Preserved metacognition despite impaired perception of intentionality cues in schizophrenia

Preserved metacognition despite impaired perception of intentionality cues in schizophrenia. Muthesius, A., Grothey, F., Cunningham, C., Hölzer, S., Vogeley, K., & Schultz, J. medRxiv, May, 2021. ZSCC: NoCitationData[s0]

Paper doi abstract bibtex

\textlessh3\textgreaterAbstract\textless/h3\textgreater \textlessp\textgreaterSocial cognition and metacognition are frequently impaired in schizophrenia, and these impairments complicate recovery. Recent work suggests that different aspects of metacognition may not be impaired to the same degree. Furthermore, metacognition and the cognitive capacity being monitored need not be similarly impaired. Here, we assessed performance in detecting cues of intentional behaviour as well as metacognition about detecting those cues in schizophrenia. Thirty patients and controls categorized animations of moving dots into those displaying a dyadic interaction demonstrating a chase or no chase and indicated their confidence in these judgments. Perception and metacognition were assessed using signal detection theoretic measures, which were analysed using frequentist and Bayesian statistics. Patients showed a deficit compared to controls in detecting intentionality cues, but showed preserved metacognitive performance into this task. Our study reveals a selective deficit in the perception of intentionality cues, but preserved metacognitive insight into the validity of this perception. It thus appears that impairment of metacognition in schizophrenia varies across cognitive domains - metacognition should not be considered a monolithic stone that is either impaired or unimpaired.\textless/p\textgreater

@article{muthesius_preserved_2021,
	title = {Preserved metacognition despite impaired perception of intentionality cues in schizophrenia},
	copyright = {© 2021, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/},
	url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.18.21257368v1},
	doi = {10.1101/2021.05.18.21257368},
	abstract = {{\textless}h3{\textgreater}Abstract{\textless}/h3{\textgreater} {\textless}p{\textgreater}Social cognition and metacognition are frequently impaired in schizophrenia, and these impairments complicate recovery. Recent work suggests that different aspects of metacognition may not be impaired to the same degree. Furthermore, metacognition and the cognitive capacity being monitored need not be similarly impaired. Here, we assessed performance in detecting cues of intentional behaviour as well as metacognition about detecting those cues in schizophrenia. Thirty patients and controls categorized animations of moving dots into those displaying a dyadic interaction demonstrating a chase or no chase and indicated their confidence in these judgments. Perception and metacognition were assessed using signal detection theoretic measures, which were analysed using frequentist and Bayesian statistics. Patients showed a deficit compared to controls in detecting intentionality cues, but showed preserved metacognitive performance into this task. Our study reveals a selective deficit in the perception of intentionality cues, but preserved metacognitive insight into the validity of this perception. It thus appears that impairment of metacognition in schizophrenia varies across cognitive domains - metacognition should not be considered a monolithic stone that is either impaired or unimpaired.{\textless}/p{\textgreater}},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2021-06-23},
	journal = {medRxiv},
	author = {Muthesius, Ana and Grothey, Farina and Cunningham, Carter and Hölzer, Susanne and Vogeley, Kai and Schultz, Johannes},
	month = may,
	year = {2021},
	note = {ZSCC: NoCitationData[s0]},
	pages = {2021.05.18.21257368},
}

Downloads: 0

{"_id":"mRe7qkzBkmt8F8LJe","bibbaseid":"muthesius-grothey-cunningham-hlzer-vogeley-schultz-preservedmetacognitiondespiteimpairedperceptionofintentionalitycuesinschizophrenia-2021","author_short":["Muthesius, A.","Grothey, F.","Cunningham, C.","Hölzer, S.","Vogeley, K.","Schultz, J."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Preserved metacognition despite impaired perception of intentionality cues in schizophrenia","copyright":"© 2021, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","url":"https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.18.21257368v1","doi":"10.1101/2021.05.18.21257368","abstract":"\\textlessh3\\textgreaterAbstract\\textless/h3\\textgreater \\textlessp\\textgreaterSocial cognition and metacognition are frequently impaired in schizophrenia, and these impairments complicate recovery. Recent work suggests that different aspects of metacognition may not be impaired to the same degree. Furthermore, metacognition and the cognitive capacity being monitored need not be similarly impaired. Here, we assessed performance in detecting cues of intentional behaviour as well as metacognition about detecting those cues in schizophrenia. Thirty patients and controls categorized animations of moving dots into those displaying a dyadic interaction demonstrating a chase or no chase and indicated their confidence in these judgments. Perception and metacognition were assessed using signal detection theoretic measures, which were analysed using frequentist and Bayesian statistics. Patients showed a deficit compared to controls in detecting intentionality cues, but showed preserved metacognitive performance into this task. Our study reveals a selective deficit in the perception of intentionality cues, but preserved metacognitive insight into the validity of this perception. It thus appears that impairment of metacognition in schizophrenia varies across cognitive domains - metacognition should not be considered a monolithic stone that is either impaired or unimpaired.\\textless/p\\textgreater","language":"en","urldate":"2021-06-23","journal":"medRxiv","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Muthesius"],"firstnames":["Ana"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Grothey"],"firstnames":["Farina"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Cunningham"],"firstnames":["Carter"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hölzer"],"firstnames":["Susanne"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Vogeley"],"firstnames":["Kai"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Schultz"],"firstnames":["Johannes"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"May","year":"2021","note":"ZSCC: NoCitationData[s0]","pages":"2021.05.18.21257368","bibtex":"@article{muthesius_preserved_2021,\n\ttitle = {Preserved metacognition despite impaired perception of intentionality cues in schizophrenia},\n\tcopyright = {© 2021, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/},\n\turl = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.18.21257368v1},\n\tdoi = {10.1101/2021.05.18.21257368},\n\tabstract = {{\\textless}h3{\\textgreater}Abstract{\\textless}/h3{\\textgreater} {\\textless}p{\\textgreater}Social cognition and metacognition are frequently impaired in schizophrenia, and these impairments complicate recovery. Recent work suggests that different aspects of metacognition may not be impaired to the same degree. Furthermore, metacognition and the cognitive capacity being monitored need not be similarly impaired. Here, we assessed performance in detecting cues of intentional behaviour as well as metacognition about detecting those cues in schizophrenia. Thirty patients and controls categorized animations of moving dots into those displaying a dyadic interaction demonstrating a chase or no chase and indicated their confidence in these judgments. Perception and metacognition were assessed using signal detection theoretic measures, which were analysed using frequentist and Bayesian statistics. Patients showed a deficit compared to controls in detecting intentionality cues, but showed preserved metacognitive performance into this task. Our study reveals a selective deficit in the perception of intentionality cues, but preserved metacognitive insight into the validity of this perception. It thus appears that impairment of metacognition in schizophrenia varies across cognitive domains - metacognition should not be considered a monolithic stone that is either impaired or unimpaired.{\\textless}/p{\\textgreater}},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2021-06-23},\n\tjournal = {medRxiv},\n\tauthor = {Muthesius, Ana and Grothey, Farina and Cunningham, Carter and Hölzer, Susanne and Vogeley, Kai and Schultz, Johannes},\n\tmonth = may,\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tnote = {ZSCC: NoCitationData[s0]},\n\tpages = {2021.05.18.21257368},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Muthesius, A.","Grothey, F.","Cunningham, C.","Hölzer, S.","Vogeley, K.","Schultz, J."],"key":"muthesius_preserved_2021","id":"muthesius_preserved_2021","bibbaseid":"muthesius-grothey-cunningham-hlzer-vogeley-schultz-preservedmetacognitiondespiteimpairedperceptionofintentionalitycuesinschizophrenia-2021","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.18.21257368v1"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/saracatanese","dataSources":["eTsH756eicg6vxuG3"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["preserved","metacognition","despite","impaired","perception","intentionality","cues","schizophrenia","muthesius","grothey","cunningham","hölzer","vogeley","schultz"],"title":"Preserved metacognition despite impaired perception of intentionality cues in schizophrenia","year":2021}