalism, a new political process that Pacific nations are using to establish regional development priorities. The emergence of this process is positioned within a context of a desire for a new era of Pacific-led regional development collaboration. The early outcomes of the Framework are outlined and examined. Specifically, the article questions whether it is meeting aspirations for ‘game-changing' development goals that enjoy greater levels of ‘ownership' amongst Pacific leaders. It also explores whether the new process canbe seen as evidence of a new era of ‘post-hegemonic' regionalism in Oceania, characterised by a revitalisation of regional political debate; a rejection of ‘economism'; and the reassertion of indigenous and civil society concerns. © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor \& Francis Group.},
	number = {1},
	journal = {Pacific Review},
	author = {Leslie, Helen and Wild, Kirsty},
	year = {2018},
	note = {Publisher: Taylor \& Francis},
	keywords = {Pacific islands, development, framework for Pacific regionalism, post-hegemonic regionalism},
	pages = {20--37},
}

{"_id":"u9toJyTjvhbqsBN6i","bibbaseid":"leslie-wild-posthegemonicregionalisminoceaniaexaminingthedevelopmentpotentialofthenewframeworkforpacificregionalism-2018","author_short":["Leslie, H.","Wild, K."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Post-hegemonic regionalism in Oceania: examining the development potential of the new framework for Pacific regionalism","volume":"31","issn":"14701332","url":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1305984","doi":"10.1080/09512748.2017.1305984","abstract":"This article explores the early potential of the Framework for Pacific regionalism, a new political process that Pacific nations are using to establish regional development priorities. The emergence of this process is positioned within a context of a desire for a new era of Pacific-led regional development collaboration. The early outcomes of the Framework are outlined and examined. Specifically, the article questions whether it is meeting aspirations for ‘game-changing' development goals that enjoy greater levels of ‘ownership' amongst Pacific leaders. It also explores whether the new process canbe seen as evidence of a new era of ‘post-hegemonic' regionalism in Oceania, characterised by a revitalisation of regional political debate; a rejection of ‘economism'; and the reassertion of indigenous and civil society concerns. © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.","number":"1","journal":"Pacific Review","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Leslie"],"firstnames":["Helen"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Wild"],"firstnames":["Kirsty"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2018","note":"Publisher: Taylor & Francis","keywords":"Pacific islands, development, framework for Pacific regionalism, post-hegemonic regionalism","pages":"20–37","bibtex":"@article{leslie_post-hegemonic_2018,\n\ttitle = {Post-hegemonic regionalism in {Oceania}: examining the development potential of the new framework for {Pacific} regionalism},\n\tvolume = {31},\n\tissn = {14701332},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1305984},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/09512748.2017.1305984},\n\tabstract = {This article explores the early potential of the Framework for Pacific regionalism, a new political process that Pacific nations are using to establish regional development priorities. The emergence of this process is positioned within a context of a desire for a new era of Pacific-led regional development collaboration. The early outcomes of the Framework are outlined and examined. Specifically, the article questions whether it is meeting aspirations for ‘game-changing' development goals that enjoy greater levels of ‘ownership' amongst Pacific leaders. It also explores whether the new process canbe seen as evidence of a new era of ‘post-hegemonic' regionalism in Oceania, characterised by a revitalisation of regional political debate; a rejection of ‘economism'; and the reassertion of indigenous and civil society concerns. © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor \\& Francis Group.},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {Pacific Review},\n\tauthor = {Leslie, Helen and Wild, Kirsty},\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Taylor \\& Francis},\n\tkeywords = {Pacific islands, development, framework for Pacific regionalism, post-hegemonic regionalism},\n\tpages = {20--37},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Leslie, H.","Wild, K."],"key":"leslie_post-hegemonic_2018","id":"leslie_post-hegemonic_2018","bibbaseid":"leslie-wild-posthegemonicregionalisminoceaniaexaminingthedevelopmentpotentialofthenewframeworkforpacificregionalism-2018","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1305984"},"keyword":["Pacific islands","development","framework for Pacific regionalism","post-hegemonic regionalism"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero/Indicators","dataSources":["6RJNs7BNcJqWQGy57"],"keywords":["pacific islands","development","framework for pacific regionalism","post-hegemonic regionalism"],"search_terms":["post","hegemonic","regionalism","oceania","examining","development","potential","new","framework","pacific","regionalism","leslie","wild"],"title":"Post-hegemonic regionalism in Oceania: examining the development potential of the new framework for Pacific regionalism","year":2018}