Botanical Decolonization: Rethinking Native Plants. Mastnak, T., Elyachar, J., & Boellstorff, T. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(2):363-380, 4, 2014. doi abstract bibtex In this paper we use an apparently marginal topic—‘native plants’—to address two issues of concern to contemporary politics and political theory: the legacy of settler colonialism, and dilemmas of scholarship and activism in the ‘Anthropocene’. Drawing on the writings of Francis Bacon and based on a case study of California, we argue that planting and displanting humans and plants are elements of the same multispecies colonial endeavor. In contrast to those who equate native plant advocates with antiimmigrant nativism, we see native plant advocacy as part of a broad process of botanical decolonization and a strategic location for ethical action in the Anthropocene.
@article{
title = {Botanical Decolonization: Rethinking Native Plants},
type = {article},
year = {2014},
pages = {363-380},
volume = {32},
month = {4},
day = {1},
id = {534193a6-352a-311c-94d0-4dff584861a9},
created = {2024-08-05T01:09:57.613Z},
file_attached = {false},
profile_id = {222a8927-bfaf-311a-a599-8618b10ce9b9},
group_id = {13fd89de-a5a1-39e8-9a56-55cf0978428e},
last_modified = {2024-08-05T01:09:57.613Z},
read = {false},
starred = {false},
authored = {false},
confirmed = {false},
hidden = {false},
private_publication = {false},
abstract = {<p>In this paper we use an apparently marginal topic—‘native plants’—to address two issues of concern to contemporary politics and political theory: the legacy of settler colonialism, and dilemmas of scholarship and activism in the ‘Anthropocene’. Drawing on the writings of Francis Bacon and based on a case study of California, we argue that planting and displanting humans and plants are elements of the same multispecies colonial endeavor. In contrast to those who equate native plant advocates with antiimmigrant nativism, we see native plant advocacy as part of a broad process of botanical decolonization and a strategic location for ethical action in the Anthropocene.</p>},
bibtype = {article},
author = {Mastnak, Tomaz and Elyachar, Julia and Boellstorff, Tom},
doi = {10.1068/d13006p},
journal = {Environment and Planning D: Society and Space},
number = {2}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"XQ6auovn7swnAJutQ","bibbaseid":"mastnak-elyachar-boellstorff-botanicaldecolonizationrethinkingnativeplants-2014","author_short":["Mastnak, T.","Elyachar, J.","Boellstorff, T."],"bibdata":{"title":"Botanical Decolonization: Rethinking Native Plants","type":"article","year":"2014","pages":"363-380","volume":"32","month":"4","day":"1","id":"534193a6-352a-311c-94d0-4dff584861a9","created":"2024-08-05T01:09:57.613Z","file_attached":false,"profile_id":"222a8927-bfaf-311a-a599-8618b10ce9b9","group_id":"13fd89de-a5a1-39e8-9a56-55cf0978428e","last_modified":"2024-08-05T01:09:57.613Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":false,"confirmed":false,"hidden":false,"private_publication":false,"abstract":"<p>In this paper we use an apparently marginal topic—‘native plants’—to address two issues of concern to contemporary politics and political theory: the legacy of settler colonialism, and dilemmas of scholarship and activism in the ‘Anthropocene’. Drawing on the writings of Francis Bacon and based on a case study of California, we argue that planting and displanting humans and plants are elements of the same multispecies colonial endeavor. In contrast to those who equate native plant advocates with antiimmigrant nativism, we see native plant advocacy as part of a broad process of botanical decolonization and a strategic location for ethical action in the Anthropocene.</p>","bibtype":"article","author":"Mastnak, Tomaz and Elyachar, Julia and Boellstorff, Tom","doi":"10.1068/d13006p","journal":"Environment and Planning D: Society and Space","number":"2","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {Botanical Decolonization: Rethinking Native Plants},\n type = {article},\n year = {2014},\n pages = {363-380},\n volume = {32},\n month = {4},\n day = {1},\n id = {534193a6-352a-311c-94d0-4dff584861a9},\n created = {2024-08-05T01:09:57.613Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {222a8927-bfaf-311a-a599-8618b10ce9b9},\n group_id = {13fd89de-a5a1-39e8-9a56-55cf0978428e},\n last_modified = {2024-08-05T01:09:57.613Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {<p>In this paper we use an apparently marginal topic—‘native plants’—to address two issues of concern to contemporary politics and political theory: the legacy of settler colonialism, and dilemmas of scholarship and activism in the ‘Anthropocene’. Drawing on the writings of Francis Bacon and based on a case study of California, we argue that planting and displanting humans and plants are elements of the same multispecies colonial endeavor. In contrast to those who equate native plant advocates with antiimmigrant nativism, we see native plant advocacy as part of a broad process of botanical decolonization and a strategic location for ethical action in the Anthropocene.</p>},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Mastnak, Tomaz and Elyachar, Julia and Boellstorff, Tom},\n doi = {10.1068/d13006p},\n journal = {Environment and Planning D: Society and Space},\n number = {2}\n}","author_short":["Mastnak, T.","Elyachar, J.","Boellstorff, T."],"biburl":"https://bibbase.org/service/mendeley/222a8927-bfaf-311a-a599-8618b10ce9b9","bibbaseid":"mastnak-elyachar-boellstorff-botanicaldecolonizationrethinkingnativeplants-2014","role":"author","urls":{},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/service/mendeley/222a8927-bfaf-311a-a599-8618b10ce9b9","dataSources":["8Pc8cchSHZJmfjzMA","2252seNhipfTmjEBQ"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["botanical","decolonization","rethinking","native","plants","mastnak","elyachar","boellstorff"],"title":"Botanical Decolonization: Rethinking Native Plants","year":2014}