Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references. McKeown, S. & Mir, Z. M. Systematic Reviews, 10(1):38, January, 2021.
Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
Systematic reviews involve searching multiple bibliographic databases to identify eligible studies. As this type of evidence synthesis is increasingly pursued, the use of various electronic platforms can help researchers improve the efficiency and quality of their research. We examined the accuracy and efficiency of commonly used electronic methods for flagging and removing duplicate references during this process.
@article{mckeown_considerations_2021,
	title = {Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references},
	volume = {10},
	issn = {2046-4053},
	shorttitle = {Considerations for conducting systematic reviews},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01583-y},
	doi = {10.1186/s13643-021-01583-y},
	abstract = {Systematic reviews involve searching multiple bibliographic databases to identify eligible studies. As this type of evidence synthesis is increasingly pursued, the use of various electronic platforms can help researchers improve the efficiency and quality of their research. We examined the accuracy and efficiency of commonly used electronic methods for flagging and removing duplicate references during this process.},
	language = {en},
	number = {1},
	urldate = {2022-03-26},
	journal = {Systematic Reviews},
	author = {McKeown, Sandra and Mir, Zuhaib M.},
	month = jan,
	year = {2021},
	keywords = {zfrancophone\_RevLit},
	pages = {38},
}

Downloads: 0