@article{
 title = {Evidence-based medicine – an appropriate tool for evidence-based health policy? A case study from Norway},
 type = {article},
 year = {2016},
 identifiers = {[object Object]},
 pages = {1-9},
 volume = {14},
 websites = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0088-1},
 id = {d001ba37-398d-3dae-8e4b-2c16913bebce},
 created = {2016-08-21T22:18:04.000Z},
 file_attached = {false},
 profile_id = {217ced55-4c79-38dc-838b-4b5ea8df5597},
 group_id = {408d37d9-5f1b-3398-a9f5-5c1a487116d4},
 last_modified = {2017-03-14T09:54:45.334Z},
 read = {false},
 starred = {false},
 authored = {false},
 confirmed = {true},
 hidden = {false},
 source_type = {JOUR},
 notes = {ID: Malterud2016},
 folder_uuids = {ec36662d-17c1-48e1-ba80-71a9f974e552},
 private_publication = {false},
 abstract = {Evidence-based policy (EBP), a concept modelled on the principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM), is widely used in different areas of policymaking. Systematic reviews (SRs) with meta-analyses gradually became the methods of choice for synthesizing research evidence about interventions and judgements about quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Critics have argued that the relation between research evidence and service policies is weak, and that the notion of EBP rests on a misunderstanding of policy processes. Having explored EBM standards and knowledge requirements for health policy decision-making, we present an empirical point of departure for discussing the relationship between EBM and EBP.},
 bibtype = {article},
 author = {Malterud, Kirsti and Bjelland, Anne Karen and Elvbakken, Kari Tove},
 journal = {Health Research Policy and Systems},
 number = {1}
}

{"_id":"A2MJ8xcjnd9LKiy8a","bibbaseid":"malterud-bjelland-elvbakken-evidencebasedmedicineanappropriatetoolforevidencebasedhealthpolicyacasestudyfromnorway-2016","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2017-11-23T19:05:20.534Z","title":"Evidence-based medicine – an appropriate tool for evidence-based health policy? A case study from Norway","author_short":["Malterud, K.","Bjelland, A., K.","Elvbakken, K., T."],"year":2016,"bibtype":"article","biburl":null,"bibdata":{"title":"Evidence-based medicine – an appropriate tool for evidence-based health policy? A case study from Norway","type":"article","year":"2016","identifiers":"[object Object]","pages":"1-9","volume":"14","websites":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0088-1","id":"d001ba37-398d-3dae-8e4b-2c16913bebce","created":"2016-08-21T22:18:04.000Z","file_attached":false,"profile_id":"217ced55-4c79-38dc-838b-4b5ea8df5597","group_id":"408d37d9-5f1b-3398-a9f5-5c1a487116d4","last_modified":"2017-03-14T09:54:45.334Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":false,"confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"source_type":"JOUR","notes":"ID: Malterud2016","folder_uuids":"ec36662d-17c1-48e1-ba80-71a9f974e552","private_publication":false,"abstract":"Evidence-based policy (EBP), a concept modelled on the principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM), is widely used in different areas of policymaking. Systematic reviews (SRs) with meta-analyses gradually became the methods of choice for synthesizing research evidence about interventions and judgements about quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Critics have argued that the relation between research evidence and service policies is weak, and that the notion of EBP rests on a misunderstanding of policy processes. Having explored EBM standards and knowledge requirements for health policy decision-making, we present an empirical point of departure for discussing the relationship between EBM and EBP.","bibtype":"article","author":"Malterud, Kirsti and Bjelland, Anne Karen and Elvbakken, Kari Tove","journal":"Health Research Policy and Systems","number":"1","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {Evidence-based medicine – an appropriate tool for evidence-based health policy? A case study from Norway},\n type = {article},\n year = {2016},\n identifiers = {[object Object]},\n pages = {1-9},\n volume = {14},\n websites = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0088-1},\n id = {d001ba37-398d-3dae-8e4b-2c16913bebce},\n created = {2016-08-21T22:18:04.000Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {217ced55-4c79-38dc-838b-4b5ea8df5597},\n group_id = {408d37d9-5f1b-3398-a9f5-5c1a487116d4},\n last_modified = {2017-03-14T09:54:45.334Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {JOUR},\n notes = {ID: Malterud2016},\n folder_uuids = {ec36662d-17c1-48e1-ba80-71a9f974e552},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Evidence-based policy (EBP), a concept modelled on the principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM), is widely used in different areas of policymaking. Systematic reviews (SRs) with meta-analyses gradually became the methods of choice for synthesizing research evidence about interventions and judgements about quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Critics have argued that the relation between research evidence and service policies is weak, and that the notion of EBP rests on a misunderstanding of policy processes. Having explored EBM standards and knowledge requirements for health policy decision-making, we present an empirical point of departure for discussing the relationship between EBM and EBP.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Malterud, Kirsti and Bjelland, Anne Karen and Elvbakken, Kari Tove},\n journal = {Health Research Policy and Systems},\n number = {1}\n}","author_short":["Malterud, K.","Bjelland, A., K.","Elvbakken, K., T."],"urls":{"Website":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0088-1"},"bibbaseid":"malterud-bjelland-elvbakken-evidencebasedmedicineanappropriatetoolforevidencebasedhealthpolicyacasestudyfromnorway-2016","role":"author","downloads":0},"search_terms":["evidence","based","medicine","appropriate","tool","evidence","based","health","policy","case","study","norway","malterud","bjelland","elvbakken"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[]}