Trial protocol to compare the efficacy of a smartphone-based blood glucose management system with standard clinic care in the gestational diabetic population. Mackillop, L., H., Bartlett, K., Birks, J., Farmer, A., J., Gibson, O., J., Kevat, D., A., Kenworthy, Y., Levy, J., C., Loerup, L., Tarassenko, L., Velardo, C., & Hirst, J., E. BMJ Open, 6(3):e009702, British Medical Journal Publishing Group, 3, 2016. ![Trial protocol to compare the efficacy of a smartphone-based blood glucose management system with standard clinic care in the gestational diabetic population [pdf]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/pdf.svg "pdf")
Paper ![Trial protocol to compare the efficacy of a smartphone-based blood glucose management system with standard clinic care in the gestational diabetic population [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Website abstract bibtex INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is rising in the UK. Good glycaemic control improves maternal and neonatal outcomes. Frequent clinical review of patients with GDM by healthcare professionals is required owing to the rapidly changing physiology of pregnancy and its unpredictable course. Novel technologies that allow home blood glucose (BG) monitoring with results transmitted in real time to a healthcare professional have the potential to deliver good-quality healthcare to women more conveniently and at a lower cost to the patient and the healthcare provider compared to the conventional face-to-face or telephone-based consultation. We have developed an integrated GDm-health management system and aim to test the impact of using this system on maternal glycaemic control, costs, patient satisfaction and maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to standard clinic care in a single large publicly funded (National Health Service (NHS)) maternity unit. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Women with confirmed gestational diabetes in a current pregnancy are individually randomised to either the GDm-health system and half the normal clinic visits or normal clinic care. Primary outcome is mean BG in each group from recruitment to delivery calculated, with adjustments made for number of BG measurements, proportion of preprandial and postprandial readings and length of time in study, and compared between the groups. The secondary objective will be to compare the two groups for compliance to the allocated BG monitoring regime, maternal and neonatal outcomes, glycaemic control using glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and other BG metrics, and patient attitudes to care assessed using a questionnaire and resource use. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Thresholds for treatment, dietary advice and clinical management are the same in both groups. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated electronically and in print. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01916694; Pre-results.
@article{
title = {Trial protocol to compare the efficacy of a smartphone-based blood glucose management system with standard clinic care in the gestational diabetic population},
type = {article},
year = {2016},
identifiers = {[object Object]},
pages = {e009702},
volume = {6},
websites = {http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/3/e009702.abstract,http://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009702},
month = {3},
publisher = {British Medical Journal Publishing Group},
day = {17},
id = {dc80bac9-886c-3ebf-98e3-ad636aa2de11},
created = {2016-11-16T08:27:39.000Z},
accessed = {2016-04-28},
file_attached = {true},
profile_id = {ad751557-2a96-3bb6-b82f-87110274a523},
group_id = {a5618af6-b1cc-32f9-9537-d20b78f68bd4},
last_modified = {2016-11-16T08:28:15.000Z},
read = {true},
starred = {false},
authored = {true},
confirmed = {true},
hidden = {false},
citation_key = {mackillop2016trial},
source_type = {article},
abstract = {INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is rising in the UK. Good glycaemic control improves maternal and neonatal outcomes. Frequent clinical review of patients with GDM by healthcare professionals is required owing to the rapidly changing physiology of pregnancy and its unpredictable course. Novel technologies that allow home blood glucose (BG) monitoring with results transmitted in real time to a healthcare professional have the potential to deliver good-quality healthcare to women more conveniently and at a lower cost to the patient and the healthcare provider compared to the conventional face-to-face or telephone-based consultation. We have developed an integrated GDm-health management system and aim to test the impact of using this system on maternal glycaemic control, costs, patient satisfaction and maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to standard clinic care in a single large publicly funded (National Health Service (NHS)) maternity unit. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Women with confirmed gestational diabetes in a current pregnancy are individually randomised to either the GDm-health system and half the normal clinic visits or normal clinic care. Primary outcome is mean BG in each group from recruitment to delivery calculated, with adjustments made for number of BG measurements, proportion of preprandial and postprandial readings and length of time in study, and compared between the groups. The secondary objective will be to compare the two groups for compliance to the allocated BG monitoring regime, maternal and neonatal outcomes, glycaemic control using glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and other BG metrics, and patient attitudes to care assessed using a questionnaire and resource use. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Thresholds for treatment, dietary advice and clinical management are the same in both groups. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated electronically and in print. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01916694; Pre-results.},
bibtype = {article},
author = {Mackillop, Lucy H and Bartlett, Katy and Birks, Jacqueline and Farmer, Andrew J and Gibson, Oliver J and Kevat, Dev A and Kenworthy, Yvonne and Levy, Jonathan C and Loerup, Lise and Tarassenko, Lionel and Velardo, Carmelo and Hirst, Jane E},
journal = {BMJ Open},
number = {3}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"Eb6j3vkk38SdFu8Hg","bibbaseid":"mackillop-bartlett-birks-farmer-gibson-kevat-kenworthy-levy-etal-trialprotocoltocomparetheefficacyofasmartphonebasedbloodglucosemanagementsystemwithstandardcliniccareinthegestationaldiabeticpopulation-2016","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-11-16T08:29:38.154Z","title":"Trial protocol to compare the efficacy of a smartphone-based blood glucose management system with standard clinic care in the gestational diabetic population","author_short":["Mackillop, L., H.","Bartlett, K.","Birks, J.","Farmer, A., J.","Gibson, O., J.","Kevat, D., A.","Kenworthy, Y.","Levy, J., C.","Loerup, L.","Tarassenko, L.","Velardo, C.","Hirst, J., E."],"year":2016,"bibtype":"article","biburl":null,"bibdata":{"title":"Trial protocol to compare the efficacy of a smartphone-based blood glucose management system with standard clinic care in the gestational diabetic population","type":"article","year":"2016","identifiers":"[object Object]","pages":"e009702","volume":"6","websites":"http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/3/e009702.abstract,http://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009702","month":"3","publisher":"British Medical Journal Publishing Group","day":"17","id":"dc80bac9-886c-3ebf-98e3-ad636aa2de11","created":"2016-11-16T08:27:39.000Z","accessed":"2016-04-28","file_attached":"true","profile_id":"ad751557-2a96-3bb6-b82f-87110274a523","group_id":"a5618af6-b1cc-32f9-9537-d20b78f68bd4","last_modified":"2016-11-16T08:28:15.000Z","read":"true","starred":false,"authored":"true","confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"citation_key":"mackillop2016trial","source_type":"article","abstract":"INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is rising in the UK. Good glycaemic control improves maternal and neonatal outcomes. Frequent clinical review of patients with GDM by healthcare professionals is required owing to the rapidly changing physiology of pregnancy and its unpredictable course. Novel technologies that allow home blood glucose (BG) monitoring with results transmitted in real time to a healthcare professional have the potential to deliver good-quality healthcare to women more conveniently and at a lower cost to the patient and the healthcare provider compared to the conventional face-to-face or telephone-based consultation. We have developed an integrated GDm-health management system and aim to test the impact of using this system on maternal glycaemic control, costs, patient satisfaction and maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to standard clinic care in a single large publicly funded (National Health Service (NHS)) maternity unit. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Women with confirmed gestational diabetes in a current pregnancy are individually randomised to either the GDm-health system and half the normal clinic visits or normal clinic care. Primary outcome is mean BG in each group from recruitment to delivery calculated, with adjustments made for number of BG measurements, proportion of preprandial and postprandial readings and length of time in study, and compared between the groups. The secondary objective will be to compare the two groups for compliance to the allocated BG monitoring regime, maternal and neonatal outcomes, glycaemic control using glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and other BG metrics, and patient attitudes to care assessed using a questionnaire and resource use. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Thresholds for treatment, dietary advice and clinical management are the same in both groups. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated electronically and in print. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01916694; Pre-results.","bibtype":"article","author":"Mackillop, Lucy H and Bartlett, Katy and Birks, Jacqueline and Farmer, Andrew J and Gibson, Oliver J and Kevat, Dev A and Kenworthy, Yvonne and Levy, Jonathan C and Loerup, Lise and Tarassenko, Lionel and Velardo, Carmelo and Hirst, Jane E","journal":"BMJ Open","number":"3","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {Trial protocol to compare the efficacy of a smartphone-based blood glucose management system with standard clinic care in the gestational diabetic population},\n type = {article},\n year = {2016},\n identifiers = {[object Object]},\n pages = {e009702},\n volume = {6},\n websites = {http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/3/e009702.abstract,http://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009702},\n month = {3},\n publisher = {British Medical Journal Publishing Group},\n day = {17},\n id = {dc80bac9-886c-3ebf-98e3-ad636aa2de11},\n created = {2016-11-16T08:27:39.000Z},\n accessed = {2016-04-28},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {ad751557-2a96-3bb6-b82f-87110274a523},\n group_id = {a5618af6-b1cc-32f9-9537-d20b78f68bd4},\n last_modified = {2016-11-16T08:28:15.000Z},\n read = {true},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {true},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n citation_key = {mackillop2016trial},\n source_type = {article},\n abstract = {INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is rising in the UK. Good glycaemic control improves maternal and neonatal outcomes. Frequent clinical review of patients with GDM by healthcare professionals is required owing to the rapidly changing physiology of pregnancy and its unpredictable course. Novel technologies that allow home blood glucose (BG) monitoring with results transmitted in real time to a healthcare professional have the potential to deliver good-quality healthcare to women more conveniently and at a lower cost to the patient and the healthcare provider compared to the conventional face-to-face or telephone-based consultation. We have developed an integrated GDm-health management system and aim to test the impact of using this system on maternal glycaemic control, costs, patient satisfaction and maternal and neonatal outcomes compared to standard clinic care in a single large publicly funded (National Health Service (NHS)) maternity unit. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Women with confirmed gestational diabetes in a current pregnancy are individually randomised to either the GDm-health system and half the normal clinic visits or normal clinic care. Primary outcome is mean BG in each group from recruitment to delivery calculated, with adjustments made for number of BG measurements, proportion of preprandial and postprandial readings and length of time in study, and compared between the groups. The secondary objective will be to compare the two groups for compliance to the allocated BG monitoring regime, maternal and neonatal outcomes, glycaemic control using glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and other BG metrics, and patient attitudes to care assessed using a questionnaire and resource use. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Thresholds for treatment, dietary advice and clinical management are the same in both groups. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated electronically and in print. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01916694; Pre-results.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Mackillop, Lucy H and Bartlett, Katy and Birks, Jacqueline and Farmer, Andrew J and Gibson, Oliver J and Kevat, Dev A and Kenworthy, Yvonne and Levy, Jonathan C and Loerup, Lise and Tarassenko, Lionel and Velardo, Carmelo and Hirst, Jane E},\n journal = {BMJ Open},\n number = {3}\n}","author_short":["Mackillop, L., H.","Bartlett, K.","Birks, J.","Farmer, A., J.","Gibson, O., J.","Kevat, D., A.","Kenworthy, Y.","Levy, J., C.","Loerup, L.","Tarassenko, L.","Velardo, C.","Hirst, J., E."],"urls":{"Paper":"http://bibbase.org/service/mendeley/ad751557-2a96-3bb6-b82f-87110274a523/file/2649bc8c-1478-1547-107d-bb8f87b24312/2016-Trial_protocol_to_compare_the_efficacy_of_a_smartphone-based_blood_glucose_management_system_with_standard_clinic_c.pdf.pdf","Website":"http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/3/e009702.abstract,http://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009702"},"bibbaseid":"mackillop-bartlett-birks-farmer-gibson-kevat-kenworthy-levy-etal-trialprotocoltocomparetheefficacyofasmartphonebasedbloodglucosemanagementsystemwithstandardcliniccareinthegestationaldiabeticpopulation-2016","role":"author","downloads":0},"search_terms":["trial","protocol","compare","efficacy","smartphone","based","blood","glucose","management","system","standard","clinic","care","gestational","diabetic","population","mackillop","bartlett","birks","farmer","gibson","kevat","kenworthy","levy","loerup","tarassenko","velardo","hirst"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[]}