@article{mentink-vigier_erratum_2021,
	title = {Erratum: {De} novoprediction of cross-effect efficiency for magic angle spinning dynamic nuclear polarization ({Physical} {Chemistry} {Chemical} {Physics} (2019) 21 (2166–2176) {DOI}: 10.1039/{C8CP06819D})},
	volume = {23},
	doi = {10.1039/d1cp90117f},
	abstract = {The authors wish to correct the sign of the J-exchange interaction in Table 1 in order to match the convention defined in the Supporting Information. The J-exchange interaction values are all negative under the convention (Formula Presented) The corrected version of Table 1 is shown below. (Table Presented) A sentence in the conclusion should also be modified to: ‘‘it clearly confirms the presence of an exchange interaction of B {\textasciitilde} - 15 MHz and a dipolar coupling of B35 MHz for AMUPol, as initially reported,23,30 although it was a matter of debate78 until recently.68’’ In addition, Fig. 4 was incorrect: the grey overlay representing the error was shifted. The corrected figure is shown below. (Figure Presented). The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.},
	number = {24},
	journal = {Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics},
	author = {Mentink-Vigier, F. and Barra, A.-L. and van Tol, J. and Hediger, S. and Lee, D. and De Paëpe, G.},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {13768--13769},
}

{"_id":"KXQaby5Re8PzFwq4R","bibbaseid":"mentinkvigier-barra-vantol-hediger-lee-depape-erratumdenovopredictionofcrosseffectefficiencyformagicanglespinningdynamicnuclearpolarizationphysicalchemistrychemicalphysics20192121662176doi101039c8cp06819d-2021","author_short":["Mentink-Vigier, F.","Barra, A.","van Tol, J.","Hediger, S.","Lee, D.","De Paëpe, G."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Erratum: De novoprediction of cross-effect efficiency for magic angle spinning dynamic nuclear polarization (Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (2019) 21 (2166–2176) DOI: 10.1039/C8CP06819D)","volume":"23","doi":"10.1039/d1cp90117f","abstract":"The authors wish to correct the sign of the J-exchange interaction in Table 1 in order to match the convention defined in the Supporting Information. The J-exchange interaction values are all negative under the convention (Formula Presented) The corrected version of Table 1 is shown below. (Table Presented) A sentence in the conclusion should also be modified to: ‘‘it clearly confirms the presence of an exchange interaction of B ~ - 15 MHz and a dipolar coupling of B35 MHz for AMUPol, as initially reported,23,30 although it was a matter of debate78 until recently.68’’ In addition, Fig. 4 was incorrect: the grey overlay representing the error was shifted. The corrected figure is shown below. (Figure Presented). The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.","number":"24","journal":"Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Mentink-Vigier"],"firstnames":["F."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Barra"],"firstnames":["A.-L."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":["van"],"lastnames":["Tol"],"firstnames":["J."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hediger"],"firstnames":["S."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lee"],"firstnames":["D."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["De","Paëpe"],"firstnames":["G."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2021","pages":"13768–13769","bibtex":"@article{mentink-vigier_erratum_2021,\n\ttitle = {Erratum: {De} novoprediction of cross-effect efficiency for magic angle spinning dynamic nuclear polarization ({Physical} {Chemistry} {Chemical} {Physics} (2019) 21 (2166–2176) {DOI}: 10.1039/{C8CP06819D})},\n\tvolume = {23},\n\tdoi = {10.1039/d1cp90117f},\n\tabstract = {The authors wish to correct the sign of the J-exchange interaction in Table 1 in order to match the convention defined in the Supporting Information. The J-exchange interaction values are all negative under the convention (Formula Presented) The corrected version of Table 1 is shown below. (Table Presented) A sentence in the conclusion should also be modified to: ‘‘it clearly confirms the presence of an exchange interaction of B {\\textasciitilde} - 15 MHz and a dipolar coupling of B35 MHz for AMUPol, as initially reported,23,30 although it was a matter of debate78 until recently.68’’ In addition, Fig. 4 was incorrect: the grey overlay representing the error was shifted. The corrected figure is shown below. (Figure Presented). The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.},\n\tnumber = {24},\n\tjournal = {Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics},\n\tauthor = {Mentink-Vigier, F. and Barra, A.-L. and van Tol, J. and Hediger, S. and Lee, D. and De Paëpe, G.},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tpages = {13768--13769},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Mentink-Vigier, F.","Barra, A.","van Tol, J.","Hediger, S.","Lee, D.","De Paëpe, G."],"key":"mentink-vigier_erratum_2021","id":"mentink-vigier_erratum_2021","bibbaseid":"mentinkvigier-barra-vantol-hediger-lee-depape-erratumdenovopredictionofcrosseffectefficiencyformagicanglespinningdynamicnuclearpolarizationphysicalchemistrychemicalphysics20192121662176doi101039c8cp06819d-2021","role":"author","urls":{},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/subhradip.paul","dataSources":["epdxi2MtNPwoQCL4d"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["erratum","novoprediction","cross","effect","efficiency","magic","angle","spinning","dynamic","nuclear","polarization","physical","chemistry","chemical","physics","2019","2166","2176","doi","1039","c8cp06819d","mentink-vigier","barra","van tol","hediger","lee","de paëpe"],"title":"Erratum: De novoprediction of cross-effect efficiency for magic angle spinning dynamic nuclear polarization (Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (2019) 21 (2166–2176) DOI: 10.1039/C8CP06819D)","year":2021}