@article{francesca_aran_murphy_kenoticism_nodate,
	title = {Kenoticism in {Modern} {Christology}},
	issn = {9780199641901},
	url = {//www.oxfordhandbooks.com/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641901.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199641901-e-26},
	doi = {10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641901.013.26},
	abstract = {When Phil. 2:6 says, ‘he emptied himself’ is ‘he’ the Incarnate Christ or it ‘he’ God pure and simple? One version of Kenoticism says the man Jesus Christ emptied himself; another version says God emptied himself to become the man Jesus Christ. Chemnitz claimed that Jesus’ human nature ‘has’ some divine attributes like majesty non-essentially. Modern Kenoticism was sparked by life of Jesus research, and by Strauss’ claim that one self-consciousness cannot have two different ‘personalities’. For Thomasius kenosis is divestment of divinity by the Word: Christ must be non-omniscient to be fully human. For Gess, Incarnation is the Word’s becoming a human soul. Scottish Kenoticists claimed the Word ‘retracted’ his divine attributes during the Incarnation. We need a kenotic theory which makes kenosisoriginal to the being of God so that its temporal concretization involves no change in God and understands kenosis to subtract nothing proper from God.},
	language = {English},
	author = {McCormack, Bruce},
	editor = {{Francesca Aran Murphy}},
}

{"_id":"egwSpHPmJNxCxZj6Y","bibbaseid":"mccormack-kenoticisminmodernchristology","author_short":["McCormack, B."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Kenoticism in Modern Christology","issn":"9780199641901","url":"//www.oxfordhandbooks.com/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641901.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199641901-e-26","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641901.013.26","abstract":"When Phil. 2:6 says, ‘he emptied himself’ is ‘he’ the Incarnate Christ or it ‘he’ God pure and simple? One version of Kenoticism says the man Jesus Christ emptied himself; another version says God emptied himself to become the man Jesus Christ. Chemnitz claimed that Jesus’ human nature ‘has’ some divine attributes like majesty non-essentially. Modern Kenoticism was sparked by life of Jesus research, and by Strauss’ claim that one self-consciousness cannot have two different ‘personalities’. For Thomasius kenosis is divestment of divinity by the Word: Christ must be non-omniscient to be fully human. For Gess, Incarnation is the Word’s becoming a human soul. Scottish Kenoticists claimed the Word ‘retracted’ his divine attributes during the Incarnation. We need a kenotic theory which makes kenosisoriginal to the being of God so that its temporal concretization involves no change in God and understands kenosis to subtract nothing proper from God.","language":"English","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["McCormack"],"firstnames":["Bruce"],"suffixes":[]}],"editor":[{"firstnames":[],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Francesca Aran Murphy"],"suffixes":[]}],"bibtex":"@article{francesca_aran_murphy_kenoticism_nodate,\n\ttitle = {Kenoticism in {Modern} {Christology}},\n\tissn = {9780199641901},\n\turl = {//www.oxfordhandbooks.com/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641901.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199641901-e-26},\n\tdoi = {10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641901.013.26},\n\tabstract = {When Phil. 2:6 says, ‘he emptied himself’ is ‘he’ the Incarnate Christ or it ‘he’ God pure and simple? One version of Kenoticism says the man Jesus Christ emptied himself; another version says God emptied himself to become the man Jesus Christ. Chemnitz claimed that Jesus’ human nature ‘has’ some divine attributes like majesty non-essentially. Modern Kenoticism was sparked by life of Jesus research, and by Strauss’ claim that one self-consciousness cannot have two different ‘personalities’. For Thomasius kenosis is divestment of divinity by the Word: Christ must be non-omniscient to be fully human. For Gess, Incarnation is the Word’s becoming a human soul. Scottish Kenoticists claimed the Word ‘retracted’ his divine attributes during the Incarnation. We need a kenotic theory which makes kenosisoriginal to the being of God so that its temporal concretization involves no change in God and understands kenosis to subtract nothing proper from God.},\n\tlanguage = {English},\n\tauthor = {McCormack, Bruce},\n\teditor = {{Francesca Aran Murphy}},\n}\n\n","author_short":["McCormack, B."],"editor_short":["Francesca Aran Murphy"],"key":"francesca_aran_murphy_kenoticism_nodate","id":"francesca_aran_murphy_kenoticism_nodate","bibbaseid":"mccormack-kenoticisminmodernchristology","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641901.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199641901-e-26"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/mimagree","dataSources":["AXusoRBcQfTAj3g6r"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["kenoticism","modern","christology","mccormack"],"title":"Kenoticism in Modern Christology","year":null}