Assessment of regularization techniques for electrocardiographic imaging. Milanic, M., Jazbinsek, V., Macleod, R., Brooks, D., & Hren, R. j-JE, 47(1):20–28, Jan-Feb, 2014. bibtex @Article{RSM:Mil2014,
author = "M. Milanic and V. Jazbinsek and R.S. Macleod and D.H.
Brooks and R. Hren",
title = "Assessment of regularization techniques for
electrocardiographic imaging.",
journal = j-JE,
year = "2014",
month = "Jan-Feb",
volume = "47",
number = "1",
pages = "20--28",
robnote = "A widely used approach to solving the inverse problem in
electrocardiography involves computing potentials on the
epicardium from measured electrocardiograms (ECGs) on the
torso surface. The main challenge of solving this
electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) problem lies in its
intrinsic ill-posedness. While many regularization
techniques have been developed to control wild
oscillations of the solution, the choice of proper
regularization methods for obtaining clinically acceptable
solutions is still a subject of ongoing research. However
there has been little rigorous comparison across methods
proposed by different groups. This study systematically
compared various regularization techniques for solving the
ECGI problem under a unified simulation framework,
consisting of both 1) progressively more complex idealized
source models (from single dipole to triplet of dipoles),
and 2) an electrolytic human torso tank containing a live
canine heart, with the cardiac source being modeled by
potentials measured on a cylindrical cage placed around
the heart. We tested 13 different regularization
techniques to solve the inverse problem of recovering
epicardial potentials, and found that non-quadratic
methods (total variation algorithms) and first-order and
second-order Tikhonov regularizations outperformed other
methodologies and resulted in similar average
reconstruction errors.",
bibdate = "Sun Sep 21 21:53:35 2014",
pmcid = "PMC4154607",
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"vZL3BwkgSCxhdWxf9","bibbaseid":"milanic-jazbinsek-macleod-brooks-hren-assessmentofregularizationtechniquesforelectrocardiographicimaging-2014","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-07-01T21:38:37.627Z","title":"Assessment of regularization techniques for electrocardiographic imaging.","author_short":["Milanic, M.","Jazbinsek, V.","Macleod, R.","Brooks, D.","Hren, R."],"year":2014,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://www.sci.utah.edu/~macleod/Bibtex/biglit.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","author":[{"firstnames":["M."],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Milanic"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["V."],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Jazbinsek"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["R.S."],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Macleod"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["D.H."],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Brooks"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["R."],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hren"],"suffixes":[]}],"title":"Assessment of regularization techniques for electrocardiographic imaging.","journal":"j-JE","year":"2014","month":"Jan-Feb","volume":"47","number":"1","pages":"20–28","robnote":"A widely used approach to solving the inverse problem in electrocardiography involves computing potentials on the epicardium from measured electrocardiograms (ECGs) on the torso surface. The main challenge of solving this electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) problem lies in its intrinsic ill-posedness. While many regularization techniques have been developed to control wild oscillations of the solution, the choice of proper regularization methods for obtaining clinically acceptable solutions is still a subject of ongoing research. However there has been little rigorous comparison across methods proposed by different groups. This study systematically compared various regularization techniques for solving the ECGI problem under a unified simulation framework, consisting of both 1) progressively more complex idealized source models (from single dipole to triplet of dipoles), and 2) an electrolytic human torso tank containing a live canine heart, with the cardiac source being modeled by potentials measured on a cylindrical cage placed around the heart. We tested 13 different regularization techniques to solve the inverse problem of recovering epicardial potentials, and found that non-quadratic methods (total variation algorithms) and first-order and second-order Tikhonov regularizations outperformed other methodologies and resulted in similar average reconstruction errors.","bibdate":"Sun Sep 21 21:53:35 2014","pmcid":"PMC4154607","bibtex":"@Article{RSM:Mil2014,\n author = \"M. Milanic and V. Jazbinsek and R.S. Macleod and D.H.\n Brooks and R. Hren\",\n title = \"Assessment of regularization techniques for\n electrocardiographic imaging.\",\n journal = j-JE,\n year = \"2014\",\n month = \"Jan-Feb\",\n volume = \"47\",\n number = \"1\",\n pages = \"20--28\",\n robnote = \"A widely used approach to solving the inverse problem in\n electrocardiography involves computing potentials on the\n epicardium from measured electrocardiograms (ECGs) on the\n torso surface. The main challenge of solving this\n electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) problem lies in its\n intrinsic ill-posedness. While many regularization\n techniques have been developed to control wild\n oscillations of the solution, the choice of proper\n regularization methods for obtaining clinically acceptable\n solutions is still a subject of ongoing research. However\n there has been little rigorous comparison across methods\n proposed by different groups. This study systematically\n compared various regularization techniques for solving the\n ECGI problem under a unified simulation framework,\n consisting of both 1) progressively more complex idealized\n source models (from single dipole to triplet of dipoles),\n and 2) an electrolytic human torso tank containing a live\n canine heart, with the cardiac source being modeled by\n potentials measured on a cylindrical cage placed around\n the heart. We tested 13 different regularization\n techniques to solve the inverse problem of recovering\n epicardial potentials, and found that non-quadratic\n methods (total variation algorithms) and first-order and\n second-order Tikhonov regularizations outperformed other\n methodologies and resulted in similar average\n reconstruction errors.\",\n bibdate = \"Sun Sep 21 21:53:35 2014\",\n pmcid = \"PMC4154607\",\n}\n\n","author_short":["Milanic, M.","Jazbinsek, V.","Macleod, R.","Brooks, D.","Hren, R."],"key":"RSM:Mil2014","id":"RSM:Mil2014","bibbaseid":"milanic-jazbinsek-macleod-brooks-hren-assessmentofregularizationtechniquesforelectrocardiographicimaging-2014","role":"author","urls":{},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0,"html":""},"search_terms":["assessment","regularization","techniques","electrocardiographic","imaging","milanic","jazbinsek","macleod","brooks","hren"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["5HG3Kp8zRwDd7FotB"]}