@article{murphy-berman_cross-cultural_2002,
	title = {Cross-cultural differences in perceptions of distributive justice: {A} comparison of hong kong and indonesia},
	volume = {33},
	abstract = {Respondents in Hong Kong and Indonesia rated a hypothetical allocator depicted as distributing resources based on merit or need in either a positive (reward) or negative (cutback) resource context. Hong Kong respondents perceived that the use of merit was fairer and more principled than the use of need, but they also perceived that the allocator who favored merit was less nice, more selfish, and acted less because of concern for others'welfare. Indonesian respondents saw the use of need as being fairer than the use of merit, and they perceived that the allocator who favored the needy was nicer and acted more out of concern for others. Cultural differences in respondents' perceptions were greater for the use of merit than for the use of need. Respondents from both cultures tended to rate the allocator more positively when resources were being given out than when resources were being taken away.},
	number = {2466},
	journal = {Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology},
	author = {Murphy-Berman, V. and Berman, J.J.},
	month = mar,
	year = {2002},
	keywords = {justice perceptions International comparison distributive justice},
	pages = {157--170},
}

{"_id":"oTZ3rXGBBMsvPypBd","bibbaseid":"murphyberman-berman-crossculturaldifferencesinperceptionsofdistributivejusticeacomparisonofhongkongandindonesia-2002","author_short":["Murphy-Berman, V.","Berman, J."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Cross-cultural differences in perceptions of distributive justice: A comparison of hong kong and indonesia","volume":"33","abstract":"Respondents in Hong Kong and Indonesia rated a hypothetical allocator depicted as distributing resources based on merit or need in either a positive (reward) or negative (cutback) resource context. Hong Kong respondents perceived that the use of merit was fairer and more principled than the use of need, but they also perceived that the allocator who favored merit was less nice, more selfish, and acted less because of concern for others'welfare. Indonesian respondents saw the use of need as being fairer than the use of merit, and they perceived that the allocator who favored the needy was nicer and acted more out of concern for others. Cultural differences in respondents' perceptions were greater for the use of merit than for the use of need. Respondents from both cultures tended to rate the allocator more positively when resources were being given out than when resources were being taken away.","number":"2466","journal":"Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Murphy-Berman"],"firstnames":["V."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Berman"],"firstnames":["J.J."],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"March","year":"2002","keywords":"justice perceptions International comparison distributive justice","pages":"157–170","bibtex":"@article{murphy-berman_cross-cultural_2002,\n\ttitle = {Cross-cultural differences in perceptions of distributive justice: {A} comparison of hong kong and indonesia},\n\tvolume = {33},\n\tabstract = {Respondents in Hong Kong and Indonesia rated a hypothetical allocator depicted as distributing resources based on merit or need in either a positive (reward) or negative (cutback) resource context. Hong Kong respondents perceived that the use of merit was fairer and more principled than the use of need, but they also perceived that the allocator who favored merit was less nice, more selfish, and acted less because of concern for others'welfare. Indonesian respondents saw the use of need as being fairer than the use of merit, and they perceived that the allocator who favored the needy was nicer and acted more out of concern for others. Cultural differences in respondents' perceptions were greater for the use of merit than for the use of need. Respondents from both cultures tended to rate the allocator more positively when resources were being given out than when resources were being taken away.},\n\tnumber = {2466},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology},\n\tauthor = {Murphy-Berman, V. and Berman, J.J.},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2002},\n\tkeywords = {justice perceptions International comparison distributive justice},\n\tpages = {157--170},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Murphy-Berman, V.","Berman, J."],"key":"murphy-berman_cross-cultural_2002","id":"murphy-berman_cross-cultural_2002","bibbaseid":"murphyberman-berman-crossculturaldifferencesinperceptionsofdistributivejusticeacomparisonofhongkongandindonesia-2002","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["justice perceptions International comparison distributive justice"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/4416347/items?key=uWYsPIjzwympNIvDGgZWMkdz&format=bibtex&limit=100","dataSources":["6PgkRDfF3fifc5MNw"],"keywords":["justice perceptions international comparison distributive justice"],"search_terms":["cross","cultural","differences","perceptions","distributive","justice","comparison","hong","kong","indonesia","murphy-berman","berman"],"title":"Cross-cultural differences in perceptions of distributive justice: A comparison of hong kong and indonesia","year":2002}