{"_id":"sPSuSywxEDh6NZNAs","bibbaseid":"mukherjee-leadershipnetworkandteamperformanceininteractivecontests-2016","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-09-09T06:27:36.226Z","title":"Leadership network and team performance in interactive contests","author_short":["Mukherjee, S."],"year":2016,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://www.sfu.ca/~howlett/howlett16.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Leadership network and team performance in interactive contests","volume":"47","issn":"0378-8733","url":"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873316300016","doi":"10.1016/j.socnet.2016.05.003","abstract":"Over the years, the concept of leadership has experienced a paradigm shift – from solitary leader (centralized leadership) to de-centralized leadership or distributed leadership. This paper explores the idea that centralized leadership, as earlier suggested, negatively impacts team performance. I applied the hypothesis to cricket, a sport in which leaders play an important role in team's success. I generated batting partnership network and evaluated the central-most player in the team, applying tools of social network analysis. Analyzing 3420 matches in one day international cricket and 1979 Test matches involving 10 teams, I examined the impact of centralized leadership in outcome of a contest. I observed that the odds for winning a one day international match under centralized leadership is 30% higher than the odds for winning under de-centralized leadership. In both forms of cricket (Test and one day international), I failed to find evidence that distributed leadership is associated with higher team performance. These results suggest important implications for cricket administrators in development and management of working teams.","urldate":"2016-08-28","journal":"Social Networks","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Mukherjee"],"firstnames":["Satyam"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"October","year":"2016","keywords":"Centralized leadership, De-centralized leadership, social network analysis, Sports","pages":"85--92","file":"ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:files/56425/Mukherjee - 2016 - Leadership network and team performance in interac.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:files/56426/S0378873316300016.html:text/html","bibtex":"@article{mukherjee_leadership_2016,\n\ttitle = {Leadership network and team performance in interactive contests},\n\tvolume = {47},\n\tissn = {0378-8733},\n\turl = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873316300016},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.socnet.2016.05.003},\n\tabstract = {Over the years, the concept of leadership has experienced a paradigm shift – from solitary leader (centralized leadership) to de-centralized leadership or distributed leadership. This paper explores the idea that centralized leadership, as earlier suggested, negatively impacts team performance. I applied the hypothesis to cricket, a sport in which leaders play an important role in team's success. I generated batting partnership network and evaluated the central-most player in the team, applying tools of social network analysis. Analyzing 3420 matches in one day international cricket and 1979 Test matches involving 10 teams, I examined the impact of centralized leadership in outcome of a contest. I observed that the odds for winning a one day international match under centralized leadership is 30\\% higher than the odds for winning under de-centralized leadership. In both forms of cricket (Test and one day international), I failed to find evidence that distributed leadership is associated with higher team performance. These results suggest important implications for cricket administrators in development and management of working teams.},\n\turldate = {2016-08-28},\n\tjournal = {Social Networks},\n\tauthor = {Mukherjee, Satyam},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tkeywords = {Centralized leadership, De-centralized leadership, social network analysis, Sports},\n\tpages = {85--92},\n\tfile = {ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:files/56425/Mukherjee - 2016 - Leadership network and team performance in interac.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:files/56426/S0378873316300016.html:text/html}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Mukherjee, S."],"key":"mukherjee_leadership_2016","id":"mukherjee_leadership_2016","bibbaseid":"mukherjee-leadershipnetworkandteamperformanceininteractivecontests-2016","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873316300016"},"keyword":["Centralized leadership","De-centralized leadership","social network analysis","Sports"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["leadership","network","team","performance","interactive","contests","mukherjee"],"keywords":["centralized leadership","de-centralized leadership","social network analysis","sports"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["Bn7xRaKMY43f7hFwh"]}