A critical review of "End-to-End arguments in system design". Moors, T. ICC 2002. IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2:1214-1219, October, 2002.
bibtex   
@article{ Moors02,
  author = {T. Moors},
  title = {A critical review of "End-to-End arguments in system design"},
  journal = {ICC 2002. IEEE International Conference on Communications},
  year = {2002},
  volume = {2},
  pages = {1214-1219},
  month = {October},
  annote = {This paper reviews the end-to-end arguments, highlighting their subleties, and provides additional arguments for and against end-to-end implementations. It discusses, for example, how to determine if the the end-to-end arguments are applicable to a certain service. The author means that it is important to consider what entity is responsible for ensuring the service, and the extent to which that entity can trust other entities to maintain that service. For example, as congestion is a phenomenon of the network, it is the network that is responsible for isolating endpoints that offer excessive traffic so the network can provide its service to other endpoints. Furthermore, as the network has no reason to trust the endpoints, congestion control should be implemented in the network (and not in transport protocols)},
  submitter = {Katarina Asplund},
  bibdate = {Wednesday, October 23, 2002 at 15:23:07 (CEST)}
}

Downloads: 0