From “Nasa Lies” to “Reptilian Eyes”: Mapping Communication About 10 Conspiracy Theories, Their Communities, and Main Propagators on Twitter. Mahl, D., Zeng, J., & Schäfer, M. S. Social Media + Society, 7(2):20563051211017482, April, 2021. Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd
From “Nasa Lies” to “Reptilian Eyes”: Mapping Communication About 10 Conspiracy Theories, Their Communities, and Main Propagators on Twitter [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
In recent years, conspiracy theories have pervaded mainstream discourse. Social media, in particular, reinforce their visibility and propagation. However, most prior studies on the dissemination of conspiracy theories in digital environments have focused on individual cases or conspiracy theories as a generic phenomenon. Our research addresses this gap by comparing the 10 most prominent conspiracy theories on Twitter, the communities supporting them, and their main propagators. Drawing on a dataset of 106,807 tweets published over 6 weeks from 2018 to 2019, we combine large-scale network analysis and in-depth qualitative analysis of user profiles. Our findings illustrate which conspiracy theories are prevalent on Twitter, and how different conspiracy theories are separated or interconnected within communities. In addition, our study provides empirical support for previous assertions that extremist accounts are being “deplatformed” by leading social media companies. We also discuss how the implications of these findings elucidate the role of societal and political contexts in propagating conspiracy theories on social media.
@article{mahl_nasa_2021,
	title = {From “{Nasa} {Lies}” to “{Reptilian} {Eyes}”: {Mapping} {Communication} {About} 10 {Conspiracy} {Theories}, {Their} {Communities}, and {Main} {Propagators} on {Twitter}},
	volume = {7},
	issn = {2056-3051},
	shorttitle = {From “{Nasa} {Lies}” to “{Reptilian} {Eyes}”},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211017482},
	doi = {10/gmfvkp},
	abstract = {In recent years, conspiracy theories have pervaded mainstream discourse. Social media, in particular, reinforce their visibility and propagation. However, most prior studies on the dissemination of conspiracy theories in digital environments have focused on individual cases or conspiracy theories as a generic phenomenon. Our research addresses this gap by comparing the 10 most prominent conspiracy theories on Twitter, the communities supporting them, and their main propagators. Drawing on a dataset of 106,807 tweets published over 6 weeks from 2018 to 2019, we combine large-scale network analysis and in-depth qualitative analysis of user profiles. Our findings illustrate which conspiracy theories are prevalent on Twitter, and how different conspiracy theories are separated or interconnected within communities. In addition, our study provides empirical support for previous assertions that extremist accounts are being “deplatformed” by leading social media companies. We also discuss how the implications of these findings elucidate the role of societal and political contexts in propagating conspiracy theories on social media.},
	language = {en},
	number = {2},
	urldate = {2021-08-17},
	journal = {Social Media + Society},
	author = {Mahl, Daniela and Zeng, Jing and Schäfer, Mike S.},
	month = apr,
	year = {2021},
	note = {Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd},
	keywords = {Twitter, conspiracy theory, notion, social media},
	pages = {20563051211017482},
}

Downloads: 0