Colonization, whenua and capitalism: experiences from Aotearoa New Zealand. Moewaka Barnes, H., Eich, E., & Yessilth, S. Continuum, 32:1–13, October, 2018. doi abstract bibtex The English Laws Act, passed in 1858, declared the Laws of England applicable in New Zealand and cemented the hitherto alien ideology of land as property. Part of this ideology was the separation of tangata from whenua along with the separation of ownership of land from ownership of water. Māori, as tangata whenua – people of the land, made no such distinctions. Ownership affects how people ‘manage’ whenua (land), make decisions and account to the legal system. Under English law, financial considerations are at the forefront. In contrast, Māori kaitiakitanga values are concerned with the interests of land, understanding that the best interests of people will follow. Despite stark contrasts between the ideology of land as property and the ethics of kaitiakitanga – obligation, sustainability and nurture – Māori engage with mainstream agencies and lead by example in efforts to promote the wellbeing of people and environments in a unified approach. This paper outlines competing paradigms, changing relationships and challenges faced by communities who seek to nurture and respect whenua in the face of colonization. Interview data from Māori involved in community land-based initiatives illustrates past and present struggles and what some possibilities might be for the future.
@article{moewaka_barnes_colonization_2018,
title = {Colonization, whenua and capitalism: experiences from {Aotearoa} {New} {Zealand}},
volume = {32},
shorttitle = {Colonization, whenua and capitalism},
doi = {10.1080/10304312.2018.1525918},
abstract = {The English Laws Act, passed in 1858, declared the Laws of England applicable in New Zealand and cemented the hitherto alien ideology of land as property. Part of this ideology was the separation of tangata from whenua along with the separation of ownership of land from ownership of water. Māori, as tangata whenua – people of the land, made no such distinctions. Ownership affects how people ‘manage’ whenua (land), make decisions and account to the legal system. Under English law, financial considerations are at the forefront. In contrast, Māori kaitiakitanga values are concerned with the interests of land, understanding that the best interests of people will follow. Despite stark contrasts between the ideology of land as property and the ethics of kaitiakitanga – obligation, sustainability and nurture – Māori engage with mainstream agencies and lead by example in efforts to promote the wellbeing of people and environments in a unified approach. This paper outlines competing paradigms, changing relationships and challenges faced by communities who seek to nurture and respect whenua in the face of colonization. Interview data from Māori involved in community land-based initiatives illustrates past and present struggles and what some possibilities might be for the future.},
journal = {Continuum},
author = {Moewaka Barnes, Helen and Eich, E. and Yessilth, S.},
month = oct,
year = {2018},
keywords = {capitalism, colonisation, crown law, kaitiakitanga, whenua},
pages = {1--13},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"gXazpCtkWzMnaTc9G","bibbaseid":"moewakabarnes-eich-yessilth-colonizationwhenuaandcapitalismexperiencesfromaotearoanewzealand-2018","author_short":["Moewaka Barnes, H.","Eich, E.","Yessilth, S."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Colonization, whenua and capitalism: experiences from Aotearoa New Zealand","volume":"32","shorttitle":"Colonization, whenua and capitalism","doi":"10.1080/10304312.2018.1525918","abstract":"The English Laws Act, passed in 1858, declared the Laws of England applicable in New Zealand and cemented the hitherto alien ideology of land as property. Part of this ideology was the separation of tangata from whenua along with the separation of ownership of land from ownership of water. Māori, as tangata whenua – people of the land, made no such distinctions. Ownership affects how people ‘manage’ whenua (land), make decisions and account to the legal system. Under English law, financial considerations are at the forefront. In contrast, Māori kaitiakitanga values are concerned with the interests of land, understanding that the best interests of people will follow. Despite stark contrasts between the ideology of land as property and the ethics of kaitiakitanga – obligation, sustainability and nurture – Māori engage with mainstream agencies and lead by example in efforts to promote the wellbeing of people and environments in a unified approach. This paper outlines competing paradigms, changing relationships and challenges faced by communities who seek to nurture and respect whenua in the face of colonization. Interview data from Māori involved in community land-based initiatives illustrates past and present struggles and what some possibilities might be for the future.","journal":"Continuum","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Moewaka","Barnes"],"firstnames":["Helen"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Eich"],"firstnames":["E."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Yessilth"],"firstnames":["S."],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"October","year":"2018","keywords":"capitalism, colonisation, crown law, kaitiakitanga, whenua","pages":"1–13","bibtex":"@article{moewaka_barnes_colonization_2018,\n\ttitle = {Colonization, whenua and capitalism: experiences from {Aotearoa} {New} {Zealand}},\n\tvolume = {32},\n\tshorttitle = {Colonization, whenua and capitalism},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/10304312.2018.1525918},\n\tabstract = {The English Laws Act, passed in 1858, declared the Laws of England applicable in New Zealand and cemented the hitherto alien ideology of land as property. Part of this ideology was the separation of tangata from whenua along with the separation of ownership of land from ownership of water. Māori, as tangata whenua – people of the land, made no such distinctions. Ownership affects how people ‘manage’ whenua (land), make decisions and account to the legal system. Under English law, financial considerations are at the forefront. In contrast, Māori kaitiakitanga values are concerned with the interests of land, understanding that the best interests of people will follow. Despite stark contrasts between the ideology of land as property and the ethics of kaitiakitanga – obligation, sustainability and nurture – Māori engage with mainstream agencies and lead by example in efforts to promote the wellbeing of people and environments in a unified approach. This paper outlines competing paradigms, changing relationships and challenges faced by communities who seek to nurture and respect whenua in the face of colonization. Interview data from Māori involved in community land-based initiatives illustrates past and present struggles and what some possibilities might be for the future.},\n\tjournal = {Continuum},\n\tauthor = {Moewaka Barnes, Helen and Eich, E. and Yessilth, S.},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tkeywords = {capitalism, colonisation, crown law, kaitiakitanga, whenua},\n\tpages = {1--13},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Moewaka Barnes, H.","Eich, E.","Yessilth, S."],"key":"moewaka_barnes_colonization_2018","id":"moewaka_barnes_colonization_2018","bibbaseid":"moewakabarnes-eich-yessilth-colonizationwhenuaandcapitalismexperiencesfromaotearoanewzealand-2018","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["capitalism","colonisation","crown law","kaitiakitanga","whenua"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero-group/mylia1/4874224","dataSources":["jNemdstCpyFdzi6cr"],"keywords":["capitalism","colonisation","crown law","kaitiakitanga","whenua"],"search_terms":["colonization","whenua","capitalism","experiences","aotearoa","new","zealand","moewaka barnes","eich","yessilth"],"title":"Colonization, whenua and capitalism: experiences from Aotearoa New Zealand","year":2018}