Evaluation of Registration Methods on Thoracic CT: The EMPIRE10 Challenge. Murphy, K., van Ginneken, B., Reinhardt, J., M., Kabus, S., Kai Ding, Xiang Deng, Kunlin Cao, Kaifang Du, Christensen, G., E., Garcia, V., Vercauteren, T., Ayache, N., Commowick, O., Malandain, G., Glocker, B., Paragios, N., Navab, N., Gorbunova, V., Sporring, J., de Bruijne, M., Xiao Han, Heinrich, M., P., Schnabel, J., A., Jenkinson, M., Lorenz, C., Modat, M., McClelland, J., R., Ourselin, S., Muenzing, S., E., A., Viergever, M., A., De Nigris, D., Collins, D., L., Arbel, T., Peroni, M., Rui Li, Sharp, G., C., Schmidt-Richberg, A., Ehrhardt, J., Werner, R., Smeets, D., Loeckx, D., Gang Song, Tustison, N., Avants, B., Gee, J., C., Staring, M., Klein, S., Stoel, B., C., Urschler, M., Werlberger, M., Vandemeulebroucke, J., Rit, S., Sarrut, D., & Pluim, J., P., W. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 30(11):1901-1920, 11, 2011.
Evaluation of Registration Methods on Thoracic CT: The EMPIRE10 Challenge [link]Website  doi  abstract   bibtex   
EMPIRE10 (Evaluation of Methods for Pulmonary Image REgistration 2010) is a public platform for fair and meaningful comparison of registration algorithms which are applied to a database of intrapatient thoracic CT image pairs. Evaluation of nonrigid registration techniques is a nontrivial task. This is compounded by the fact that researchers typically test only on their own data, which varies widely. For this reason, reliable assessment and comparison of different registration algorithms has been virtually impossible in the past. In this work we present the results of the launch phase of EMPIRE10, which comprised the comprehensive evaluation and comparison of 20 individual algorithms from leading academic and industrial research groups. All algorithms are applied to the same set of 30 thoracic CT pairs. Algorithm settings and parameters are chosen by researchers expert in the configuration of their own method and the evaluation is independent, using the same criteria for all participants. All results are published on the EMPIRE10 website (http://empire10.isi.uu.nl). The challenge remains ongoing and open to new participants. Full results from 24 algorithms have been published at the time of writing. This paper details the organization of the challenge, the data and evaluation methods and the outcome of the initial launch with 20 algorithms. The gain in knowledge and future work are discussed. © 2011 IEEE.
@article{
 title = {Evaluation of Registration Methods on Thoracic CT: The EMPIRE10 Challenge},
 type = {article},
 year = {2011},
 keywords = {Chest,computed tomography,evaluation,registration},
 pages = {1901-1920},
 volume = {30},
 websites = {http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5782992/},
 month = {11},
 id = {e864dfe0-8280-385c-9616-0708fb0e0d8d},
 created = {2015-02-18T08:30:20.000Z},
 file_attached = {false},
 profile_id = {53d1e3c7-2f16-3c81-9a84-dccd45be4841},
 last_modified = {2019-11-08T01:40:27.394Z},
 read = {false},
 starred = {false},
 authored = {true},
 confirmed = {true},
 hidden = {false},
 citation_key = {Murphy2011},
 folder_uuids = {0ec41d70-75f1-4a99-820b-0a83ccc37f54},
 private_publication = {false},
 abstract = {EMPIRE10 (Evaluation of Methods for Pulmonary Image REgistration 2010) is a public platform for fair and meaningful comparison of registration algorithms which are applied to a database of intrapatient thoracic CT image pairs. Evaluation of nonrigid registration techniques is a nontrivial task. This is compounded by the fact that researchers typically test only on their own data, which varies widely. For this reason, reliable assessment and comparison of different registration algorithms has been virtually impossible in the past. In this work we present the results of the launch phase of EMPIRE10, which comprised the comprehensive evaluation and comparison of 20 individual algorithms from leading academic and industrial research groups. All algorithms are applied to the same set of 30 thoracic CT pairs. Algorithm settings and parameters are chosen by researchers expert in the configuration of their own method and the evaluation is independent, using the same criteria for all participants. All results are published on the EMPIRE10 website (http://empire10.isi.uu.nl). The challenge remains ongoing and open to new participants. Full results from 24 algorithms have been published at the time of writing. This paper details the organization of the challenge, the data and evaluation methods and the outcome of the initial launch with 20 algorithms. The gain in knowledge and future work are discussed. © 2011 IEEE.},
 bibtype = {article},
 author = {Murphy, Keelin and van Ginneken, B. and Reinhardt, Joseph M. and Kabus, Sven and Kai Ding, undefined and Xiang Deng, undefined and Kunlin Cao, undefined and Kaifang Du, undefined and Christensen, Gary E. and Garcia, Vincent and Vercauteren, Tom and Ayache, Nicholas and Commowick, Olivier and Malandain, Grgoire and Glocker, Ben and Paragios, Nikos and Navab, Nassir and Gorbunova, Vladlena and Sporring, Jon and de Bruijne, M. and Xiao Han, undefined and Heinrich, Mattias P. and Schnabel, Julia A. and Jenkinson, Mark and Lorenz, Cristian and Modat, Marc and McClelland, Jamie R. and Ourselin, Sebastien and Muenzing, S. E. A. and Viergever, Max A. and De Nigris, Dante and Collins, D. Louis and Arbel, Tal and Peroni, Marta and Rui Li, undefined and Sharp, Gregory C. and Schmidt-Richberg, Alexander and Ehrhardt, Jan and Werner, René and Smeets, Dirk and Loeckx, Dirk and Gang Song, undefined and Tustison, Nicholas and Avants, Brian and Gee, James C. and Staring, Marius and Klein, Stefan and Stoel, Berend C. and Urschler, Martin and Werlberger, Manuel and Vandemeulebroucke, Jef and Rit, Simon and Sarrut, David and Pluim, J. P. W.},
 doi = {10.1109/TMI.2011.2158349},
 journal = {IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging},
 number = {11}
}
Downloads: 0
About
Documentation
Keywords
Search
Users
Terms and Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Sitemap
© BibBase.org 2021