Why and when citizens call for emergency help: an observational study of 211,193 medical emergency calls. Møller, T. P., Ersbøll, A. K., Tolstrup, J. S., Østergaard, D., Viereck, S., Overton, J., Folke, F., & Lippert, F. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, November, 2015. ![Why and when citizens call for emergency help: an observational study of 211,193 medical emergency calls [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex Background A medical emergency call is citizens’ access to pre-hospital emergency care and ambulance services. Emergency medical dispatchers are gatekeepers to provision of pre-hospital resources and possibly hospital admissions. We explored causes for access, emergency priority levels, and temporal variation within seasons, weekdays, and time of day for emergency calls to the emergency medical dispatch center in Copenhagen in a two-year study period (December 1st, 2011 to November 30th, 2013). Methods Descriptive analysis was performed for causes for access and emergency priority levels. A Poisson regression model was used to calculate adjusted ratio estimates for the association between seasons, weekdays, and time of day overall and stratified by emergency priority levels. Results We analyzed 211,193 emergency calls for temporal variation. Of those, 167,635 calls were eligible for analysis of causes and emergency priority level. “Unclear problem” was the most frequent category (19 %). The five most common causes with known origin were categorized as “Wounds, fractures, minor injuries” (13 %), “Chest pain/heart disease” (11 %), “Accidents” (9 %), “Intoxication, poisoning, drug overdose” (8 %), and “Breathing difficulties” (7 %). The highest emergency priority levels (Emergency priority level A and B) were assigned in 81 % of calls. In the analysis of temporal variation, the total number of calls peaked at wintertime (26 %), Saturdays (16 %), and during daytime (39 %). Conclusion The pattern of citizens’ contact causes fell into four overall categories: unclear problems, medical problems, intoxication and accidents. The majority of calls were urgent. The magnitude of unclear problems represents a modifiable factor and highlights the potential for further improvement of supportive dispatch priority tools or educational interventions at dispatch centers. Temporal variation was identified within seasons, weekdays and time of day and reflects both system load and disease occurrence. Data on contact patterns could be utilized in a public health perspective, benchmarking of EMS systems, and ultimately development of best practice in the area of emergency medicine. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-015-0169-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
@article{moller_why_2015,
title = {Why and when citizens call for emergency help: an observational study of 211,193 medical emergency calls},
volume = {23},
issn = {1757-7241},
shorttitle = {Why and when citizens call for emergency help},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4632270/},
doi = {10.1186/s13049-015-0169-0},
abstract = {Background
A medical emergency call is citizens’ access to pre-hospital emergency care and ambulance services. Emergency medical dispatchers are gatekeepers to provision of pre-hospital resources and possibly hospital admissions. We explored causes for access, emergency priority levels, and temporal variation within seasons, weekdays, and time of day for emergency calls to the emergency medical dispatch center in Copenhagen in a two-year study period (December 1st, 2011 to November 30th, 2013).
Methods
Descriptive analysis was performed for causes for access and emergency priority levels. A Poisson regression model was used to calculate adjusted ratio estimates for the association between seasons, weekdays, and time of day overall and stratified by emergency priority levels.
Results
We analyzed 211,193 emergency calls for temporal variation. Of those, 167,635 calls were eligible for analysis of causes and emergency priority level. “Unclear problem” was the most frequent category (19 \%). The five most common causes with known origin were categorized as “Wounds, fractures, minor injuries” (13 \%), “Chest pain/heart disease” (11 \%), “Accidents” (9 \%), “Intoxication, poisoning, drug overdose” (8 \%), and “Breathing difficulties” (7 \%). The highest emergency priority levels (Emergency priority level A and B) were assigned in 81 \% of calls. In the analysis of temporal variation, the total number of calls peaked at wintertime (26 \%), Saturdays (16 \%), and during daytime (39 \%).
Conclusion
The pattern of citizens’ contact causes fell into four overall categories: unclear problems, medical problems, intoxication and accidents. The majority of calls were urgent. The magnitude of unclear problems represents a modifiable factor and highlights the potential for further improvement of supportive dispatch priority tools or educational interventions at dispatch centers. Temporal variation was identified within seasons, weekdays and time of day and reflects both system load and disease occurrence. Data on contact patterns could be utilized in a public health perspective, benchmarking of EMS systems, and ultimately development of best practice in the area of emergency medicine.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-015-0169-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.},
journal = {Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine},
author = {Møller, Thea Palsgaard and Ersbøll, Annette Kjær and Tolstrup, Janne Schurmann and Østergaard, Doris and Viereck, Søren and Overton, Jerry and Folke, Fredrik and Lippert, Freddy},
month = nov,
year = {2015},
pmid = {26530307},
pmcid = {PMC4632270}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"6BNuqFfu6dXhTewwG","bibbaseid":"mller-ersbll-tolstrup-stergaard-viereck-overton-folke-lippert-whyandwhencitizenscallforemergencyhelpanobservationalstudyof211193medicalemergencycalls-2015","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2017-09-06T17:33:01.026Z","title":"Why and when citizens call for emergency help: an observational study of 211,193 medical emergency calls","author_short":["Møller, T. P.","Ersbøll, A. K.","Tolstrup, J. S.","Østergaard, D.","Viereck, S.","Overton, J.","Folke, F.","Lippert, F."],"year":2015,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/users/3149334/collections/KFUQCSK2/items?key=jLdXwiLJvLsNCI6NjoJLO1Ly&format=bibtex&limit=100","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Why and when citizens call for emergency help: an observational study of 211,193 medical emergency calls","volume":"23","issn":"1757-7241","shorttitle":"Why and when citizens call for emergency help","url":"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4632270/","doi":"10.1186/s13049-015-0169-0","abstract":"Background A medical emergency call is citizens’ access to pre-hospital emergency care and ambulance services. Emergency medical dispatchers are gatekeepers to provision of pre-hospital resources and possibly hospital admissions. We explored causes for access, emergency priority levels, and temporal variation within seasons, weekdays, and time of day for emergency calls to the emergency medical dispatch center in Copenhagen in a two-year study period (December 1st, 2011 to November 30th, 2013). Methods Descriptive analysis was performed for causes for access and emergency priority levels. A Poisson regression model was used to calculate adjusted ratio estimates for the association between seasons, weekdays, and time of day overall and stratified by emergency priority levels. Results We analyzed 211,193 emergency calls for temporal variation. Of those, 167,635 calls were eligible for analysis of causes and emergency priority level. “Unclear problem” was the most frequent category (19 %). The five most common causes with known origin were categorized as “Wounds, fractures, minor injuries” (13 %), “Chest pain/heart disease” (11 %), “Accidents” (9 %), “Intoxication, poisoning, drug overdose” (8 %), and “Breathing difficulties” (7 %). The highest emergency priority levels (Emergency priority level A and B) were assigned in 81 % of calls. In the analysis of temporal variation, the total number of calls peaked at wintertime (26 %), Saturdays (16 %), and during daytime (39 %). Conclusion The pattern of citizens’ contact causes fell into four overall categories: unclear problems, medical problems, intoxication and accidents. The majority of calls were urgent. The magnitude of unclear problems represents a modifiable factor and highlights the potential for further improvement of supportive dispatch priority tools or educational interventions at dispatch centers. Temporal variation was identified within seasons, weekdays and time of day and reflects both system load and disease occurrence. Data on contact patterns could be utilized in a public health perspective, benchmarking of EMS systems, and ultimately development of best practice in the area of emergency medicine. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-015-0169-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.","journal":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Møller"],"firstnames":["Thea","Palsgaard"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ersbøll"],"firstnames":["Annette","Kjær"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Tolstrup"],"firstnames":["Janne","Schurmann"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Østergaard"],"firstnames":["Doris"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Viereck"],"firstnames":["Søren"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Overton"],"firstnames":["Jerry"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Folke"],"firstnames":["Fredrik"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lippert"],"firstnames":["Freddy"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"November","year":"2015","pmid":"26530307","pmcid":"PMC4632270","bibtex":"@article{moller_why_2015,\n\ttitle = {Why and when citizens call for emergency help: an observational study of 211,193 medical emergency calls},\n\tvolume = {23},\n\tissn = {1757-7241},\n\tshorttitle = {Why and when citizens call for emergency help},\n\turl = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4632270/},\n\tdoi = {10.1186/s13049-015-0169-0},\n\tabstract = {Background\nA medical emergency call is citizens’ access to pre-hospital emergency care and ambulance services. Emergency medical dispatchers are gatekeepers to provision of pre-hospital resources and possibly hospital admissions. We explored causes for access, emergency priority levels, and temporal variation within seasons, weekdays, and time of day for emergency calls to the emergency medical dispatch center in Copenhagen in a two-year study period (December 1st, 2011 to November 30th, 2013).\n\nMethods\nDescriptive analysis was performed for causes for access and emergency priority levels. A Poisson regression model was used to calculate adjusted ratio estimates for the association between seasons, weekdays, and time of day overall and stratified by emergency priority levels.\n\nResults\nWe analyzed 211,193 emergency calls for temporal variation. Of those, 167,635 calls were eligible for analysis of causes and emergency priority level. “Unclear problem” was the most frequent category (19 \\%). The five most common causes with known origin were categorized as “Wounds, fractures, minor injuries” (13 \\%), “Chest pain/heart disease” (11 \\%), “Accidents” (9 \\%), “Intoxication, poisoning, drug overdose” (8 \\%), and “Breathing difficulties” (7 \\%). The highest emergency priority levels (Emergency priority level A and B) were assigned in 81 \\% of calls. In the analysis of temporal variation, the total number of calls peaked at wintertime (26 \\%), Saturdays (16 \\%), and during daytime (39 \\%).\n\nConclusion\nThe pattern of citizens’ contact causes fell into four overall categories: unclear problems, medical problems, intoxication and accidents. The majority of calls were urgent. The magnitude of unclear problems represents a modifiable factor and highlights the potential for further improvement of supportive dispatch priority tools or educational interventions at dispatch centers. Temporal variation was identified within seasons, weekdays and time of day and reflects both system load and disease occurrence. Data on contact patterns could be utilized in a public health perspective, benchmarking of EMS systems, and ultimately development of best practice in the area of emergency medicine.\n\nElectronic supplementary material\nThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13049-015-0169-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.},\n\tjournal = {Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine},\n\tauthor = {Møller, Thea Palsgaard and Ersbøll, Annette Kjær and Tolstrup, Janne Schurmann and Østergaard, Doris and Viereck, Søren and Overton, Jerry and Folke, Fredrik and Lippert, Freddy},\n\tmonth = nov,\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tpmid = {26530307},\n\tpmcid = {PMC4632270}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Møller, T. P.","Ersbøll, A. K.","Tolstrup, J. S.","Østergaard, D.","Viereck, S.","Overton, J.","Folke, F.","Lippert, F."],"key":"moller_why_2015","id":"moller_why_2015","bibbaseid":"mller-ersbll-tolstrup-stergaard-viereck-overton-folke-lippert-whyandwhencitizenscallforemergencyhelpanobservationalstudyof211193medicalemergencycalls-2015","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4632270/"},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["citizens","call","emergency","help","observational","study","211","193","medical","emergency","calls","møller","ersbøll","tolstrup","østergaard","viereck","overton","folke","lippert"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["7dJP3p4HTmqfYxtKw"]}