@article{markschies_platonische_1995,
	title = {Die {Platonische} {Metapher} vom "{Inneren} {Menschen}": {Eine} {Brücke} {Zwischen} {Antiker} {Philosophie} und {Altchristlicher} {Theologie}},
	volume = {1},
	issn = {1073-0508},
	shorttitle = {Die {Platonische} {Metapher} vom "{Inneren} {Menschen}"},
	url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/30221838},
	abstract = {The idea of an inner man ("the inner man") was widely spread in the ancient world. Hence one is tempted to neglect the aspect of history of terminology here. The term ἔσω ἄνθρωπον, first used by Paul to describe the inner nature of man, is often explained by drawing a line from Plato via Philo to the apostle. But in fact there is no terminological link between Plato and Paul whatsoever: in Plato's picture of the soul the rational part of the soul is described as (του̑ άνθρώπου) ό έντὸς α̌νθρωποϛ. Philo, Plutarch, and the Corpus Hermeticum do not quote these words but use completely different ones. Only erudite Christian authors such as Origen link Philo and Paul together, combining both terminologies. So a clear distinction between ideas and terms describing certain ideas has to be made. Along with processes of direct adoption mere convergence does exist. The ordinary approach taken in the exegesis of 2 Cor. 4,16 conceals true historical dependencies.},
	number = {3},
	urldate = {2017-06-12},
	journal = {International Journal of the Classical Tradition},
	author = {Markschies, Christoph},
	year = {1995},
	pages = {3--18},
}

{"_id":"mfp7tPc6dEfbderTJ","bibbaseid":"markschies-dieplatonischemetaphervominnerenmenscheneinebrckezwischenantikerphilosophieundaltchristlichertheologie-1995","author_short":["Markschies, C."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Die Platonische Metapher vom \"Inneren Menschen\": Eine Brücke Zwischen Antiker Philosophie und Altchristlicher Theologie","volume":"1","issn":"1073-0508","shorttitle":"Die Platonische Metapher vom \"Inneren Menschen\"","url":"http://www.jstor.org/stable/30221838","abstract":"The idea of an inner man (\"the inner man\") was widely spread in the ancient world. Hence one is tempted to neglect the aspect of history of terminology here. The term ἔσω ἄνθρωπον, first used by Paul to describe the inner nature of man, is often explained by drawing a line from Plato via Philo to the apostle. But in fact there is no terminological link between Plato and Paul whatsoever: in Plato's picture of the soul the rational part of the soul is described as (του̑ άνθρώπου) ό έντὸς α̌νθρωποϛ. Philo, Plutarch, and the Corpus Hermeticum do not quote these words but use completely different ones. Only erudite Christian authors such as Origen link Philo and Paul together, combining both terminologies. So a clear distinction between ideas and terms describing certain ideas has to be made. Along with processes of direct adoption mere convergence does exist. The ordinary approach taken in the exegesis of 2 Cor. 4,16 conceals true historical dependencies.","number":"3","urldate":"2017-06-12","journal":"International Journal of the Classical Tradition","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Markschies"],"firstnames":["Christoph"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"1995","pages":"3–18","bibtex":"@article{markschies_platonische_1995,\n\ttitle = {Die {Platonische} {Metapher} vom \"{Inneren} {Menschen}\": {Eine} {Brücke} {Zwischen} {Antiker} {Philosophie} und {Altchristlicher} {Theologie}},\n\tvolume = {1},\n\tissn = {1073-0508},\n\tshorttitle = {Die {Platonische} {Metapher} vom \"{Inneren} {Menschen}\"},\n\turl = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/30221838},\n\tabstract = {The idea of an inner man (\"the inner man\") was widely spread in the ancient world. Hence one is tempted to neglect the aspect of history of terminology here. The term ἔσω ἄνθρωπον, first used by Paul to describe the inner nature of man, is often explained by drawing a line from Plato via Philo to the apostle. But in fact there is no terminological link between Plato and Paul whatsoever: in Plato's picture of the soul the rational part of the soul is described as (του̑ άνθρώπου) ό έντὸς α̌νθρωποϛ. Philo, Plutarch, and the Corpus Hermeticum do not quote these words but use completely different ones. Only erudite Christian authors such as Origen link Philo and Paul together, combining both terminologies. So a clear distinction between ideas and terms describing certain ideas has to be made. Along with processes of direct adoption mere convergence does exist. The ordinary approach taken in the exegesis of 2 Cor. 4,16 conceals true historical dependencies.},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\turldate = {2017-06-12},\n\tjournal = {International Journal of the Classical Tradition},\n\tauthor = {Markschies, Christoph},\n\tyear = {1995},\n\tpages = {3--18},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Markschies, C."],"key":"markschies_platonische_1995-1","id":"markschies_platonische_1995-1","bibbaseid":"markschies-dieplatonischemetaphervominnerenmenscheneinebrckezwischenantikerphilosophieundaltchristlichertheologie-1995","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.jstor.org/stable/30221838"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/mimagree","dataSources":["AXusoRBcQfTAj3g6r"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["die","platonische","metapher","vom","inneren","menschen","eine","cke","zwischen","antiker","philosophie","und","altchristlicher","theologie","markschies"],"title":"Die Platonische Metapher vom \"Inneren Menschen\": Eine Brücke Zwischen Antiker Philosophie und Altchristlicher Theologie","year":1995}