@inproceedings{MendozaKSF19,
  author    = {Isela Mendoza and
               Marcos Kalinowski and
               Uéverton Souza and
               Michael Felderer},   
  title     = {Relating Verification and Validation Methods to Software Product Quality Characteristics: Results of an Expert Survey},
  abstract  = {[Context] Employing appropriate verification and validation (V&V) methods is essential to improve software product quality. However, while several V&V methods have been documented, little is known about how these methods relate to specific product quality characteristics. [Goal] The goal of this paper is to provide an initial understanding on the suitability of selected V&V methods to address ISO 25010 software product quality characteristics. [Method] Therefore, we compiled a list of V&V methods and conducted a survey with V&V experts, asking them to evaluate how well each V&V method allows addressing the ISO 25010 characteristics. [Results] We received 19 answers from experts of 7 different countries. Our results express the aggregated expert opinion. It is noteworthy that the experts mostly agreed in their opinions, indicating consistency in the results. [Conclusions] To the best of our knowledge this is the first result on the relationship between V&V methods and quality characteristics. We believe that the aggregated opinion of 19 experts can serve as a starting point for further investigations by other researchers and to provide an initial understanding to practitioners.},
  booktitle = {Software Quality Days,
               11th International Conference, {SWQD} 2019, Vienna, Austria, January 15-18},
  pages     = {33-44},
  year      = {2019},
  urlAuthor_version       = {http://www.inf.puc-rio.br/~kalinowski/publications/MendozaKSF19.pdf},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-030-05767-1_3},
}

{"_id":"FmZTBii9bjRqgfqdd","bibbaseid":"mendoza-kalinowski-souza-felderer-relatingverificationandvalidationmethodstosoftwareproductqualitycharacteristicsresultsofanexpertsurvey-2019","downloads":7,"creationDate":"2018-08-16T22:48:59.797Z","title":"Relating Verification and Validation Methods to Software Product Quality Characteristics: Results of an Expert Survey","author_short":["Mendoza, I.","Kalinowski, M.","Souza, U.","Felderer, M."],"year":2019,"bibtype":"inproceedings","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/f/2Gq6bNPQ845THHiMW/KalinowskiPapers.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"inproceedings","type":"inproceedings","author":[{"firstnames":["Isela"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Mendoza"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Marcos"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kalinowski"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Uéverton"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Souza"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Michael"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Felderer"],"suffixes":[]}],"title":"Relating Verification and Validation Methods to Software Product Quality Characteristics: Results of an Expert Survey","abstract":"[Context] Employing appropriate verification and validation (V&V) methods is essential to improve software product quality. However, while several V&V methods have been documented, little is known about how these methods relate to specific product quality characteristics. [Goal] The goal of this paper is to provide an initial understanding on the suitability of selected V&V methods to address ISO 25010 software product quality characteristics. [Method] Therefore, we compiled a list of V&V methods and conducted a survey with V&V experts, asking them to evaluate how well each V&V method allows addressing the ISO 25010 characteristics. [Results] We received 19 answers from experts of 7 different countries. Our results express the aggregated expert opinion. It is noteworthy that the experts mostly agreed in their opinions, indicating consistency in the results. [Conclusions] To the best of our knowledge this is the first result on the relationship between V&V methods and quality characteristics. We believe that the aggregated opinion of 19 experts can serve as a starting point for further investigations by other researchers and to provide an initial understanding to practitioners.","booktitle":"Software Quality Days, 11th International Conference, SWQD 2019, Vienna, Austria, January 15-18","pages":"33-44","year":"2019","urlauthor_version":"http://www.inf.puc-rio.br/~kalinowski/publications/MendozaKSF19.pdf","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-05767-1_3","bibtex":"@inproceedings{MendozaKSF19,\r\n author = {Isela Mendoza and\r\n Marcos Kalinowski and\r\n Uéverton Souza and\r\n Michael Felderer}, \r\n title = {Relating Verification and Validation Methods to Software Product Quality Characteristics: Results of an Expert Survey},\r\n abstract = {[Context] Employing appropriate verification and validation (V&V) methods is essential to improve software product quality. However, while several V&V methods have been documented, little is known about how these methods relate to specific product quality characteristics. [Goal] The goal of this paper is to provide an initial understanding on the suitability of selected V&V methods to address ISO 25010 software product quality characteristics. [Method] Therefore, we compiled a list of V&V methods and conducted a survey with V&V experts, asking them to evaluate how well each V&V method allows addressing the ISO 25010 characteristics. [Results] We received 19 answers from experts of 7 different countries. Our results express the aggregated expert opinion. It is noteworthy that the experts mostly agreed in their opinions, indicating consistency in the results. [Conclusions] To the best of our knowledge this is the first result on the relationship between V&V methods and quality characteristics. We believe that the aggregated opinion of 19 experts can serve as a starting point for further investigations by other researchers and to provide an initial understanding to practitioners.},\r\n booktitle = {Software Quality Days,\r\n 11th International Conference, {SWQD} 2019, Vienna, Austria, January 15-18},\r\n pages = {33-44},\r\n year = {2019},\r\n urlAuthor_version = {http://www.inf.puc-rio.br/~kalinowski/publications/MendozaKSF19.pdf},\r\n doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-05767-1_3},\r\n}\r\n\r\n","author_short":["Mendoza, I.","Kalinowski, M.","Souza, U.","Felderer, M."],"key":"MendozaKSF19","id":"MendozaKSF19","bibbaseid":"mendoza-kalinowski-souza-felderer-relatingverificationandvalidationmethodstosoftwareproductqualitycharacteristicsresultsofanexpertsurvey-2019","role":"author","urls":{"Author version":"http://www.inf.puc-rio.br/~kalinowski/publications/MendozaKSF19.pdf"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{"kalinowski, m":"https://www-di.inf.puc-rio.br/~kalinowski/publications.html"}},"downloads":7,"html":""},"search_terms":["relating","verification","validation","methods","software","product","quality","characteristics","results","expert","survey","mendoza","kalinowski","souza","felderer"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":["2QsG9mfJnwX6MTuoJ"],"dataSources":["JhEx5LqjNuowkDTYw","vp6ff9ZJkhXGDuh9E","fNxekpJ4iGWMdJryo","FPdHx2YNMWt6KHbaS","oL8GbjE74fizfjkxY","Wbj3iHa4hGsGjEGJE","q7rgFjFgwoTSGkm3G","aKfxcyv7C9p9ytdpG","9pAzChfPy53GguqQk","B8Jierr7smZsGa7Jb","tvqztEQv84agmtPEB","ZCce9uhx7vt9PXPrc","FGDKYBjH9upApdKoL"]}