@Article{RSM:Lik2015,
  author =       "D. Likhite and G. Adluru and N. Hu and C. McGann and E.
                 DiBella",
  title =        "Quantification of myocardial perfusion with self-gated
                 cardiovascular magnetic resonance.",
  journal =      "J Cardiovasc Magn Reson",
  year =         "2015",
  volume =       "17",
  number =       "1",
  pages =        "14",
  robnote =      "The use of a gated acquisition is a problem in situations
                 with a poor ECG signal. An undersampled saturation
                 recovery radial turboFLASH pulse sequence was used in 7
                 subjects to acquire dynamic contrast-enhanced images
                 during free-breathing. A single saturation pulse was
                 followed by acquisition of 4-5 slices after a delay of ~40
                 msec.  Regional myocardial blood flow estimates
                 (MBFs) obtained using self-gated systole (0.64 +/- 0.26
                 ml/min/g), self-gated diastole (0.64 +/- 0.26 ml/min/g),
                 and ECG-gated scans (0.65 +/- 0.28 ml/min/g) were similar.
                 The MBF values
                 estimated from self-gated and gated methods were not
                 significantly different. CONCLUSION: The self-gated
                 technique for quantification of regional myocardial
                 perfusion matched ECG-gated perfusion measurements well in
                 normal subjects at rest. Self-gated systolic perfusion
                 values matched ECG-gated perfusion values better than did
                 diastolic values.",
  bibdate =      "Thu May 21 13:28:46 2015",
  pmcid =        "PMC4325943",
}

{"_id":"duMT5XTeRjegfQCEv","bibbaseid":"likhite-adluru-hu-mcgann-dibella-quantificationofmyocardialperfusionwithselfgatedcardiovascularmagneticresonance-2015","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-07-01T21:38:36.451Z","title":"Quantification of myocardial perfusion with self-gated cardiovascular magnetic resonance.","author_short":["Likhite, D.","Adluru, G.","Hu, N.","McGann, C.","DiBella, E."],"year":2015,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://www.sci.utah.edu/~macleod/Bibtex/biglit.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","author":[{"firstnames":["D."],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Likhite"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["G."],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Adluru"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["N."],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hu"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["C."],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["McGann"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["E."],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["DiBella"],"suffixes":[]}],"title":"Quantification of myocardial perfusion with self-gated cardiovascular magnetic resonance.","journal":"J Cardiovasc Magn Reson","year":"2015","volume":"17","number":"1","pages":"14","robnote":"The use of a gated acquisition is a problem in situations with a poor ECG signal. An undersampled saturation recovery radial turboFLASH pulse sequence was used in 7 subjects to acquire dynamic contrast-enhanced images during free-breathing. A single saturation pulse was followed by acquisition of 4-5 slices after a delay of ~40 msec. Regional myocardial blood flow estimates (MBFs) obtained using self-gated systole (0.64 +/- 0.26 ml/min/g), self-gated diastole (0.64 +/- 0.26 ml/min/g), and ECG-gated scans (0.65 +/- 0.28 ml/min/g) were similar. The MBF values estimated from self-gated and gated methods were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The self-gated technique for quantification of regional myocardial perfusion matched ECG-gated perfusion measurements well in normal subjects at rest. Self-gated systolic perfusion values matched ECG-gated perfusion values better than did diastolic values.","bibdate":"Thu May 21 13:28:46 2015","pmcid":"PMC4325943","bibtex":"@Article{RSM:Lik2015,\n author = \"D. Likhite and G. Adluru and N. Hu and C. McGann and E.\n DiBella\",\n title = \"Quantification of myocardial perfusion with self-gated\n cardiovascular magnetic resonance.\",\n journal = \"J Cardiovasc Magn Reson\",\n year = \"2015\",\n volume = \"17\",\n number = \"1\",\n pages = \"14\",\n robnote = \"The use of a gated acquisition is a problem in situations\n with a poor ECG signal. An undersampled saturation\n recovery radial turboFLASH pulse sequence was used in 7\n subjects to acquire dynamic contrast-enhanced images\n during free-breathing. A single saturation pulse was\n followed by acquisition of 4-5 slices after a delay of ~40\n msec. Regional myocardial blood flow estimates\n (MBFs) obtained using self-gated systole (0.64 +/- 0.26\n ml/min/g), self-gated diastole (0.64 +/- 0.26 ml/min/g),\n and ECG-gated scans (0.65 +/- 0.28 ml/min/g) were similar.\n The MBF values\n estimated from self-gated and gated methods were not\n significantly different. CONCLUSION: The self-gated\n technique for quantification of regional myocardial\n perfusion matched ECG-gated perfusion measurements well in\n normal subjects at rest. Self-gated systolic perfusion\n values matched ECG-gated perfusion values better than did\n diastolic values.\",\n bibdate = \"Thu May 21 13:28:46 2015\",\n pmcid = \"PMC4325943\",\n}\n\n","author_short":["Likhite, D.","Adluru, G.","Hu, N.","McGann, C.","DiBella, E."],"key":"RSM:Lik2015","id":"RSM:Lik2015","bibbaseid":"likhite-adluru-hu-mcgann-dibella-quantificationofmyocardialperfusionwithselfgatedcardiovascularmagneticresonance-2015","role":"author","urls":{},"downloads":0,"html":""},"search_terms":["quantification","myocardial","perfusion","self","gated","cardiovascular","magnetic","resonance","likhite","adluru","hu","mcgann","dibella"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["5HG3Kp8zRwDd7FotB"]}