Understanding how input matters: Verb learning and the footprint of universal grammar. Lidz, J., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L. R Cognition, 87(3):151-78, 2003. abstract bibtex Studies under the heading "syntactic bootstrapping" have demonstrated that syntax guides young children's interpretations during verb learning. We evaluate two hypotheses concerning the origins of syntactic bootstrapping effects. The "universalist" view, holding that syntactic bootstrapping falls out from universal properties of the syntax-semantics mapping, is shown to be superior to the "emergentist" view, which holds that argument structure patterns emerge from a process of categorization and generalization over the input. These theories diverge in their predictions about a language in which syntactic structure is not the most reliable cue to a certain meaning. In Kannada, causative morphology is a better predictor of causative meaning than transitivity is. Hence, the emergentist view predicts that Kannada-speaking children will associate causative morphology (in favor of transitive syntax) with causative meaning. The universalist theory, however, predicts the opposite pattern. Using an act-out task, we found that 3-year-old native speakers of Kannada associate argument number and not morphological form with causativity, supporting the universalist approach.
@Article{LidzGleitman2003,
author = {Jeffrey Lidz and Henry Gleitman and Lila R Gleitman},
journal = {Cognition},
title = {Understanding how input matters: {V}erb learning and the footprint of universal grammar.},
year = {2003},
number = {3},
pages = {151-78},
volume = {87},
abstract = {Studies under the heading "syntactic bootstrapping" have demonstrated
that syntax guides young children's interpretations during verb learning.
We evaluate two hypotheses concerning the origins of syntactic bootstrapping
effects. The "universalist" view, holding that syntactic bootstrapping
falls out from universal properties of the syntax-semantics mapping,
is shown to be superior to the "emergentist" view, which holds that
argument structure patterns emerge from a process of categorization
and generalization over the input. These theories diverge in their
predictions about a language in which syntactic structure is not
the most reliable cue to a certain meaning. In Kannada, causative
morphology is a better predictor of causative meaning than transitivity
is. Hence, the emergentist view predicts that Kannada-speaking children
will associate causative morphology (in favor of transitive syntax)
with causative meaning. The universalist theory, however, predicts
the opposite pattern. Using an act-out task, we found that 3-year-old
native speakers of Kannada associate argument number and not morphological
form with causativity, supporting the universalist approach.},
keywords = {Female, Human, Infant, Knowledge, Language Development, Learning, Linguistics, Male, Adult, Child Language, Child, Preschool, Comparative Study, Semantics, Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S., Verbal Learning, 14517356},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"HKwX4QwRfNv8sgwBm","bibbaseid":"lidz-gleitman-gleitman-understandinghowinputmattersverblearningandthefootprintofuniversalgrammar-2003","author_short":["Lidz, J.","Gleitman, H.","Gleitman, L. R"],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","author":[{"firstnames":["Jeffrey"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lidz"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Henry"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Gleitman"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Lila","R"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Gleitman"],"suffixes":[]}],"journal":"Cognition","title":"Understanding how input matters: Verb learning and the footprint of universal grammar.","year":"2003","number":"3","pages":"151-78","volume":"87","abstract":"Studies under the heading \"syntactic bootstrapping\" have demonstrated that syntax guides young children's interpretations during verb learning. We evaluate two hypotheses concerning the origins of syntactic bootstrapping effects. The \"universalist\" view, holding that syntactic bootstrapping falls out from universal properties of the syntax-semantics mapping, is shown to be superior to the \"emergentist\" view, which holds that argument structure patterns emerge from a process of categorization and generalization over the input. These theories diverge in their predictions about a language in which syntactic structure is not the most reliable cue to a certain meaning. In Kannada, causative morphology is a better predictor of causative meaning than transitivity is. Hence, the emergentist view predicts that Kannada-speaking children will associate causative morphology (in favor of transitive syntax) with causative meaning. The universalist theory, however, predicts the opposite pattern. Using an act-out task, we found that 3-year-old native speakers of Kannada associate argument number and not morphological form with causativity, supporting the universalist approach.","keywords":"Female, Human, Infant, Knowledge, Language Development, Learning, Linguistics, Male, Adult, Child Language, Child, Preschool, Comparative Study, Semantics, Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S., Verbal Learning, 14517356","bibtex":"@Article{LidzGleitman2003,\n author = {Jeffrey Lidz and Henry Gleitman and Lila R Gleitman},\n journal = {Cognition},\n title = {Understanding how input matters: {V}erb learning and the footprint of universal grammar.},\n year = {2003},\n number = {3},\n pages = {151-78},\n volume = {87},\n abstract = {Studies under the heading \"syntactic bootstrapping\" have demonstrated\n\tthat syntax guides young children's interpretations during verb learning.\n\tWe evaluate two hypotheses concerning the origins of syntactic bootstrapping\n\teffects. The \"universalist\" view, holding that syntactic bootstrapping\n\tfalls out from universal properties of the syntax-semantics mapping,\n\tis shown to be superior to the \"emergentist\" view, which holds that\n\targument structure patterns emerge from a process of categorization\n\tand generalization over the input. These theories diverge in their\n\tpredictions about a language in which syntactic structure is not\n\tthe most reliable cue to a certain meaning. In Kannada, causative\n\tmorphology is a better predictor of causative meaning than transitivity\n\tis. Hence, the emergentist view predicts that Kannada-speaking children\n\twill associate causative morphology (in favor of transitive syntax)\n\twith causative meaning. The universalist theory, however, predicts\n\tthe opposite pattern. Using an act-out task, we found that 3-year-old\n\tnative speakers of Kannada associate argument number and not morphological\n\tform with causativity, supporting the universalist approach.},\n keywords = {Female, Human, Infant, Knowledge, Language Development, Learning, Linguistics, Male, Adult, Child Language, Child, Preschool, Comparative Study, Semantics, Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S., Verbal Learning, 14517356},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Lidz, J.","Gleitman, H.","Gleitman, L. R"],"key":"LidzGleitman2003","id":"LidzGleitman2003","bibbaseid":"lidz-gleitman-gleitman-understandinghowinputmattersverblearningandthefootprintofuniversalgrammar-2003","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Female","Human","Infant","Knowledge","Language Development","Learning","Linguistics","Male","Adult","Child Language","Child","Preschool","Comparative Study","Semantics","Support","U.S. Gov't","P.H.S.","Verbal Learning","14517356"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://endress.org/publications/ansgar.bib","dataSources":["xPGxHAeh3vZpx4yyE","TXa55dQbNoWnaGmMq"],"keywords":["female","human","infant","knowledge","language development","learning","linguistics","male","adult","child language","child","preschool","comparative study","semantics","support","u.s. gov't","p.h.s.","verbal learning","14517356"],"search_terms":["understanding","input","matters","verb","learning","footprint","universal","grammar","lidz","gleitman","gleitman"],"title":"Understanding how input matters: Verb learning and the footprint of universal grammar.","year":2003}