Seepage: Climate change denial and its effect on the scientific community. Lewandowsky, S., Oreskes, N., Risbey, J., Newell, B., & Smithson, M. Global Environmental Change, 33:1–13, 2015. 1![Seepage: Climate change denial and its effect on the scientific community [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex Vested interests and political agents have long opposed political or regulatory action in response to climate change by appealing to scientific uncertainty. Here we examine the effect of such contrarian talking points on the scientific community itself. We show that although scientists are trained in dealing with uncertainty, there are several psychological reasons why scientists may nevertheless be susceptible to uncertainty-based argumentation, even when scientists recognize those arguments as false and are actively rebutting them. Specifically, we show that prolonged stereotype threat, pluralistic ignorance, and a form of projection (the third-person effect) may cause scientists to take positions that they would be less likely to take in the absence of outspoken public opposition. We illustrate the consequences of seepage from public debate into the scientific process with a case study involving the interpretation of temperature trends from the last 15 years. We offer ways in which the scientific community can detect and avoid such inadvertent seepage. © 2015 The Authors.
@article{lewandowsky_seepage_2015,
title = {Seepage: {Climate} change denial and its effect on the scientific community},
volume = {33},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84929407322&doi=10.1016%2fj.gloenvcha.2015.02.013&partnerID=40&md5=5a3331131abcc0c6d9d15c2a9ec597e7},
doi = {10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.013},
abstract = {Vested interests and political agents have long opposed political or regulatory action in response to climate change by appealing to scientific uncertainty. Here we examine the effect of such contrarian talking points on the scientific community itself. We show that although scientists are trained in dealing with uncertainty, there are several psychological reasons why scientists may nevertheless be susceptible to uncertainty-based argumentation, even when scientists recognize those arguments as false and are actively rebutting them. Specifically, we show that prolonged stereotype threat, pluralistic ignorance, and a form of projection (the third-person effect) may cause scientists to take positions that they would be less likely to take in the absence of outspoken public opposition. We illustrate the consequences of seepage from public debate into the scientific process with a case study involving the interpretation of temperature trends from the last 15 years. We offer ways in which the scientific community can detect and avoid such inadvertent seepage. © 2015 The Authors.},
journal = {Global Environmental Change},
author = {Lewandowsky, S. and Oreskes, N. and Risbey, J.S. and Newell, B.R. and Smithson, M.},
year = {2015},
note = {1},
keywords = {5 Ignorance and manufactured doubt, Ignorance et mécanismes de production du doute, PRINTED (Fonds papier)},
pages = {1--13},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"uxL4FQuCrPERzQZYq","bibbaseid":"lewandowsky-oreskes-risbey-newell-smithson-seepageclimatechangedenialanditseffectonthescientificcommunity-2015","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-09-09T06:27:34.594Z","title":"Seepage: Climate change denial and its effect on the scientific community","author_short":["Lewandowsky, S.","Oreskes, N.","Risbey, J.","Newell, B.","Smithson, M."],"year":2015,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/science_et_ignorance/1340424","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Seepage: Climate change denial and its effect on the scientific community","volume":"33","url":"https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84929407322&doi=10.1016%2fj.gloenvcha.2015.02.013&partnerID=40&md5=5a3331131abcc0c6d9d15c2a9ec597e7","doi":"10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.013","abstract":"Vested interests and political agents have long opposed political or regulatory action in response to climate change by appealing to scientific uncertainty. Here we examine the effect of such contrarian talking points on the scientific community itself. We show that although scientists are trained in dealing with uncertainty, there are several psychological reasons why scientists may nevertheless be susceptible to uncertainty-based argumentation, even when scientists recognize those arguments as false and are actively rebutting them. Specifically, we show that prolonged stereotype threat, pluralistic ignorance, and a form of projection (the third-person effect) may cause scientists to take positions that they would be less likely to take in the absence of outspoken public opposition. We illustrate the consequences of seepage from public debate into the scientific process with a case study involving the interpretation of temperature trends from the last 15 years. We offer ways in which the scientific community can detect and avoid such inadvertent seepage. © 2015 The Authors.","journal":"Global Environmental Change","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lewandowsky"],"firstnames":["S."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Oreskes"],"firstnames":["N."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Risbey"],"firstnames":["J.S."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Newell"],"firstnames":["B.R."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Smithson"],"firstnames":["M."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2015","note":"1","keywords":"5 Ignorance and manufactured doubt, Ignorance et mécanismes de production du doute, PRINTED (Fonds papier)","pages":"1–13","bibtex":"@article{lewandowsky_seepage_2015,\n\ttitle = {Seepage: {Climate} change denial and its effect on the scientific community},\n\tvolume = {33},\n\turl = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84929407322&doi=10.1016%2fj.gloenvcha.2015.02.013&partnerID=40&md5=5a3331131abcc0c6d9d15c2a9ec597e7},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.013},\n\tabstract = {Vested interests and political agents have long opposed political or regulatory action in response to climate change by appealing to scientific uncertainty. Here we examine the effect of such contrarian talking points on the scientific community itself. We show that although scientists are trained in dealing with uncertainty, there are several psychological reasons why scientists may nevertheless be susceptible to uncertainty-based argumentation, even when scientists recognize those arguments as false and are actively rebutting them. Specifically, we show that prolonged stereotype threat, pluralistic ignorance, and a form of projection (the third-person effect) may cause scientists to take positions that they would be less likely to take in the absence of outspoken public opposition. We illustrate the consequences of seepage from public debate into the scientific process with a case study involving the interpretation of temperature trends from the last 15 years. We offer ways in which the scientific community can detect and avoid such inadvertent seepage. © 2015 The Authors.},\n\tjournal = {Global Environmental Change},\n\tauthor = {Lewandowsky, S. and Oreskes, N. and Risbey, J.S. and Newell, B.R. and Smithson, M.},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tnote = {1},\n\tkeywords = {5 Ignorance and manufactured doubt, Ignorance et mécanismes de production du doute, PRINTED (Fonds papier)},\n\tpages = {1--13},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Lewandowsky, S.","Oreskes, N.","Risbey, J.","Newell, B.","Smithson, M."],"key":"lewandowsky_seepage_2015","id":"lewandowsky_seepage_2015","bibbaseid":"lewandowsky-oreskes-risbey-newell-smithson-seepageclimatechangedenialanditseffectonthescientificcommunity-2015","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84929407322&doi=10.1016%2fj.gloenvcha.2015.02.013&partnerID=40&md5=5a3331131abcc0c6d9d15c2a9ec597e7"},"keyword":["5 Ignorance and manufactured doubt","Ignorance et mécanismes de production du doute","PRINTED (Fonds papier)"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["seepage","climate","change","denial","effect","scientific","community","lewandowsky","oreskes","risbey","newell","smithson"],"keywords":["5 ignorance and manufactured doubt","ignorance et mécanismes de production du doute","printed (fonds papier)"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["zX4acseCDM6D58AW7","NTvuMntpta5z9CAbT"]}