@article{ moos_characteristics_1995,
  title = {Characteristics and {Outcomes} of {Three} {Models} of {Community} {Residential} {Care} for {Substance} {Abuse} {Patients}},
  abstract = {Three models of transitional residential community care for substance abuse patients are defined on the basis of the differential provision of health \& treatment services: a psychosocial model, a supportive rehabilitation model, \& an intensive treatment model. Facilities that provided a high level of on site health \& treatment services were categorized as following an intensive treatment model. Results from a survey of 127 residential care facility managers indicate that facilities following an intensive treatment model had the strongest emphasis on medical, dual diagnosis, \& family treatment orientations. These facilities also had clearer policies \& provided residents more opportunities to participate in setting policies; however, staff were not more accepting of patient impairment or problem behavior. Patients obtained more outpatient mental health aftercare. In each of the 3 types of facilities, a longer length of care was associated with a lower readmission rate; patients who dropped out of psychosocial model facilities had especially high readmission rates. Overall, the findings identify substantial variations among facilities, but show relatively little matching of patients' needs with facility services \& programs. 5 Tables, 35 References. Adapted from the source document. (Copyright 1996, Sociological Abstracts, Inc., all rights reserved.)},
  journal = {Journal of Substance Abuse; 1995, 7, 1, 99 116.},
  author = {Moos, Rudolf H. and Pettit, Becky and Gruber, Valerie A.},
  year = {1995}
}

{"_id":"sBrtWYbWKhKTpD2aW","bibbaseid":"moos-pettit-gruber-characteristicsandoutcomesofthreemodelsofcommunityresidentialcareforsubstanceabusepatients-1995","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2015-04-17T00:35:40.562Z","title":"Characteristics and Outcomes of Three Models of Community Residential Care for Substance Abuse Patients","author_short":["Moos, R.<nbsp>H.","Pettit, B.","Gruber, V.<nbsp>A."],"year":1995,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero/djjr","bibdata":{"abstract":"Three models of transitional residential community care for substance abuse patients are defined on the basis of the differential provision of health \\& treatment services: a psychosocial model, a supportive rehabilitation model, \\& an intensive treatment model. Facilities that provided a high level of on site health \\& treatment services were categorized as following an intensive treatment model. Results from a survey of 127 residential care facility managers indicate that facilities following an intensive treatment model had the strongest emphasis on medical, dual diagnosis, \\& family treatment orientations. These facilities also had clearer policies \\& provided residents more opportunities to participate in setting policies; however, staff were not more accepting of patient impairment or problem behavior. Patients obtained more outpatient mental health aftercare. In each of the 3 types of facilities, a longer length of care was associated with a lower readmission rate; patients who dropped out of psychosocial model facilities had especially high readmission rates. Overall, the findings identify substantial variations among facilities, but show relatively little matching of patients' needs with facility services \\& programs. 5 Tables, 35 References. Adapted from the source document. (Copyright 1996, Sociological Abstracts, Inc., all rights reserved.)","author":["Moos, Rudolf H.","Pettit, Becky","Gruber, Valerie A."],"author_short":["Moos, R.<nbsp>H.","Pettit, B.","Gruber, V.<nbsp>A."],"bibtex":"@article{ moos_characteristics_1995,\n title = {Characteristics and {Outcomes} of {Three} {Models} of {Community} {Residential} {Care} for {Substance} {Abuse} {Patients}},\n abstract = {Three models of transitional residential community care for substance abuse patients are defined on the basis of the differential provision of health \\& treatment services: a psychosocial model, a supportive rehabilitation model, \\& an intensive treatment model. Facilities that provided a high level of on site health \\& treatment services were categorized as following an intensive treatment model. Results from a survey of 127 residential care facility managers indicate that facilities following an intensive treatment model had the strongest emphasis on medical, dual diagnosis, \\& family treatment orientations. These facilities also had clearer policies \\& provided residents more opportunities to participate in setting policies; however, staff were not more accepting of patient impairment or problem behavior. Patients obtained more outpatient mental health aftercare. In each of the 3 types of facilities, a longer length of care was associated with a lower readmission rate; patients who dropped out of psychosocial model facilities had especially high readmission rates. Overall, the findings identify substantial variations among facilities, but show relatively little matching of patients' needs with facility services \\& programs. 5 Tables, 35 References. Adapted from the source document. (Copyright 1996, Sociological Abstracts, Inc., all rights reserved.)},\n journal = {Journal of Substance Abuse; 1995, 7, 1, 99 116.},\n author = {Moos, Rudolf H. and Pettit, Becky and Gruber, Valerie A.},\n year = {1995}\n}","bibtype":"article","id":"moos_characteristics_1995","journal":"Journal of Substance Abuse; 1995, 7, 1, 99 116.","key":"moos_characteristics_1995","title":"Characteristics and Outcomes of Three Models of Community Residential Care for Substance Abuse Patients","type":"article","year":"1995","bibbaseid":"moos-pettit-gruber-characteristicsandoutcomesofthreemodelsofcommunityresidentialcareforsubstanceabusepatients-1995","role":"author","urls":{},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["characteristics","outcomes","three","models","community","residential","care","substance","abuse","patients","moos","pettit","gruber"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["Xm6L6ijSnPNgxubpW"]}