@article{
 title = {Environmental and vegetation controls on the spatial variability of CH<inf>4</inf> emission from wet-sedge and tussock tundra ecosystems in the Arctic},
 type = {article},
 year = {2015},
 identifiers = {[object Object]},
 keywords = {Arctic,Climate change,Greenhouse gas emission,Permafrost,Vegetation control},
 volume = {388},
 id = {8858f1e6-4a0a-3fc3-a88a-538bbd663414},
 created = {2018-04-05T23:20:52.441Z},
 file_attached = {false},
 profile_id = {93cc1067-253c-3a94-87b0-452b9c9fc1b9},
 last_modified = {2018-04-05T23:20:52.441Z},
 read = {false},
 starred = {false},
 authored = {true},
 confirmed = {false},
 hidden = {false},
 private_publication = {false},
 abstract = {© 2015, The Author(s). Aims: Despite multiple studies investigating the environmental controls on CH 4  fluxes from arctic tundra ecosystems, the high spatial variability of CH 4  emissions is not fully understood. This makes the upscaling of CH 4  fluxes from plot to regional scale, particularly challenging. The goal of this study is to refine our knowledge of the spatial variability and controls on CH 4  emission from tundra ecosystems. Methods: CH 4  fluxes were measured in four sites across a variety of wet-sedge and tussock tundra ecosystems in Alaska using chambers and a Los Gatos CO 2  and CH 4  gas analyser. Results: All sites were found to be sources of CH 4 , with northern sites (in Barrow) showing similar CH 4  emission rates to the southernmost site (ca. 300 km south, Ivotuk). Gross primary productivity (GPP), water level and soil temperature were the most important environmental controls on CH 4  emission. Greater vascular plant cover was linked with higher CH 4  emission, but this increased emission with increased vascular plant cover was much higher (86 %) in the drier sites, than the wettest sites (30 %), suggesting that transport and/or substrate availability were crucial limiting factors for CH 4  emission in these tundra ecosystems. Conclusions: Overall, this study provides an increased understanding of the fine scale spatial controls on CH 4  flux, in particular the key role that plant cover and GPP play in enhancing CH 4  emissions from tundra soils.},
 bibtype = {article},
 author = {McEwing, K.R. and Fisher, J.P. and Zona, D.},
 journal = {Plant and Soil},
 number = {1-2}
}

{"_id":"ghJEABumkZAbeNmcb","bibbaseid":"mcewing-fisher-zona-environmentalandvegetationcontrolsonthespatialvariabilityofchinf4infemissionfromwetsedgeandtussocktundraecosystemsinthearctic-2015","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2018-04-06T15:27:57.629Z","title":"Environmental and vegetation controls on the spatial variability of CH<inf>4</inf> emission from wet-sedge and tussock tundra ecosystems in the Arctic","author_short":["McEwing, K.","Fisher, J.","Zona, D."],"year":2015,"bibtype":"article","biburl":null,"bibdata":{"title":"Environmental and vegetation controls on the spatial variability of CH<inf>4</inf> emission from wet-sedge and tussock tundra ecosystems in the Arctic","type":"article","year":"2015","identifiers":"[object Object]","keywords":"Arctic,Climate change,Greenhouse gas emission,Permafrost,Vegetation control","volume":"388","id":"8858f1e6-4a0a-3fc3-a88a-538bbd663414","created":"2018-04-05T23:20:52.441Z","file_attached":false,"profile_id":"93cc1067-253c-3a94-87b0-452b9c9fc1b9","last_modified":"2018-04-05T23:20:52.441Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":"true","confirmed":false,"hidden":false,"private_publication":false,"abstract":"© 2015, The Author(s). Aims: Despite multiple studies investigating the environmental controls on CH 4 fluxes from arctic tundra ecosystems, the high spatial variability of CH 4 emissions is not fully understood. This makes the upscaling of CH 4 fluxes from plot to regional scale, particularly challenging. The goal of this study is to refine our knowledge of the spatial variability and controls on CH 4 emission from tundra ecosystems. Methods: CH 4 fluxes were measured in four sites across a variety of wet-sedge and tussock tundra ecosystems in Alaska using chambers and a Los Gatos CO 2 and CH 4 gas analyser. Results: All sites were found to be sources of CH 4 , with northern sites (in Barrow) showing similar CH 4 emission rates to the southernmost site (ca. 300 km south, Ivotuk). Gross primary productivity (GPP), water level and soil temperature were the most important environmental controls on CH 4 emission. Greater vascular plant cover was linked with higher CH 4 emission, but this increased emission with increased vascular plant cover was much higher (86 %) in the drier sites, than the wettest sites (30 %), suggesting that transport and/or substrate availability were crucial limiting factors for CH 4 emission in these tundra ecosystems. Conclusions: Overall, this study provides an increased understanding of the fine scale spatial controls on CH 4 flux, in particular the key role that plant cover and GPP play in enhancing CH 4 emissions from tundra soils.","bibtype":"article","author":"McEwing, K.R. and Fisher, J.P. and Zona, D.","journal":"Plant and Soil","number":"1-2","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {Environmental and vegetation controls on the spatial variability of CH<inf>4</inf> emission from wet-sedge and tussock tundra ecosystems in the Arctic},\n type = {article},\n year = {2015},\n identifiers = {[object Object]},\n keywords = {Arctic,Climate change,Greenhouse gas emission,Permafrost,Vegetation control},\n volume = {388},\n id = {8858f1e6-4a0a-3fc3-a88a-538bbd663414},\n created = {2018-04-05T23:20:52.441Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {93cc1067-253c-3a94-87b0-452b9c9fc1b9},\n last_modified = {2018-04-05T23:20:52.441Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {true},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {© 2015, The Author(s). Aims: Despite multiple studies investigating the environmental controls on CH 4 fluxes from arctic tundra ecosystems, the high spatial variability of CH 4 emissions is not fully understood. This makes the upscaling of CH 4 fluxes from plot to regional scale, particularly challenging. The goal of this study is to refine our knowledge of the spatial variability and controls on CH 4 emission from tundra ecosystems. Methods: CH 4 fluxes were measured in four sites across a variety of wet-sedge and tussock tundra ecosystems in Alaska using chambers and a Los Gatos CO 2 and CH 4 gas analyser. Results: All sites were found to be sources of CH 4 , with northern sites (in Barrow) showing similar CH 4 emission rates to the southernmost site (ca. 300 km south, Ivotuk). Gross primary productivity (GPP), water level and soil temperature were the most important environmental controls on CH 4 emission. Greater vascular plant cover was linked with higher CH 4 emission, but this increased emission with increased vascular plant cover was much higher (86 %) in the drier sites, than the wettest sites (30 %), suggesting that transport and/or substrate availability were crucial limiting factors for CH 4 emission in these tundra ecosystems. Conclusions: Overall, this study provides an increased understanding of the fine scale spatial controls on CH 4 flux, in particular the key role that plant cover and GPP play in enhancing CH 4 emissions from tundra soils.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {McEwing, K.R. and Fisher, J.P. and Zona, D.},\n journal = {Plant and Soil},\n number = {1-2}\n}","author_short":["McEwing, K.","Fisher, J.","Zona, D."],"bibbaseid":"mcewing-fisher-zona-environmentalandvegetationcontrolsonthespatialvariabilityofchinf4infemissionfromwetsedgeandtussocktundraecosystemsinthearctic-2015","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Arctic","Climate change","Greenhouse gas emission","Permafrost","Vegetation control"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["environmental","vegetation","controls","spatial","variability","inf","inf","emission","wet","sedge","tussock","tundra","ecosystems","arctic","mcewing","fisher","zona"],"keywords":["arctic","climate change","greenhouse gas emission","permafrost","vegetation control"],"authorIDs":["5ac791fdc392d21000000114"]}