Economic evaluation of implementation science outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review. Malhotra, A., Thompson, R. R., Kagoya, F., Masiye, F., Mbewe, P., Mosepele, M., Phiri, J., Sambo, J., Barker, A., Cameron, D. B., Davila-Roman, V. G., Effah, W., Hutchinson, B., Laxy, M., Newsome, B., Watkins, D., Sohn, H., & Dowdy, D. W. Implementation Science, 17(1):76, November, 2022.
Economic evaluation of implementation science outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
Historically, the focus of cost-effectiveness analyses has been on the costs to operate and deliver interventions after their initial design and launch. The costs related to design and implementation of interventions have often been omitted. Ignoring these costs leads to an underestimation of the true price of interventions and biases economic analyses toward favoring new interventions. This is especially true in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where implementation may require substantial up-front investment. This scoping review was conducted to explore the topics, depth, and availability of scientific literature on integrating implementation science into economic evaluations of health interventions in LMICs.
@article{malhotra_economic_2022,
	title = {Economic evaluation of implementation science outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review},
	volume = {17},
	issn = {1748-5908},
	shorttitle = {Economic evaluation of implementation science outcomes in low- and middle-income countries},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01248-x},
	doi = {10.1186/s13012-022-01248-x},
	abstract = {Historically, the focus of cost-effectiveness analyses has been on the costs to operate and deliver interventions after their initial design and launch. The costs related to design and implementation of interventions have often been omitted. Ignoring these costs leads to an underestimation of the true price of interventions and biases economic analyses toward favoring new interventions. This is especially true in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where implementation may require substantial up-front investment. This scoping review was conducted to explore the topics, depth, and availability of scientific literature on integrating implementation science into economic evaluations of health interventions in LMICs.},
	number = {1},
	urldate = {2022-11-18},
	journal = {Implementation Science},
	author = {Malhotra, Akash and Thompson, Ryan R. and Kagoya, Faith and Masiye, Felix and Mbewe, Peter and Mosepele, Mosepele and Phiri, Jane and Sambo, Jairos and Barker, Abigail and Cameron, Drew B. and Davila-Roman, Victor G. and Effah, William and Hutchinson, Brian and Laxy, Michael and Newsome, Brad and Watkins, David and Sohn, Hojoon and Dowdy, David W.},
	month = nov,
	year = {2022},
	keywords = {Libre accès},
	pages = {76},
}

Downloads: 0