@article{malyska_role_????,
	title = {The {Role} of {Public} {Opinion} in {Shaping} {Trajectories} of {Agricultural} {Biotechnology}},
	issn = {0167-7799},
	url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167779916000676},
	doi = {10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.005},
	abstract = {Science and technology are not autonomous entities and research trajectories are largely influenced by public opinion. The role of political decisions becomes especially evident in light of rapidly developing new breeding techniques (NBTs) and other genome editing methods for crop improvement. Decisions on how those new techniques should be regulated may not be based entirely on scientific rationale, and even if it is decided that crops produced by NBTs do not fall under the umbrella of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), their commercialization is by no means certain at this time. If and when adopted regulations do not comply with the public's perception of risks, policy makers will find themselves under pressure to ban or restrict the use of the respective products.},
	urldate = {2016-04-11},
	journal = {Trends in Biotechnology},
	author = {Malyska, Aleksandra and Bolla, Robert and Twardowski, Tomasz},
	keywords = {genome editing, new breeding techniques, Society},
	file = {ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:files/54352/Malyska et al. - The Role of Public Opinion in Shaping Trajectories.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:files/54355/S0167779916000676.html:text/html}
}

{"_id":"peWYqFrQ47xXnEFCG","bibbaseid":"malyska-bolla-twardowski-theroleofpublicopinioninshapingtrajectoriesofagriculturalbiotechnology","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-09-09T06:27:35.647Z","title":"The Role of Public Opinion in Shaping Trajectories of Agricultural Biotechnology","author_short":["Malyska, A.","Bolla, R.","Twardowski, T."],"year":null,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://www.sfu.ca/~howlett/howlett16.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"The Role of Public Opinion in Shaping Trajectories of Agricultural Biotechnology","issn":"0167-7799","url":"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167779916000676","doi":"10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.005","abstract":"Science and technology are not autonomous entities and research trajectories are largely influenced by public opinion. The role of political decisions becomes especially evident in light of rapidly developing new breeding techniques (NBTs) and other genome editing methods for crop improvement. Decisions on how those new techniques should be regulated may not be based entirely on scientific rationale, and even if it is decided that crops produced by NBTs do not fall under the umbrella of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), their commercialization is by no means certain at this time. If and when adopted regulations do not comply with the public's perception of risks, policy makers will find themselves under pressure to ban or restrict the use of the respective products.","urldate":"2016-04-11","journal":"Trends in Biotechnology","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Malyska"],"firstnames":["Aleksandra"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bolla"],"firstnames":["Robert"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Twardowski"],"firstnames":["Tomasz"],"suffixes":[]}],"keywords":"genome editing, new breeding techniques, Society","file":"ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:files/54352/Malyska et al. - The Role of Public Opinion in Shaping Trajectories.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:files/54355/S0167779916000676.html:text/html","bibtex":"@article{malyska_role_????,\n\ttitle = {The {Role} of {Public} {Opinion} in {Shaping} {Trajectories} of {Agricultural} {Biotechnology}},\n\tissn = {0167-7799},\n\turl = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167779916000676},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.005},\n\tabstract = {Science and technology are not autonomous entities and research trajectories are largely influenced by public opinion. The role of political decisions becomes especially evident in light of rapidly developing new breeding techniques (NBTs) and other genome editing methods for crop improvement. Decisions on how those new techniques should be regulated may not be based entirely on scientific rationale, and even if it is decided that crops produced by NBTs do not fall under the umbrella of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), their commercialization is by no means certain at this time. If and when adopted regulations do not comply with the public's perception of risks, policy makers will find themselves under pressure to ban or restrict the use of the respective products.},\n\turldate = {2016-04-11},\n\tjournal = {Trends in Biotechnology},\n\tauthor = {Malyska, Aleksandra and Bolla, Robert and Twardowski, Tomasz},\n\tkeywords = {genome editing, new breeding techniques, Society},\n\tfile = {ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:files/54352/Malyska et al. - The Role of Public Opinion in Shaping Trajectories.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:files/54355/S0167779916000676.html:text/html}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Malyska, A.","Bolla, R.","Twardowski, T."],"key":"malyska_role_????","id":"malyska_role_????","bibbaseid":"malyska-bolla-twardowski-theroleofpublicopinioninshapingtrajectoriesofagriculturalbiotechnology","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167779916000676"},"keyword":["genome editing","new breeding techniques","Society"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["role","public","opinion","shaping","trajectories","agricultural","biotechnology","malyska","bolla","twardowski"],"keywords":["genome editing","new breeding techniques","society"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["Bn7xRaKMY43f7hFwh"]}