Coercion and Social Control. Lovell, A. M. In Dennis, D. L. & Monahan, J., editors, Coercion and Aggressive Community Treatment: A New Frontier in Mental Health Law, of The Springer Series in Social Clinical Psychology, pages 147–166. Springer US, Boston, MA, 1996. ![Coercion and Social Control [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex According to the philosopher Charles Taylor (1989), the moral origins of our viewpoints remain largely implicit until some challenge pushes them into the foreground. Coercion in involuntary hospitalization has been treated as a moral construct (Wertheimer, 1993), and preliminary research suggests that patients experience it as such (Bennett et al., 1993). Today, converging notions of person-centered care, individual rights, and the centrality of agency and personhood are shifting public debate in the United States from a focus on coercion in traditional, inpatient settings to evaluating its presence in community care. Opponents of coercive practices propose empowering alternatives, while proponents question whether psychiatric treatment is even possible without a sanctioned system of coercion (Gellner, cited in Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry, 1994). Research on the imposition of mental health interventions in community settings will not provide answers to the ethical questions raised. However, it can problematize coercion as a moral construct while examining its effect as a treatment strategy.
@incollection{lovell_coercion_1996,
address = {Boston, MA},
series = {The {Springer} {Series} in {Social} {Clinical} {Psychology}},
title = {Coercion and {Social} {Control}},
isbn = {978-1-4757-9727-5},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9727-5_10},
abstract = {According to the philosopher Charles Taylor (1989), the moral origins of our viewpoints remain largely implicit until some challenge pushes them into the foreground. Coercion in involuntary hospitalization has been treated as a moral construct (Wertheimer, 1993), and preliminary research suggests that patients experience it as such (Bennett et al., 1993). Today, converging notions of person-centered care, individual rights, and the centrality of agency and personhood are shifting public debate in the United States from a focus on coercion in traditional, inpatient settings to evaluating its presence in community care. Opponents of coercive practices propose empowering alternatives, while proponents question whether psychiatric treatment is even possible without a sanctioned system of coercion (Gellner, cited in Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry, 1994). Research on the imposition of mental health interventions in community settings will not provide answers to the ethical questions raised. However, it can problematize coercion as a moral construct while examining its effect as a treatment strategy.},
language = {en},
urldate = {2022-11-09},
booktitle = {Coercion and {Aggressive} {Community} {Treatment}: {A} {New} {Frontier} in {Mental} {Health} {Law}},
publisher = {Springer US},
author = {Lovell, Anne M.},
editor = {Dennis, Deborah L. and Monahan, John},
year = {1996},
doi = {10.1007/978-1-4757-9727-5_10},
keywords = {Assertive Community Treatment, Community Psychology, Cultural Distance, Mental Health, Social Control},
pages = {147--166},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"gNicH49BqhH2iwW2o","bibbaseid":"lovell-coercionandsocialcontrol-1996","author_short":["Lovell, A. M."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"incollection","type":"incollection","address":"Boston, MA","series":"The Springer Series in Social Clinical Psychology","title":"Coercion and Social Control","isbn":"978-1-4757-9727-5","url":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9727-5_10","abstract":"According to the philosopher Charles Taylor (1989), the moral origins of our viewpoints remain largely implicit until some challenge pushes them into the foreground. Coercion in involuntary hospitalization has been treated as a moral construct (Wertheimer, 1993), and preliminary research suggests that patients experience it as such (Bennett et al., 1993). Today, converging notions of person-centered care, individual rights, and the centrality of agency and personhood are shifting public debate in the United States from a focus on coercion in traditional, inpatient settings to evaluating its presence in community care. Opponents of coercive practices propose empowering alternatives, while proponents question whether psychiatric treatment is even possible without a sanctioned system of coercion (Gellner, cited in Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry, 1994). Research on the imposition of mental health interventions in community settings will not provide answers to the ethical questions raised. However, it can problematize coercion as a moral construct while examining its effect as a treatment strategy.","language":"en","urldate":"2022-11-09","booktitle":"Coercion and Aggressive Community Treatment: A New Frontier in Mental Health Law","publisher":"Springer US","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lovell"],"firstnames":["Anne","M."],"suffixes":[]}],"editor":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Dennis"],"firstnames":["Deborah","L."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Monahan"],"firstnames":["John"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"1996","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4757-9727-5_10","keywords":"Assertive Community Treatment, Community Psychology, Cultural Distance, Mental Health, Social Control","pages":"147–166","bibtex":"@incollection{lovell_coercion_1996,\n\taddress = {Boston, MA},\n\tseries = {The {Springer} {Series} in {Social} {Clinical} {Psychology}},\n\ttitle = {Coercion and {Social} {Control}},\n\tisbn = {978-1-4757-9727-5},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9727-5_10},\n\tabstract = {According to the philosopher Charles Taylor (1989), the moral origins of our viewpoints remain largely implicit until some challenge pushes them into the foreground. Coercion in involuntary hospitalization has been treated as a moral construct (Wertheimer, 1993), and preliminary research suggests that patients experience it as such (Bennett et al., 1993). Today, converging notions of person-centered care, individual rights, and the centrality of agency and personhood are shifting public debate in the United States from a focus on coercion in traditional, inpatient settings to evaluating its presence in community care. Opponents of coercive practices propose empowering alternatives, while proponents question whether psychiatric treatment is even possible without a sanctioned system of coercion (Gellner, cited in Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry, 1994). Research on the imposition of mental health interventions in community settings will not provide answers to the ethical questions raised. However, it can problematize coercion as a moral construct while examining its effect as a treatment strategy.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2022-11-09},\n\tbooktitle = {Coercion and {Aggressive} {Community} {Treatment}: {A} {New} {Frontier} in {Mental} {Health} {Law}},\n\tpublisher = {Springer US},\n\tauthor = {Lovell, Anne M.},\n\teditor = {Dennis, Deborah L. and Monahan, John},\n\tyear = {1996},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/978-1-4757-9727-5_10},\n\tkeywords = {Assertive Community Treatment, Community Psychology, Cultural Distance, Mental Health, Social Control},\n\tpages = {147--166},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Lovell, A. M."],"editor_short":["Dennis, D. L.","Monahan, J."],"key":"lovell_coercion_1996","id":"lovell_coercion_1996","bibbaseid":"lovell-coercionandsocialcontrol-1996","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9727-5_10"},"keyword":["Assertive Community Treatment","Community Psychology","Cultural Distance","Mental Health","Social Control"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"incollection","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero-group/Loic.rohr/4283170","dataSources":["4Q8J3EXw9tMaxiqyx"],"keywords":["assertive community treatment","community psychology","cultural distance","mental health","social control"],"search_terms":["coercion","social","control","lovell"],"title":"Coercion and Social Control","year":1996}