@ARTICLE{Maczka202116,
	author = {Maczka, Krzysztof and Matczak, Piotr and Jeran, Agnieszka and Chmielewski, Piotr Jerzy and Baker, Susan},
	title = {Conflicts in Ecosystem Services Management: Analysis of stakeholder participation in Natura 2000 in Poland},
	year = {2021},
	journal = {Environmental Science and Policy},
	volume = {117},
	pages = {16 – 24},
	doi = {10.1016/j.envsci.2021.01.001},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85099553107&doi=10.1016%2fj.envsci.2021.01.001&partnerID=40&md5=e3c13b5c4e060cc5bc79fe31ca7288a0},
	affiliations = {Faculty of Sociology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, ul. Szamarzewskiego 89c, Poznan, 60-568, Poland; “Artes Liberales” Faculty, University of Warsaw, ul. Dobra 72, Warsaw, 00-312, Poland; Sustainable Places Research Institute, Cardiff University, 33 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3BA, Wales, United Kingdom},
	abstract = {The relationship between specific ecosystem services (ES) and different types of conflicts are explored to aid understanding of the barriers to effective biodiversity conservation management. Drawing from conflict theory, content analysis is undertaken of public documents generated during consultations about Natura 2000 management that were conducted in Poland between 2010−2015. Results show the links between conflict over conservation planning and stakeholders’ perceptions of potential threats to their access to, and use of, particular ecosystem types. Cultural and provisioning ES generate more conflict, with conflict over cultural ES dominating. Conflict over the value of conservation itself was less prevalent, indicating a general agreement about the need for conservation planning. The lack of standardized procedures for reporting on public consultation process negatively effected institutional memory and limited the opportunities for learning lessons from past mistakes and from good practices. © 2021},
	author_keywords = {Biodiversity conservation; Land use policy; Protected areas; Public consultation; Stakeholder participation},
	keywords = {article; conservation biology; consultation; content analysis; drawing; ecosystem; human; human experiment; land use; learning; memory; perception; Poland; stakeholder engagement},
	correspondence_address = {K. Maczka; Faculty of Sociology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznan, ul. Szamarzewskiego 89c, 60-568, Poland; email: krzysztof.maczka@amu.edu.pl},
	publisher = {Elsevier Ltd},
	issn = {14629011},
	coden = {ESCPF},
	language = {English},
	abbrev_source_title = {Environ. Sci. Policy},
	type = {Article},
	publication_stage = {Final},
	source = {Scopus},
	note = {Cited by: 12; All Open Access, Hybrid Gold Open Access}
}

{"_id":"SKFL2SsksuHzmpthi","bibbaseid":"maczka-matczak-jeran-chmielewski-baker-conflictsinecosystemservicesmanagementanalysisofstakeholderparticipationinnatura2000inpoland-2021","author_short":["Maczka, K.","Matczak, P.","Jeran, A.","Chmielewski, P. J.","Baker, S."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"Article","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Maczka"],"firstnames":["Krzysztof"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Matczak"],"firstnames":["Piotr"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Jeran"],"firstnames":["Agnieszka"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Chmielewski"],"firstnames":["Piotr","Jerzy"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Baker"],"firstnames":["Susan"],"suffixes":[]}],"title":"Conflicts in Ecosystem Services Management: Analysis of stakeholder participation in Natura 2000 in Poland","year":"2021","journal":"Environmental Science and Policy","volume":"117","pages":"16 – 24","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2021.01.001","url":"https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85099553107&doi=10.1016%2fj.envsci.2021.01.001&partnerID=40&md5=e3c13b5c4e060cc5bc79fe31ca7288a0","affiliations":"Faculty of Sociology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, ul. Szamarzewskiego 89c, Poznan, 60-568, Poland; “Artes Liberales” Faculty, University of Warsaw, ul. Dobra 72, Warsaw, 00-312, Poland; Sustainable Places Research Institute, Cardiff University, 33 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3BA, Wales, United Kingdom","abstract":"The relationship between specific ecosystem services (ES) and different types of conflicts are explored to aid understanding of the barriers to effective biodiversity conservation management. Drawing from conflict theory, content analysis is undertaken of public documents generated during consultations about Natura 2000 management that were conducted in Poland between 2010−2015. Results show the links between conflict over conservation planning and stakeholders’ perceptions of potential threats to their access to, and use of, particular ecosystem types. Cultural and provisioning ES generate more conflict, with conflict over cultural ES dominating. Conflict over the value of conservation itself was less prevalent, indicating a general agreement about the need for conservation planning. The lack of standardized procedures for reporting on public consultation process negatively effected institutional memory and limited the opportunities for learning lessons from past mistakes and from good practices. © 2021","author_keywords":"Biodiversity conservation; Land use policy; Protected areas; Public consultation; Stakeholder participation","keywords":"article; conservation biology; consultation; content analysis; drawing; ecosystem; human; human experiment; land use; learning; memory; perception; Poland; stakeholder engagement","correspondence_address":"K. Maczka; Faculty of Sociology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznan, ul. Szamarzewskiego 89c, 60-568, Poland; email: krzysztof.maczka@amu.edu.pl","publisher":"Elsevier Ltd","issn":"14629011","coden":"ESCPF","language":"English","abbrev_source_title":"Environ. Sci. Policy","publication_stage":"Final","source":"Scopus","note":"Cited by: 12; All Open Access, Hybrid Gold Open Access","bibtex":"@ARTICLE{Maczka202116,\n\tauthor = {Maczka, Krzysztof and Matczak, Piotr and Jeran, Agnieszka and Chmielewski, Piotr Jerzy and Baker, Susan},\n\ttitle = {Conflicts in Ecosystem Services Management: Analysis of stakeholder participation in Natura 2000 in Poland},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tjournal = {Environmental Science and Policy},\n\tvolume = {117},\n\tpages = {16 – 24},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.envsci.2021.01.001},\n\turl = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85099553107&doi=10.1016%2fj.envsci.2021.01.001&partnerID=40&md5=e3c13b5c4e060cc5bc79fe31ca7288a0},\n\taffiliations = {Faculty of Sociology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, ul. Szamarzewskiego 89c, Poznan, 60-568, Poland; “Artes Liberales” Faculty, University of Warsaw, ul. Dobra 72, Warsaw, 00-312, Poland; Sustainable Places Research Institute, Cardiff University, 33 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3BA, Wales, United Kingdom},\n\tabstract = {The relationship between specific ecosystem services (ES) and different types of conflicts are explored to aid understanding of the barriers to effective biodiversity conservation management. Drawing from conflict theory, content analysis is undertaken of public documents generated during consultations about Natura 2000 management that were conducted in Poland between 2010−2015. Results show the links between conflict over conservation planning and stakeholders’ perceptions of potential threats to their access to, and use of, particular ecosystem types. Cultural and provisioning ES generate more conflict, with conflict over cultural ES dominating. Conflict over the value of conservation itself was less prevalent, indicating a general agreement about the need for conservation planning. The lack of standardized procedures for reporting on public consultation process negatively effected institutional memory and limited the opportunities for learning lessons from past mistakes and from good practices. © 2021},\n\tauthor_keywords = {Biodiversity conservation; Land use policy; Protected areas; Public consultation; Stakeholder participation},\n\tkeywords = {article; conservation biology; consultation; content analysis; drawing; ecosystem; human; human experiment; land use; learning; memory; perception; Poland; stakeholder engagement},\n\tcorrespondence_address = {K. Maczka; Faculty of Sociology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznan, ul. Szamarzewskiego 89c, 60-568, Poland; email: krzysztof.maczka@amu.edu.pl},\n\tpublisher = {Elsevier Ltd},\n\tissn = {14629011},\n\tcoden = {ESCPF},\n\tlanguage = {English},\n\tabbrev_source_title = {Environ. Sci. Policy},\n\ttype = {Article},\n\tpublication_stage = {Final},\n\tsource = {Scopus},\n\tnote = {Cited by: 12; All Open Access, Hybrid Gold Open Access}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Maczka, K.","Matczak, P.","Jeran, A.","Chmielewski, P. J.","Baker, S."],"bibbaseid":"maczka-matczak-jeran-chmielewski-baker-conflictsinecosystemservicesmanagementanalysisofstakeholderparticipationinnatura2000inpoland-2021","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85099553107&doi=10.1016%2fj.envsci.2021.01.001&partnerID=40&md5=e3c13b5c4e060cc5bc79fe31ca7288a0"},"keyword":["article; conservation biology; consultation; content analysis; drawing; ecosystem; human; human experiment; land use; learning; memory; perception; Poland; stakeholder engagement"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/f/akvPCQYE74MCSypqX/scopus natura 2000.bib","dataSources":["jEMMcdj2v9At9Q5md"],"keywords":["article; conservation biology; consultation; content analysis; drawing; ecosystem; human; human experiment; land use; learning; memory; perception; poland; stakeholder engagement"],"search_terms":["conflicts","ecosystem","services","management","analysis","stakeholder","participation","natura","2000","poland","maczka","matczak","jeran","chmielewski","baker"],"title":"Conflicts in Ecosystem Services Management: Analysis of stakeholder participation in Natura 2000 in Poland","year":2021}