@article{nunez_nihil_2021,
	title = {Nihil maius. {Maximitas} dei in unum argumentum of {Anselm}'s {Proslogion} and {Nicholas} of {Cusa}'s {De} docta ignorantia},
	volume = {14},
	issn = {1851-8753},
	shorttitle = {Nihil maius. {La} maximidad de {Dios} en el unum argumentum del {Proslogion} de {Anselmo} y en {De} docta ignorantia de {Nicolás} de {Cusa}},
	doi = {10.48162/rev.35.008},
	abstract = {This article explores a relationship between the notion of maximitas dei in the unum argumentum of the Anselm's Proslogion and by Nicholas of Cusa's De docta ignorantia. Although the explicit anselmian allusions in works of the Cusano do not allow to speak a direct influence, it is tried to show how both authors come together in the speculative yield around the negativity of the maximitas dei. © 2021 Editorial de la Facultad de Filosofia y Letras de la Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. All rights reserved.},
	language = {Spanish},
	number = {2},
	journal = {Scripta Mediaevalia},
	author = {Núñez, R.},
	year = {2021},
	keywords = {Anselm of Canterbury, Nicholas of Cusa, coincidence of opposites, learned ignorance, maximitas dei},
	pages = {107--126},
}

{"_id":"hmZJoD7m5tg5SdZH6","bibbaseid":"nez-nihilmaiusmaximitasdeiinunumargumentumofanselmsproslogionandnicholasofcusasdedoctaignorantia-2021","author_short":["Núñez, R."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Nihil maius. Maximitas dei in unum argumentum of Anselm's Proslogion and Nicholas of Cusa's De docta ignorantia","volume":"14","issn":"1851-8753","shorttitle":"Nihil maius. La maximidad de Dios en el unum argumentum del Proslogion de Anselmo y en De docta ignorantia de Nicolás de Cusa","doi":"10.48162/rev.35.008","abstract":"This article explores a relationship between the notion of maximitas dei in the unum argumentum of the Anselm's Proslogion and by Nicholas of Cusa's De docta ignorantia. Although the explicit anselmian allusions in works of the Cusano do not allow to speak a direct influence, it is tried to show how both authors come together in the speculative yield around the negativity of the maximitas dei. © 2021 Editorial de la Facultad de Filosofia y Letras de la Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. All rights reserved.","language":"Spanish","number":"2","journal":"Scripta Mediaevalia","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Núñez"],"firstnames":["R."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2021","keywords":"Anselm of Canterbury, Nicholas of Cusa, coincidence of opposites, learned ignorance, maximitas dei","pages":"107–126","bibtex":"@article{nunez_nihil_2021,\n\ttitle = {Nihil maius. {Maximitas} dei in unum argumentum of {Anselm}'s {Proslogion} and {Nicholas} of {Cusa}'s {De} docta ignorantia},\n\tvolume = {14},\n\tissn = {1851-8753},\n\tshorttitle = {Nihil maius. {La} maximidad de {Dios} en el unum argumentum del {Proslogion} de {Anselmo} y en {De} docta ignorantia de {Nicolás} de {Cusa}},\n\tdoi = {10.48162/rev.35.008},\n\tabstract = {This article explores a relationship between the notion of maximitas dei in the unum argumentum of the Anselm's Proslogion and by Nicholas of Cusa's De docta ignorantia. Although the explicit anselmian allusions in works of the Cusano do not allow to speak a direct influence, it is tried to show how both authors come together in the speculative yield around the negativity of the maximitas dei. © 2021 Editorial de la Facultad de Filosofia y Letras de la Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. All rights reserved.},\n\tlanguage = {Spanish},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {Scripta Mediaevalia},\n\tauthor = {Núñez, R.},\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tkeywords = {Anselm of Canterbury, Nicholas of Cusa, coincidence of opposites, learned ignorance, maximitas dei},\n\tpages = {107--126},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Núñez, R."],"key":"nunez_nihil_2021","id":"nunez_nihil_2021","bibbaseid":"nez-nihilmaiusmaximitasdeiinunumargumentumofanselmsproslogionandnicholasofcusasdedoctaignorantia-2021","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Anselm of Canterbury","Nicholas of Cusa","coincidence of opposites","learned ignorance","maximitas dei"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/science_et_ignorance/1340424","dataSources":["zX4acseCDM6D58AW7","5XkfmA9xajmKjWGio","ecWkKzf8oGJnBXB4P","bQC9SdDmMQaKMxn76","pSSgmA9As34R3sn9D","jehvwbqHwXWBxFofi","LLWHhkSQN6iBQNqez"],"keywords":["anselm of canterbury","nicholas of cusa","coincidence of opposites","learned ignorance","maximitas dei"],"search_terms":["nihil","maius","maximitas","dei","unum","argumentum","anselm","proslogion","nicholas","cusa","docta","ignorantia","núñez"],"title":"Nihil maius. Maximitas dei in unum argumentum of Anselm's Proslogion and Nicholas of Cusa's De docta ignorantia","year":2021}