@Article{Nazzi2005,
  author   = {Nazzi, Thierry},
  journal  = {Cognition},
  title    = {Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words: differences between consonants and vowels},
  year     = {2005},
  number   = {1},
  pages    = {13--30},
  volume   = {98},
  abstract = {The present study explores the issue of the use of phonetic specificity
	in the process of learning new words at 20 months of age. The procedure
	used follows Nazzi and Gopnik [Nazzi, T., & Gopnik, A. (2001). Linguistic
	and cognitive abilities in infancy: When does language become a tool
	for categorization? Cognition, 80, B11-B20]. Infants were first presented
	with triads of perceptually dissimilar objects, which were given
	made-up names, two of the objects receiving the same name. Then,
	word learning was evaluated through object selection/categorization.
	Tests involved phonetically different words (e.g. [pize] vs. [mora],
	Experiment 1), words differing minimally on their onset consonant
	(e.g. [pize] vs. [tize], Experiment 2a), and conditions which had
	never been tested before: non-initial consonantal contrasts (e.g.
	[pide] vs. [pige], Experiment 2b), and vocalic contrasts (e.g. [pize]
	vs. [pyze]; [pize] vs. [paze]; [pize] vs. [pizu], Experiments 3a-c).
	Results differed across conditions: words could be easily learnt
	in the phonetically different condition, and were learnt, though
	to a lesser degree, in both the initial and non-initial minimal consonant
	contrast; however, infants' global performance on all three vocalic
	contrasts was at chance level. The present results shed new light
	regarding the specificity of early words, and raise the possibility
	of different contributions for vowels and consonants in early word
	learning.},
  keywords = {Language acquisition, Word learning, Object categorization, Phonetic specificity, Consonants/vowels},
}

{"_id":"z4BPHW7m5DHz8ebNK","bibbaseid":"nazzi-useofphoneticspecificityduringtheacquisitionofnewwordsdifferencesbetweenconsonantsandvowels-2005","author_short":["Nazzi, T."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Nazzi"],"firstnames":["Thierry"],"suffixes":[]}],"journal":"Cognition","title":"Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words: differences between consonants and vowels","year":"2005","number":"1","pages":"13–30","volume":"98","abstract":"The present study explores the issue of the use of phonetic specificity in the process of learning new words at 20 months of age. The procedure used follows Nazzi and Gopnik [Nazzi, T., & Gopnik, A. (2001). Linguistic and cognitive abilities in infancy: When does language become a tool for categorization? Cognition, 80, B11-B20]. Infants were first presented with triads of perceptually dissimilar objects, which were given made-up names, two of the objects receiving the same name. Then, word learning was evaluated through object selection/categorization. Tests involved phonetically different words (e.g. [pize] vs. [mora], Experiment 1), words differing minimally on their onset consonant (e.g. [pize] vs. [tize], Experiment 2a), and conditions which had never been tested before: non-initial consonantal contrasts (e.g. [pide] vs. [pige], Experiment 2b), and vocalic contrasts (e.g. [pize] vs. [pyze]; [pize] vs. [paze]; [pize] vs. [pizu], Experiments 3a-c). Results differed across conditions: words could be easily learnt in the phonetically different condition, and were learnt, though to a lesser degree, in both the initial and non-initial minimal consonant contrast; however, infants' global performance on all three vocalic contrasts was at chance level. The present results shed new light regarding the specificity of early words, and raise the possibility of different contributions for vowels and consonants in early word learning.","keywords":"Language acquisition, Word learning, Object categorization, Phonetic specificity, Consonants/vowels","bibtex":"@Article{Nazzi2005,\n author = {Nazzi, Thierry},\n journal = {Cognition},\n title = {Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words: differences between consonants and vowels},\n year = {2005},\n number = {1},\n pages = {13--30},\n volume = {98},\n abstract = {The present study explores the issue of the use of phonetic specificity\n\tin the process of learning new words at 20 months of age. The procedure\n\tused follows Nazzi and Gopnik [Nazzi, T., & Gopnik, A. (2001). Linguistic\n\tand cognitive abilities in infancy: When does language become a tool\n\tfor categorization? Cognition, 80, B11-B20]. Infants were first presented\n\twith triads of perceptually dissimilar objects, which were given\n\tmade-up names, two of the objects receiving the same name. Then,\n\tword learning was evaluated through object selection/categorization.\n\tTests involved phonetically different words (e.g. [pize] vs. [mora],\n\tExperiment 1), words differing minimally on their onset consonant\n\t(e.g. [pize] vs. [tize], Experiment 2a), and conditions which had\n\tnever been tested before: non-initial consonantal contrasts (e.g.\n\t[pide] vs. [pige], Experiment 2b), and vocalic contrasts (e.g. [pize]\n\tvs. [pyze]; [pize] vs. [paze]; [pize] vs. [pizu], Experiments 3a-c).\n\tResults differed across conditions: words could be easily learnt\n\tin the phonetically different condition, and were learnt, though\n\tto a lesser degree, in both the initial and non-initial minimal consonant\n\tcontrast; however, infants' global performance on all three vocalic\n\tcontrasts was at chance level. The present results shed new light\n\tregarding the specificity of early words, and raise the possibility\n\tof different contributions for vowels and consonants in early word\n\tlearning.},\n keywords = {Language acquisition, Word learning, Object categorization, Phonetic specificity, Consonants/vowels},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Nazzi, T."],"key":"Nazzi2005","id":"Nazzi2005","bibbaseid":"nazzi-useofphoneticspecificityduringtheacquisitionofnewwordsdifferencesbetweenconsonantsandvowels-2005","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Language acquisition","Word learning","Object categorization","Phonetic specificity","Consonants/vowels"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://endress.org/publications/ansgar.bib","dataSources":["xPGxHAeh3vZpx4yyE","TXa55dQbNoWnaGmMq"],"keywords":["language acquisition","word learning","object categorization","phonetic specificity","consonants/vowels"],"search_terms":["use","phonetic","specificity","during","acquisition","new","words","differences","between","consonants","vowels","nazzi"],"title":"Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words: differences between consonants and vowels","year":2005}