Psychobiological operationalization of RDoC constructs: Methodological and conceptual opportunities and challenges. MacNamara, A. & Phan, K L. Psychophysiology, 53(3):406--409, March, 2016. ![Psychobiological operationalization of RDoC constructs: Methodological and conceptual opportunities and challenges [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex NIMH's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project seeks to advance the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of mental disorders by promoting psychobiological research on dimensional constructs that might cut across traditional diagnostic boundaries (Kozak & Cuthbert, ). At the core of this approach is the notion that these dimensional constructs can be assessed across different units of analysis (e.g., genes, physiology, behavior), enriching the constructs and providing more complete explanations of clinical problems. While the conceptual aspects of RDoC have been discussed in several prior papers, its methodological aspects have received comparatively less attention. For example, how to integrate data from different units of analysis has been relatively unclear. Here, we discuss one means of psychobiologically operationalizing RDoC constructs across different units of analysis (the psychoneurometric approach; Yancey et al., ), highlighting ways in which this approach might be refined in future iterations. We conclude that there is much to be learned from this technique; however, greater attention to scale-development methods and to psychometrics will likely benefit this and other methodological approaches to combining measurements across multiple units of analysis.
@article{macnamara_psychobiological_2016,
title = {Psychobiological operationalization of {RDoC} constructs: {Methodological} and conceptual opportunities and challenges},
volume = {53},
issn = {0048-5772, 1540-5958},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12587},
doi = {10.1111/psyp.12587},
abstract = {NIMH's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project seeks to advance the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of mental disorders by promoting psychobiological research on dimensional constructs that might cut across traditional diagnostic boundaries (Kozak \& Cuthbert, ). At the core of this approach is the notion that these dimensional constructs can be assessed across different units of analysis (e.g., genes, physiology, behavior), enriching the constructs and providing more complete explanations of clinical problems. While the conceptual aspects of RDoC have been discussed in several prior papers, its methodological aspects have received comparatively less attention. For example, how to integrate data from different units of analysis has been relatively unclear. Here, we discuss one means of psychobiologically operationalizing RDoC constructs across different units of analysis (the psychoneurometric approach; Yancey et al., ), highlighting ways in which this approach might be refined in future iterations. We conclude that there is much to be learned from this technique; however, greater attention to scale-development methods and to psychometrics will likely benefit this and other methodological approaches to combining measurements across multiple units of analysis.},
language = {en},
number = {3},
journal = {Psychophysiology},
author = {MacNamara, Annmarie and Phan, K Luan},
month = mar,
year = {2016},
pmid = {26877133},
keywords = {Mental Health/Bioethics: Quality of Suffering, Psychoneurometrics, Threat sensitivity, Units of analysis, research domain criteria},
pages = {406--409}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"FRmKieN8sTWvCedRv","bibbaseid":"macnamara-phan-psychobiologicaloperationalizationofrdocconstructsmethodologicalandconceptualopportunitiesandchallenges-2016","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2018-03-15T15:56:58.790Z","title":"Psychobiological operationalization of RDoC constructs: Methodological and conceptual opportunities and challenges","author_short":["MacNamara, A.","Phan, K L."],"year":2016,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero/davidlloyd3","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Psychobiological operationalization of RDoC constructs: Methodological and conceptual opportunities and challenges","volume":"53","issn":"0048-5772, 1540-5958","url":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12587","doi":"10.1111/psyp.12587","abstract":"NIMH's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project seeks to advance the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of mental disorders by promoting psychobiological research on dimensional constructs that might cut across traditional diagnostic boundaries (Kozak & Cuthbert, ). At the core of this approach is the notion that these dimensional constructs can be assessed across different units of analysis (e.g., genes, physiology, behavior), enriching the constructs and providing more complete explanations of clinical problems. While the conceptual aspects of RDoC have been discussed in several prior papers, its methodological aspects have received comparatively less attention. For example, how to integrate data from different units of analysis has been relatively unclear. Here, we discuss one means of psychobiologically operationalizing RDoC constructs across different units of analysis (the psychoneurometric approach; Yancey et al., ), highlighting ways in which this approach might be refined in future iterations. We conclude that there is much to be learned from this technique; however, greater attention to scale-development methods and to psychometrics will likely benefit this and other methodological approaches to combining measurements across multiple units of analysis.","language":"en","number":"3","journal":"Psychophysiology","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["MacNamara"],"firstnames":["Annmarie"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Phan"],"firstnames":["K","Luan"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"March","year":"2016","pmid":"26877133","keywords":"Mental Health/Bioethics: Quality of Suffering, Psychoneurometrics, Threat sensitivity, Units of analysis, research domain criteria","pages":"406--409","bibtex":"@article{macnamara_psychobiological_2016,\n\ttitle = {Psychobiological operationalization of {RDoC} constructs: {Methodological} and conceptual opportunities and challenges},\n\tvolume = {53},\n\tissn = {0048-5772, 1540-5958},\n\turl = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12587},\n\tdoi = {10.1111/psyp.12587},\n\tabstract = {NIMH's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project seeks to advance the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of mental disorders by promoting psychobiological research on dimensional constructs that might cut across traditional diagnostic boundaries (Kozak \\& Cuthbert, ). At the core of this approach is the notion that these dimensional constructs can be assessed across different units of analysis (e.g., genes, physiology, behavior), enriching the constructs and providing more complete explanations of clinical problems. While the conceptual aspects of RDoC have been discussed in several prior papers, its methodological aspects have received comparatively less attention. For example, how to integrate data from different units of analysis has been relatively unclear. Here, we discuss one means of psychobiologically operationalizing RDoC constructs across different units of analysis (the psychoneurometric approach; Yancey et al., ), highlighting ways in which this approach might be refined in future iterations. We conclude that there is much to be learned from this technique; however, greater attention to scale-development methods and to psychometrics will likely benefit this and other methodological approaches to combining measurements across multiple units of analysis.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\tjournal = {Psychophysiology},\n\tauthor = {MacNamara, Annmarie and Phan, K Luan},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpmid = {26877133},\n\tkeywords = {Mental Health/Bioethics: Quality of Suffering, Psychoneurometrics, Threat sensitivity, Units of analysis, research domain criteria},\n\tpages = {406--409}\n}\n\n","author_short":["MacNamara, A.","Phan, K L."],"key":"macnamara_psychobiological_2016","id":"macnamara_psychobiological_2016","bibbaseid":"macnamara-phan-psychobiologicaloperationalizationofrdocconstructsmethodologicalandconceptualopportunitiesandchallenges-2016","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12587"},"keyword":["Mental Health/Bioethics: Quality of Suffering","Psychoneurometrics","Threat sensitivity","Units of analysis","research domain criteria"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["psychobiological","operationalization","rdoc","constructs","methodological","conceptual","opportunities","challenges","macnamara","phan"],"keywords":["mental health/bioethics: quality of suffering","psychoneurometrics","threat sensitivity","units of analysis","research domain criteria"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["kRLSZGSDAgwZPh2tM"]}