Jesus’s Confession of Ignorance and Consubstantiality. Nemes, S. TheoLogica, 2024. Publisher: Catholic University of Louvain Type: Article
Paper doi abstract bibtex This essay argues that Jesus’s confession of ignorance about the day and hour of his return (Matt. 24:36; Mark 13:32) is logically inconsistent with the Nicene-Constantinopolitan doctrine of his “consubstantiality” (homoousia) with God the Father. The essay first defines “consubstantiality”, then presents three formulations of the argument, and finally rebuts a number of possible responses: from the textual originality of the phrase “nor the Son”; from the reinterpretation of “knows” as “makes known”; from the ideas of partitive exegesis and communicatio idiomatum; and from the question of the Holy Spirit’s knowledge of the things of God. © 2024, Catholic University of Louvain. All rights reserved.
@article{nemes_jesuss_2024,
title = {Jesus’s {Confession} of {Ignorance} and {Consubstantiality}},
volume = {8},
issn = {25930265},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85183668740&doi=10.14428%2fthl.v8i1.68353&partnerID=40&md5=8c41bebc8047fa3f67bf4d5dd7ce88fe},
doi = {10.14428/thl.v8i1.68353},
abstract = {This essay argues that Jesus’s confession of ignorance about the day and hour of his return (Matt. 24:36; Mark 13:32) is logically inconsistent with the Nicene-Constantinopolitan doctrine of his “consubstantiality” (homoousia) with God the Father. The essay first defines “consubstantiality”, then presents three formulations of the argument, and finally rebuts a number of possible responses: from the textual originality of the phrase “nor the Son”; from the reinterpretation of “knows” as “makes known”; from the ideas of partitive exegesis and communicatio idiomatum; and from the question of the Holy Spirit’s knowledge of the things of God. © 2024, Catholic University of Louvain. All rights reserved.},
language = {English},
number = {1},
journal = {TheoLogica},
author = {Nemes, Steven},
year = {2024},
note = {Publisher: Catholic University of Louvain
Type: Article},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"ez857GC9MsxkqX5FT","bibbaseid":"nemes-jesussconfessionofignoranceandconsubstantiality-2024","author_short":["Nemes, S."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Jesus’s Confession of Ignorance and Consubstantiality","volume":"8","issn":"25930265","url":"https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85183668740&doi=10.14428%2fthl.v8i1.68353&partnerID=40&md5=8c41bebc8047fa3f67bf4d5dd7ce88fe","doi":"10.14428/thl.v8i1.68353","abstract":"This essay argues that Jesus’s confession of ignorance about the day and hour of his return (Matt. 24:36; Mark 13:32) is logically inconsistent with the Nicene-Constantinopolitan doctrine of his “consubstantiality” (homoousia) with God the Father. The essay first defines “consubstantiality”, then presents three formulations of the argument, and finally rebuts a number of possible responses: from the textual originality of the phrase “nor the Son”; from the reinterpretation of “knows” as “makes known”; from the ideas of partitive exegesis and communicatio idiomatum; and from the question of the Holy Spirit’s knowledge of the things of God. © 2024, Catholic University of Louvain. All rights reserved.","language":"English","number":"1","journal":"TheoLogica","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Nemes"],"firstnames":["Steven"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2024","note":"Publisher: Catholic University of Louvain Type: Article","bibtex":"@article{nemes_jesuss_2024,\n\ttitle = {Jesus’s {Confession} of {Ignorance} and {Consubstantiality}},\n\tvolume = {8},\n\tissn = {25930265},\n\turl = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85183668740&doi=10.14428%2fthl.v8i1.68353&partnerID=40&md5=8c41bebc8047fa3f67bf4d5dd7ce88fe},\n\tdoi = {10.14428/thl.v8i1.68353},\n\tabstract = {This essay argues that Jesus’s confession of ignorance about the day and hour of his return (Matt. 24:36; Mark 13:32) is logically inconsistent with the Nicene-Constantinopolitan doctrine of his “consubstantiality” (homoousia) with God the Father. The essay first defines “consubstantiality”, then presents three formulations of the argument, and finally rebuts a number of possible responses: from the textual originality of the phrase “nor the Son”; from the reinterpretation of “knows” as “makes known”; from the ideas of partitive exegesis and communicatio idiomatum; and from the question of the Holy Spirit’s knowledge of the things of God. © 2024, Catholic University of Louvain. All rights reserved.},\n\tlanguage = {English},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {TheoLogica},\n\tauthor = {Nemes, Steven},\n\tyear = {2024},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Catholic University of Louvain\nType: Article},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Nemes, S."],"key":"nemes_jesuss_2024","id":"nemes_jesuss_2024","bibbaseid":"nemes-jesussconfessionofignoranceandconsubstantiality-2024","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85183668740&doi=10.14428%2fthl.v8i1.68353&partnerID=40&md5=8c41bebc8047fa3f67bf4d5dd7ce88fe"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/science_et_ignorance/1340424","dataSources":["zX4acseCDM6D58AW7"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["jesus","confession","ignorance","consubstantiality","nemes"],"title":"Jesus’s Confession of Ignorance and Consubstantiality","year":2024}