Freeing uneven and combined development from the whip of external necessity: toward a synthesis with Dussel’s liberation philosophy. Oksanen, A. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 36(2):164–183, March, 2023. Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2020.1856785
Freeing uneven and combined development from the whip of external necessity: toward a synthesis with Dussel’s liberation philosophy [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
This article argues that while uneven and combined development (U&CD) scholars have made great contributions to theorising the causal implications of societal multiplicity, the overtly normative contributions of U&CD scholarship remain thin. To address this gap, I propose a synthesis between U&CD and Enrique Dussel’s normatively oriented liberation philosophy. To enable this, U&CD must be stripped of its more causally oriented concepts, like the ‘whip of external necessity', which constrains the scope of normative analysis by confining it to sovereign states. Incorporating Dussel’s liberation philosophy and its concept of exteriority into U&CD’s social ontology enables seeing beyond the states-system and allows for the inclusion of stateless peoples as entities and agents of global politics. This is demonstrated by applying the combined conceptual framework to the Chiapas Zapatista movement’s relation to the Mexican state.
@article{oksanen_freeing_2023,
	title = {Freeing uneven and combined development from the whip of external necessity: toward a synthesis with {Dussel}’s liberation philosophy},
	volume = {36},
	issn = {0955-7571},
	shorttitle = {Freeing uneven and combined development from the whip of external necessity},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2020.1856785},
	doi = {10.1080/09557571.2020.1856785},
	abstract = {This article argues that while uneven and combined development (U\&CD) scholars have made great contributions to theorising the causal implications of societal multiplicity, the overtly normative contributions of U\&CD scholarship remain thin. To address this gap, I propose a synthesis between U\&CD and Enrique Dussel’s normatively oriented liberation philosophy. To enable this, U\&CD must be stripped of its more causally oriented concepts, like the ‘whip of external necessity', which constrains the scope of normative analysis by confining it to sovereign states. Incorporating Dussel’s liberation philosophy and its concept of exteriority into U\&CD’s social ontology enables seeing beyond the states-system and allows for the inclusion of stateless peoples as entities and agents of global politics. This is demonstrated by applying the combined conceptual framework to the Chiapas Zapatista movement’s relation to the Mexican state.},
	number = {2},
	urldate = {2025-03-07},
	journal = {Cambridge Review of International Affairs},
	author = {Oksanen, Aslak-Antti},
	month = mar,
	year = {2023},
	note = {Publisher: Routledge
\_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2020.1856785},
	pages = {164--183},
}

Downloads: 0