@article{marila_vagueness_2017,
	title = {Vagueness and {Archaeological} {Interpretation}: {A} {Sensuous} {Approach} to {Archaeological} {Knowledge} {Formation} through {Finds} {Analysis}},
	volume = {50},
	issn = {0029-3652},
	shorttitle = {Vagueness and {Archaeological} {Interpretation}},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2017.1325393},
	doi = {10.1080/00293652.2017.1325393},
	abstract = {The rapid development of natural scientific methods coupled with the recent popularity of new materialist philosophies in archaeological theory has raised discussion about the possibility of a return to empiricism in archaeology. While empiricism as a pragmatic philosophy is in line with archaeology’s hands-on character, the recent development has left some concerned about the vanishing role of vagueness and ambiguity in archaeological interpretation. In this setting, the exactitude of natural scientific methods is seen as a process of simplification that compromises the tacit dimensions of archaeological knowledge. This article discusses vagueness as an elementary part of all archaeological knowledge formation, with a particular emphasis on the role of perception and senses in finds analysis. Archaeological finds analysis is explored as an example of epistemologically vague and creative hypothesis formation.},
	number = {1},
	urldate = {2020-10-01},
	journal = {Norwegian Archaeological Review},
	author = {Marila, Marko},
	month = jan,
	year = {2017},
	note = {Publisher: Routledge
\_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2017.1325393},
	pages = {66--88},
}

{"_id":"3vsnLpLAmyZJACDZK","bibbaseid":"marila-vaguenessandarchaeologicalinterpretationasensuousapproachtoarchaeologicalknowledgeformationthroughfindsanalysis-2017","author_short":["Marila, M."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Vagueness and Archaeological Interpretation: A Sensuous Approach to Archaeological Knowledge Formation through Finds Analysis","volume":"50","issn":"0029-3652","shorttitle":"Vagueness and Archaeological Interpretation","url":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2017.1325393","doi":"10.1080/00293652.2017.1325393","abstract":"The rapid development of natural scientific methods coupled with the recent popularity of new materialist philosophies in archaeological theory has raised discussion about the possibility of a return to empiricism in archaeology. While empiricism as a pragmatic philosophy is in line with archaeology’s hands-on character, the recent development has left some concerned about the vanishing role of vagueness and ambiguity in archaeological interpretation. In this setting, the exactitude of natural scientific methods is seen as a process of simplification that compromises the tacit dimensions of archaeological knowledge. This article discusses vagueness as an elementary part of all archaeological knowledge formation, with a particular emphasis on the role of perception and senses in finds analysis. Archaeological finds analysis is explored as an example of epistemologically vague and creative hypothesis formation.","number":"1","urldate":"2020-10-01","journal":"Norwegian Archaeological Review","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Marila"],"firstnames":["Marko"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"January","year":"2017","note":"Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2017.1325393","pages":"66–88","bibtex":"@article{marila_vagueness_2017,\n\ttitle = {Vagueness and {Archaeological} {Interpretation}: {A} {Sensuous} {Approach} to {Archaeological} {Knowledge} {Formation} through {Finds} {Analysis}},\n\tvolume = {50},\n\tissn = {0029-3652},\n\tshorttitle = {Vagueness and {Archaeological} {Interpretation}},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2017.1325393},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/00293652.2017.1325393},\n\tabstract = {The rapid development of natural scientific methods coupled with the recent popularity of new materialist philosophies in archaeological theory has raised discussion about the possibility of a return to empiricism in archaeology. While empiricism as a pragmatic philosophy is in line with archaeology’s hands-on character, the recent development has left some concerned about the vanishing role of vagueness and ambiguity in archaeological interpretation. In this setting, the exactitude of natural scientific methods is seen as a process of simplification that compromises the tacit dimensions of archaeological knowledge. This article discusses vagueness as an elementary part of all archaeological knowledge formation, with a particular emphasis on the role of perception and senses in finds analysis. Archaeological finds analysis is explored as an example of epistemologically vague and creative hypothesis formation.},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2020-10-01},\n\tjournal = {Norwegian Archaeological Review},\n\tauthor = {Marila, Marko},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Routledge\n\\_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2017.1325393},\n\tpages = {66--88},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Marila, M."],"key":"marila_vagueness_2017","id":"marila_vagueness_2017","bibbaseid":"marila-vaguenessandarchaeologicalinterpretationasensuousapproachtoarchaeologicalknowledgeformationthroughfindsanalysis-2017","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2017.1325393"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/science_et_ignorance/1340424","dataSources":["zX4acseCDM6D58AW7"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["vagueness","archaeological","interpretation","sensuous","approach","archaeological","knowledge","formation","through","finds","analysis","marila"],"title":"Vagueness and Archaeological Interpretation: A Sensuous Approach to Archaeological Knowledge Formation through Finds Analysis","year":2017}