Metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive monitoring, and singular (coherent) vs multiple (incoherent) model of attachment: Findings and directions for future research. Main, M. In Parkes, C. M., Stevenson-Hinde, J., & Marris, P., editors, Attachment across the life cycle., pages 127–159. Tavistock/Routledge, New York, NY, 1991.
Paper abstract bibtex this chapter concerns some potential relations between metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive functioning, and processes related to attachment / following a review of recent work concerning metacognition, representation, and mental models, I suggest that difficulties with the 'appearance-reality' distinction and the dual coding of single entities will make a young child vulnerable to responding to unfavorable attachment experiences by developing 'multiple (conflicting or incompatible) models' of attachment discuss individual differences in the narratives which adults produce during structured, hour-long interviews regarding their own attachment histories / when a parent presents a coherent singular model of her attachment history, the infant is typically judged 'secure' on the basis of its behavioral response to that parent in structured separation-and-reunion observation / when a parent presents instead incoherent, multiple models of her experience and its influence, or implausible ideation, the infant is typically judged insecure in this observation our pilot studies are indicating relatively advanced metacognitive monitoring in secure children, difficulties with accessing early memories in insecure children, and . . . failure to comprehend the privacy of thought in 6-year-olds judged insecure-ambivalent with mother (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
@incollection{main_metacognitive_1991,
address = {New York, NY},
title = {Metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive monitoring, and singular (coherent) vs multiple (incoherent) model of attachment: {Findings} and directions for future research},
isbn = {0-415-05650-0},
url = {https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,uid&db=psyh&AN=1991-98002-008&site=ehost-live},
abstract = {this chapter concerns some potential relations between metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive functioning, and processes related to attachment / following a review of recent work concerning metacognition, representation, and mental models, I suggest that difficulties with the 'appearance-reality' distinction and the dual coding of single entities will make a young child vulnerable to responding to unfavorable attachment experiences by developing 'multiple (conflicting or incompatible) models' of attachment discuss individual differences in the narratives which adults produce during structured, hour-long interviews regarding their own attachment histories / when a parent presents a coherent singular model of her attachment history, the infant is typically judged 'secure' on the basis of its behavioral response to that parent in structured separation-and-reunion observation / when a parent presents instead incoherent, multiple models of her experience and its influence, or implausible ideation, the infant is typically judged insecure in this observation our pilot studies are indicating relatively advanced metacognitive monitoring in secure children, difficulties with accessing early memories in insecure children, and . . . failure to comprehend the privacy of thought in 6-year-olds judged insecure-ambivalent with mother (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)},
booktitle = {Attachment across the life cycle.},
publisher = {Tavistock/Routledge},
author = {Main, Mary},
editor = {Parkes, Colin Murray and Stevenson-Hinde, Joan and Marris, Peter},
year = {1991},
keywords = {Attachment Behavior, Early Memories, Emotional Development, Emotional Security, Individual Differences, Metacognition, Mother Child Relations, examines metacognition knowledge \& metacognitive functioning in relation to mother-child attachment behavior},
pages = {127--159},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"cB5tYkaYzFeyh5Fuz","bibbaseid":"main-metacognitiveknowledgemetacognitivemonitoringandsingularcoherentvsmultipleincoherentmodelofattachmentfindingsanddirectionsforfutureresearch-1991","author_short":["Main, M."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"incollection","type":"incollection","address":"New York, NY","title":"Metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive monitoring, and singular (coherent) vs multiple (incoherent) model of attachment: Findings and directions for future research","isbn":"0-415-05650-0","url":"https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,uid&db=psyh&AN=1991-98002-008&site=ehost-live","abstract":"this chapter concerns some potential relations between metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive functioning, and processes related to attachment / following a review of recent work concerning metacognition, representation, and mental models, I suggest that difficulties with the 'appearance-reality' distinction and the dual coding of single entities will make a young child vulnerable to responding to unfavorable attachment experiences by developing 'multiple (conflicting or incompatible) models' of attachment discuss individual differences in the narratives which adults produce during structured, hour-long interviews regarding their own attachment histories / when a parent presents a coherent singular model of her attachment history, the infant is typically judged 'secure' on the basis of its behavioral response to that parent in structured separation-and-reunion observation / when a parent presents instead incoherent, multiple models of her experience and its influence, or implausible ideation, the infant is typically judged insecure in this observation our pilot studies are indicating relatively advanced metacognitive monitoring in secure children, difficulties with accessing early memories in insecure children, and . . . failure to comprehend the privacy of thought in 6-year-olds judged insecure-ambivalent with mother (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)","booktitle":"Attachment across the life cycle.","publisher":"Tavistock/Routledge","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Main"],"firstnames":["Mary"],"suffixes":[]}],"editor":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Parkes"],"firstnames":["Colin","Murray"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Stevenson-Hinde"],"firstnames":["Joan"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Marris"],"firstnames":["Peter"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"1991","keywords":"Attachment Behavior, Early Memories, Emotional Development, Emotional Security, Individual Differences, Metacognition, Mother Child Relations, examines metacognition knowledge & metacognitive functioning in relation to mother-child attachment behavior","pages":"127–159","bibtex":"@incollection{main_metacognitive_1991,\n\taddress = {New York, NY},\n\ttitle = {Metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive monitoring, and singular (coherent) vs multiple (incoherent) model of attachment: {Findings} and directions for future research},\n\tisbn = {0-415-05650-0},\n\turl = {https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,uid&db=psyh&AN=1991-98002-008&site=ehost-live},\n\tabstract = {this chapter concerns some potential relations between metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive functioning, and processes related to attachment / following a review of recent work concerning metacognition, representation, and mental models, I suggest that difficulties with the 'appearance-reality' distinction and the dual coding of single entities will make a young child vulnerable to responding to unfavorable attachment experiences by developing 'multiple (conflicting or incompatible) models' of attachment discuss individual differences in the narratives which adults produce during structured, hour-long interviews regarding their own attachment histories / when a parent presents a coherent singular model of her attachment history, the infant is typically judged 'secure' on the basis of its behavioral response to that parent in structured separation-and-reunion observation / when a parent presents instead incoherent, multiple models of her experience and its influence, or implausible ideation, the infant is typically judged insecure in this observation our pilot studies are indicating relatively advanced metacognitive monitoring in secure children, difficulties with accessing early memories in insecure children, and . . . failure to comprehend the privacy of thought in 6-year-olds judged insecure-ambivalent with mother (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)},\n\tbooktitle = {Attachment across the life cycle.},\n\tpublisher = {Tavistock/Routledge},\n\tauthor = {Main, Mary},\n\teditor = {Parkes, Colin Murray and Stevenson-Hinde, Joan and Marris, Peter},\n\tyear = {1991},\n\tkeywords = {Attachment Behavior, Early Memories, Emotional Development, Emotional Security, Individual Differences, Metacognition, Mother Child Relations, examines metacognition knowledge \\& metacognitive functioning in relation to mother-child attachment behavior},\n\tpages = {127--159},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Main, M."],"editor_short":["Parkes, C. M.","Stevenson-Hinde, J.","Marris, P."],"key":"main_metacognitive_1991","id":"main_metacognitive_1991","bibbaseid":"main-metacognitiveknowledgemetacognitivemonitoringandsingularcoherentvsmultipleincoherentmodelofattachmentfindingsanddirectionsforfutureresearch-1991","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,uid&db=psyh&AN=1991-98002-008&site=ehost-live"},"keyword":["Attachment Behavior","Early Memories","Emotional Development","Emotional Security","Individual Differences","Metacognition","Mother Child Relations","examines metacognition knowledge & metacognitive functioning in relation to mother-child attachment behavior"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"incollection","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/saurabhr","dataSources":["nxjWwW7fWbb5tfpKz"],"keywords":["attachment behavior","early memories","emotional development","emotional security","individual differences","metacognition","mother child relations","examines metacognition knowledge & metacognitive functioning in relation to mother-child attachment behavior"],"search_terms":["metacognitive","knowledge","metacognitive","monitoring","singular","coherent","multiple","incoherent","model","attachment","findings","directions","future","research","main"],"title":"Metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive monitoring, and singular (coherent) vs multiple (incoherent) model of attachment: Findings and directions for future research","year":1991}