@inproceedings{Marfil2016,
abstract = {Robots require a close coupling of perception and action. Cognitive robots go beyond this to require a further coupling with cognition. From the perspective of robotics, this coupling generally emphasizes a tightly integrated perceptuomo- tor system, which is then loosely connected to some limited form of cognitive system such as a planner. At the other end, from the perspective of automated planning, the emphasis is on a highly functional system that, taken to its extreme, calls perceptual and motor modules as independent functions. This paper proposes to join both perspectives through a unique representation where the responses of all modules on the software architecture (percepts or actions) are grounded using the same set of symbols. This allows to generalize the signal-to-symbol divide that separates classic perceptuomotor and automated planning systems, being the result a software architecture where all software modules interact using the same tokens.},
author = {Marfil, Rebeca and Manso, Luis J and Bandera, Juan Pedro and Romero-Garc{\'{e}}s, Adrian and Bandera, Antonio and Bustos, Pablo and Calderita, Luis Vicente and Gonz{\'{a}}lez, Jos{\'{e}} Carlos and Garc{\'{i}}a-Olaya, Angel and Fuentetaja, Raquel and Fern{\'{a}}ndez, Fernando},
booktitle = {Workshop of Physical Agents 2016},
file = {:C$\backslash$:/Users/angel/Documents/Mendeley Desktop/Marfil et al. - 2016 - Percepts symbols or Action symbols Generalizing how all modules interact within a software architecture for cogni.pdf:pdf},
number = {June},
pages = {9--16},
title = {{Percepts symbols or Action symbols? Generalizing how all modules interact within a software architecture for cognitive robotics}},
year = {2016}
}

{"_id":"bb65ftS7ZrHoFECsd","bibbaseid":"marfil-manso-bandera-romerogarcs-bandera-bustos-calderita-gonzlez-etal-perceptssymbolsoractionsymbolsgeneralizinghowallmodulesinteractwithinasoftwarearchitectureforcognitiverobotics-2016","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2018-11-13T16:59:13.959Z","title":"Percepts symbols or Action symbols? Generalizing how all modules interact within a software architecture for cognitive robotics","author_short":["Marfil, R.","Manso, L. J","Bandera, J. P.","Romero-Garcés, A.","Bandera, A.","Bustos, P.","Calderita, L. V.","González, J. C.","García-Olaya, A.","Fuentetaja, R.","Fernández, F."],"year":2016,"bibtype":"inproceedings","biburl":"http://www.plg.inf.uc3m.es/bib/publistplg.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"inproceedings","type":"inproceedings","abstract":"Robots require a close coupling of perception and action. Cognitive robots go beyond this to require a further coupling with cognition. From the perspective of robotics, this coupling generally emphasizes a tightly integrated perceptuomo- tor system, which is then loosely connected to some limited form of cognitive system such as a planner. At the other end, from the perspective of automated planning, the emphasis is on a highly functional system that, taken to its extreme, calls perceptual and motor modules as independent functions. This paper proposes to join both perspectives through a unique representation where the responses of all modules on the software architecture (percepts or actions) are grounded using the same set of symbols. This allows to generalize the signal-to-symbol divide that separates classic perceptuomotor and automated planning systems, being the result a software architecture where all software modules interact using the same tokens.","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Marfil"],"firstnames":["Rebeca"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Manso"],"firstnames":["Luis","J"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bandera"],"firstnames":["Juan","Pedro"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Romero-Garcés"],"firstnames":["Adrian"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bandera"],"firstnames":["Antonio"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bustos"],"firstnames":["Pablo"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Calderita"],"firstnames":["Luis","Vicente"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["González"],"firstnames":["José","Carlos"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["García-Olaya"],"firstnames":["Angel"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Fuentetaja"],"firstnames":["Raquel"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Fernández"],"firstnames":["Fernando"],"suffixes":[]}],"booktitle":"Workshop of Physical Agents 2016","file":":C$\\$:/Users/angel/Documents/Mendeley Desktop/Marfil et al. - 2016 - Percepts symbols or Action symbols Generalizing how all modules interact within a software architecture for cogni.pdf:pdf","number":"June","pages":"9–16","title":"Percepts symbols or Action symbols? Generalizing how all modules interact within a software architecture for cognitive robotics","year":"2016","bibtex":"@inproceedings{Marfil2016,\nabstract = {Robots require a close coupling of perception and action. Cognitive robots go beyond this to require a further coupling with cognition. From the perspective of robotics, this coupling generally emphasizes a tightly integrated perceptuomo- tor system, which is then loosely connected to some limited form of cognitive system such as a planner. At the other end, from the perspective of automated planning, the emphasis is on a highly functional system that, taken to its extreme, calls perceptual and motor modules as independent functions. This paper proposes to join both perspectives through a unique representation where the responses of all modules on the software architecture (percepts or actions) are grounded using the same set of symbols. This allows to generalize the signal-to-symbol divide that separates classic perceptuomotor and automated planning systems, being the result a software architecture where all software modules interact using the same tokens.},\nauthor = {Marfil, Rebeca and Manso, Luis J and Bandera, Juan Pedro and Romero-Garc{\\'{e}}s, Adrian and Bandera, Antonio and Bustos, Pablo and Calderita, Luis Vicente and Gonz{\\'{a}}lez, Jos{\\'{e}} Carlos and Garc{\\'{i}}a-Olaya, Angel and Fuentetaja, Raquel and Fern{\\'{a}}ndez, Fernando},\nbooktitle = {Workshop of Physical Agents 2016},\nfile = {:C$\\backslash$:/Users/angel/Documents/Mendeley Desktop/Marfil et al. - 2016 - Percepts symbols or Action symbols Generalizing how all modules interact within a software architecture for cogni.pdf:pdf},\nnumber = {June},\npages = {9--16},\ntitle = {{Percepts symbols or Action symbols? Generalizing how all modules interact within a software architecture for cognitive robotics}},\nyear = {2016}\n}\n","author_short":["Marfil, R.","Manso, L. J","Bandera, J. P.","Romero-Garcés, A.","Bandera, A.","Bustos, P.","Calderita, L. V.","González, J. C.","García-Olaya, A.","Fuentetaja, R.","Fernández, F."],"key":"Marfil2016","id":"Marfil2016","bibbaseid":"marfil-manso-bandera-romerogarcs-bandera-bustos-calderita-gonzlez-etal-perceptssymbolsoractionsymbolsgeneralizinghowallmodulesinteractwithinasoftwarearchitectureforcognitiverobotics-2016","role":"author","urls":{},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{"fuentetaja, r":"http://www.plg.inf.uc3m.es/"}}},"search_terms":["percepts","symbols","action","symbols","generalizing","modules","interact","within","software","architecture","cognitive","robotics","marfil","manso","bandera","romero-garcés","bandera","bustos","calderita","gonzález","garcía-olaya","fuentetaja","fernández"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":["54576b422abc8e9f370003a7","5e1da089d9acfbde0100007c","5e24a32c1a6264de01000026","5e4f5cdc8a3535f30100012e","5ykNghm9Zoef5CP3J","6jhYJ3WEg7bp97Bbq","Nk9ZoTD5nJGPgnbZb","YDtAaBJhSkBJ2F8p2","fYMqpzdft6qxZYRAu","uFsadmEmoBpWTz9mZ"],"dataSources":["6rjpjXD4NNhQBc3tX","eeebSGk8rTW4cn9yN","FWTkw6nQe3SThxmno"]}