Measuring Meaning Structures. Mohr, J. W. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1):345–370, 1998.
Paper doi abstract bibtex The recent cultural turn in American sociology has inspired a number of more scientifically oriented scholars to study the meanings that are embedded within institutions, practices, and cultural artifacts. I focus here on research that (a) emphasizes institutional (rather than individual) meanings, (b) uses a structural approach to interpretation, and (c) employs formal algorithms or quantitative procedures for reducing the complexity of meanings to simpler structural principles. I discuss two core methodological issues—the assessment of similarities and differences between items in a cultural system and the process by which structure-preserving simplifications are found in the data. I also highlight the importance of two-mode analytic procedures and I review some of the perceived benefits and criticisms of this style of research.
@article{mohr_measuring_1998,
title = {Measuring {Meaning} {Structures}},
volume = {24},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.345},
doi = {10/bd3tpf},
abstract = {The recent cultural turn in American sociology has inspired a number of more scientifically oriented scholars to study the meanings that are embedded within institutions, practices, and cultural artifacts. I focus here on research that (a) emphasizes institutional (rather than individual) meanings, (b) uses a structural approach to interpretation, and (c) employs formal algorithms or quantitative procedures for reducing the complexity of meanings to simpler structural principles. I discuss two core methodological issues—the assessment of similarities and differences between items in a cultural system and the process by which structure-preserving simplifications are found in the data. I also highlight the importance of two-mode analytic procedures and I review some of the perceived benefits and criticisms of this style of research.},
number = {1},
urldate = {2018-12-19},
journal = {Annual Review of Sociology},
author = {Mohr, John W.},
year = {1998},
pages = {345--370},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"t8f5vHitFDr9jS84E","bibbaseid":"mohr-measuringmeaningstructures-1998","author_short":["Mohr, J. W."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Measuring Meaning Structures","volume":"24","url":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.345","doi":"10/bd3tpf","abstract":"The recent cultural turn in American sociology has inspired a number of more scientifically oriented scholars to study the meanings that are embedded within institutions, practices, and cultural artifacts. I focus here on research that (a) emphasizes institutional (rather than individual) meanings, (b) uses a structural approach to interpretation, and (c) employs formal algorithms or quantitative procedures for reducing the complexity of meanings to simpler structural principles. I discuss two core methodological issues—the assessment of similarities and differences between items in a cultural system and the process by which structure-preserving simplifications are found in the data. I also highlight the importance of two-mode analytic procedures and I review some of the perceived benefits and criticisms of this style of research.","number":"1","urldate":"2018-12-19","journal":"Annual Review of Sociology","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Mohr"],"firstnames":["John","W."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"1998","pages":"345–370","bibtex":"@article{mohr_measuring_1998,\n\ttitle = {Measuring {Meaning} {Structures}},\n\tvolume = {24},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.345},\n\tdoi = {10/bd3tpf},\n\tabstract = {The recent cultural turn in American sociology has inspired a number of more scientifically oriented scholars to study the meanings that are embedded within institutions, practices, and cultural artifacts. I focus here on research that (a) emphasizes institutional (rather than individual) meanings, (b) uses a structural approach to interpretation, and (c) employs formal algorithms or quantitative procedures for reducing the complexity of meanings to simpler structural principles. I discuss two core methodological issues—the assessment of similarities and differences between items in a cultural system and the process by which structure-preserving simplifications are found in the data. I also highlight the importance of two-mode analytic procedures and I review some of the perceived benefits and criticisms of this style of research.},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2018-12-19},\n\tjournal = {Annual Review of Sociology},\n\tauthor = {Mohr, John W.},\n\tyear = {1998},\n\tpages = {345--370},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Mohr, J. W."],"key":"mohr_measuring_1998","id":"mohr_measuring_1998","bibbaseid":"mohr-measuringmeaningstructures-1998","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.345"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/MichelotFlorent","dataSources":["FYDkaYvXGKXpPbdLN"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["measuring","meaning","structures","mohr"],"title":"Measuring Meaning Structures","year":1998}