@InCollection{Lippert:2010Yearbook-2009,
  author           = {Ingmar Lippert},
  booktitle        = {Yearbook 2009 of the {Institute for Advanced Studies on Science, Technology and Society}},
  publisher        = {Profil},
  title            = {Disposed to Unsustainability? {E}cological Modernisation as a Techno-Science Enterprise with Conflicting Normative Orientations},
  year             = {2010},
  address          = {M{\"u}nchen},
  editor           = {Arno Bamm{\'e} and G{\"u}nter Getzinger and Bernhard Wieser},
  pages            = {275--290},
  abstract         = {In the 1970s widespread awareness of a ‘global environmental crisis’ began to emerge in Western societies. Specific staff were employed to deal with environmental problems. While they are supposed to manage the greening of their organisations, committed to sustainable development, research did not study these agents in their own right. By drawing on two ethnographic cases this paper questions whether their dispositions are likely to help in approaching sustainability. The paper then takes up Bourdieu’s concepts of habitus and field, a critical realist account of normativity and ANT’s emphasis of heterogeneity to argue that the agents have conflicting normative dispositions.},
  doi              = {10/bbm9},
  keywords         = {ecological modernisation, unsustainability, agency, environmental sociology},
  modificationdate = {2024-01-26T14:26:10},
}

{"_id":"PcejAG9wtfPE9zMNb","bibbaseid":"lippert-disposedtounsustainabilityecologicalmodernisationasatechnoscienceenterprisewithconflictingnormativeorientations-2010","author_short":["Lippert, I."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"incollection","type":"incollection","author":[{"firstnames":["Ingmar"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lippert"],"suffixes":[]}],"booktitle":"Yearbook 2009 of the Institute for Advanced Studies on Science, Technology and Society","publisher":"Profil","title":"Disposed to Unsustainability? Ecological Modernisation as a Techno-Science Enterprise with Conflicting Normative Orientations","year":"2010","address":"München","editor":[{"firstnames":["Arno"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bammé"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Günter"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Getzinger"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Bernhard"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Wieser"],"suffixes":[]}],"pages":"275–290","abstract":"In the 1970s widespread awareness of a ‘global environmental crisis’ began to emerge in Western societies. Specific staff were employed to deal with environmental problems. While they are supposed to manage the greening of their organisations, committed to sustainable development, research did not study these agents in their own right. By drawing on two ethnographic cases this paper questions whether their dispositions are likely to help in approaching sustainability. The paper then takes up Bourdieu’s concepts of habitus and field, a critical realist account of normativity and ANT’s emphasis of heterogeneity to argue that the agents have conflicting normative dispositions.","doi":"10/bbm9","keywords":"ecological modernisation, unsustainability, agency, environmental sociology","modificationdate":"2024-01-26T14:26:10","bibtex":"@InCollection{Lippert:2010Yearbook-2009,\r\n author = {Ingmar Lippert},\r\n booktitle = {Yearbook 2009 of the {Institute for Advanced Studies on Science, Technology and Society}},\r\n publisher = {Profil},\r\n title = {Disposed to Unsustainability? {E}cological Modernisation as a Techno-Science Enterprise with Conflicting Normative Orientations},\r\n year = {2010},\r\n address = {M{\\\"u}nchen},\r\n editor = {Arno Bamm{\\'e} and G{\\\"u}nter Getzinger and Bernhard Wieser},\r\n pages = {275--290},\r\n abstract = {In the 1970s widespread awareness of a ‘global environmental crisis’ began to emerge in Western societies. Specific staff were employed to deal with environmental problems. While they are supposed to manage the greening of their organisations, committed to sustainable development, research did not study these agents in their own right. By drawing on two ethnographic cases this paper questions whether their dispositions are likely to help in approaching sustainability. The paper then takes up Bourdieu’s concepts of habitus and field, a critical realist account of normativity and ANT’s emphasis of heterogeneity to argue that the agents have conflicting normative dispositions.},\r\n doi = {10/bbm9},\r\n keywords = {ecological modernisation, unsustainability, agency, environmental sociology},\r\n modificationdate = {2024-01-26T14:26:10},\r\n}\r\n\r\n","author_short":["Lippert, I."],"editor_short":["Bammé, A.","Getzinger, G.","Wieser, B."],"key":"Lippert:2010Yearbook-2009","id":"Lippert:2010Yearbook-2009","bibbaseid":"lippert-disposedtounsustainabilityecologicalmodernisationasatechnoscienceenterprisewithconflictingnormativeorientations-2010","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["ecological modernisation","unsustainability","agency","environmental sociology"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"incollection","biburl":"https://www.ingli.de/libraries/Literatur-web-biblatex-bookchapters.bib","dataSources":["s6kr9rJ4HFSWzCapo","DriNmvetLBu5DiBLu"],"keywords":["ecological modernisation","unsustainability","agency","environmental sociology"],"search_terms":["disposed","unsustainability","ecological","modernisation","techno","science","enterprise","conflicting","normative","orientations","lippert"],"title":"Disposed to Unsustainability? Ecological Modernisation as a Techno-Science Enterprise with Conflicting Normative Orientations","year":2010}